Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Komodor comparison

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 6 Komodor reviews

1,201 Views
1,201 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Komodor are competing products in the container management space, offering solutions for orchestrating and troubleshooting applications in containers. ECS has the upper hand in scalability and integration, aligning effectively with AWS infrastructure, while data suggests Komodor provides more extensive troubleshooting features for monitoring and maintaining Kubernetes environments.

Features: ECS offers seamless integration with AWS, robust security features, and effective scalability options, ensuring efficient container management. Komodor delivers a comprehensive Kubernetes troubleshooting platform, incorporating alert management and detailed system health insights, which benefits complex environments.

Room for Improvement: ECS may improve by offering more comprehensive Kubernetes support, enhancing detailed monitoring features, and broadening its compatibility beyond AWS environments. Komodor could benefit from enhancing customer support, improving integration with non-Kubernetes environments, and expanding its feature set for greater container orchestration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ECS provides quick deployment and benefits from AWS's extensive customer support and vast knowledge base, improving user assistance. Komodor facilitates streamlined deployment with a specialized support structure focused on Kubernetes complexities.

Pricing and ROI: ECS often presents lower setup costs due to AWS’s scaling infrastructure, offering straightforward ROI through efficient resource utilization. Komodor may incur higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI by reducing downtime with effective troubleshooting.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Komodor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Komodor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.3

Clients reduced costs significantly with AWS ECS, benefiting from efficient resource management and a pay-as-you-go model.

Sentiment score

9.3

Teams using Komodor see up to 90% ROI, with cost savings and developer efficiency through self-service and integration features.

This saving is achieved since, with EC2, the entire virtual machine must be running regardless of workload, whereas Fargate eliminates this cost.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

We saw around ninety percent ROI using Komodor.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Amazon Elastic Container Service support is responsive and helpful, but costly with occasional expertise gaps and limited documentation.

Sentiment score

9.0

Komodor offers responsive support and helpful features, but time zone differences may delay responses for West Coast teams.

AWS partnership provides access to their architects for guidance when needed.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We do not rely heavily on technical support from AWS as we have our own teams managing the infrastructure.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

I would rate the customer support from Komodor a ten out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Amazon ECS boasts strong scalability, praised for workload management, resource flexibility, yet noted for potential reactivity issues.

Sentiment score

9.3

Komodor generally handles scalability well across clusters, though some report performance issues with numerous nodes and clusters.

Amazon Elastic Container Service has significant limitations regarding scalability.

Alexander Gomez

Lead Developer at Virtual Restaurant Solutions

Amazon Elastic Container Service has a scalability rating of ten out of ten.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Scalability becomes an inherent capability in the cloud context, and this service does well in that regard.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Komodor is very highly scalable in terms of infrastructure and in terms of the number of nodes we use.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Amazon ECS is highly stable with minimal issues, though configuration adjustments may require technical expertise for optimal performance.

Sentiment score

8.8

Komodor is generally stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, updates improving reliability, though occasional performance delays occur.

The stability of Amazon Elastic Container Service is excellent.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Amazon Elastic Container Service is mostly very stable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Room For Improvement

Amazon Elastic Container Service struggles with reliability, user-friendliness, integration, and cost, requiring improved security and management simplification.

Komodor needs installation upgrades, better visibility, intuitive alerts, cost analytics, system alignment, and feature integration for improved usability.

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

When it comes to new-age services around AI, particularly in the areas of LLMs and genomics, these services are not fully available in our region's availability domain.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

A lower price for Amazon Elastic Container Service would be better, but it is comparable to other offerings in the market, so it is on par in that sense.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

There are some features related to the platform that are missing in Komodor, such as Tigera status or CNI pods.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Setup Cost

Amazon ECS features pay-as-you-go pricing, praised for scalability but sometimes costly compared to competitors, with no license fees.

Komodor's pricing is seen as fair and flexible, benefiting startups but raising cost concerns as scale increases.

Amazon Elastic Container Service is quite cheap compared to Google, particularly for hosting databases.

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Our customers often do a trade-off between requiring services at particular SLA levels and being willing to pay a premium price to us as partners.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Compared with Rancher or any other tools, Komodor is priced cheaply and available at a fair price.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Valuable Features

Amazon ECS offers auto-scaling, cost-effectiveness, easy AWS integration, excellent security, and efficient resource management with Fargate support.

Komodor enhances productivity by providing real-time insights, efficient debugging, and AI-assisted diagnostics, supporting quick problem identification in Kubernetes environments.

Main benefits that Amazon Elastic Container Service provides include saving maintenance costs in terms of saving time, and since it auto scales, we save on infrastructure costs by running at lower instances when it is not heavily used.

ShitanshuChandra

Head of Products at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It inherently offers scalability by default, without our IT teams needing to take the extra load to make the services available for our end users.

General Manager at Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service.

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon Elastic Container Service report

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

For instance, when application teams want to deploy their applications, if Rancher is not up or running, the deployments usually fail at the deployment stage. In the case of Komodor, there have been no such cases reported after adopting it.

For more quotes and insights, download the Komodor report

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Containers as a Service (CaaS) (1st)

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Komodor is 3.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon Elastic Container Service	1.4%
Komodor	3.6%
Other	95.0%

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Alexander Gomez

Lead Developer at Virtual Restaurant Solutions

Starts strong with functionalities but reveals cost limitations

The main challenge with Amazon Elastic Container Service is the significant learning curve. Everything mentioned took months to understand. It is not for the faint of heart. Though they have graphical interfaces and numerous dashboards that help create all the services graphically, learning to use Bash can be challenging. Because these are headless servers by nature, there is no graphical interface. It is not similar to Windows where you can hit the start button and look for your program, or Mac where you can look for programs on your desktop. Instead, users must understand this new paradigm of a Linux headless server, which requires using command-based prompts for builds and development.

Read full review

Unified cloud workloads have become visible and teams manage kubernetes issues efficiently

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

This is the main task that we use Komodor for, and one additional benefit is that it is also helpful for platform and site reliability engineers to check how many clusters are up and running and how many clusters are accepting the workloads from the users. One of the best features that Komodor offers is Cloud AI, which debugs all the logs and gives the exact root cause for the issue. From there, we know we do not need an engineer who is an expert in Kubernetes to debug the issue. Cloud AI has definitely helped my team by saving time, not in a single instance but in multiple cases where we have used Cloud AI for debugging issues in the Kubernetes pods. Komodor has positively impacted our organization. Since adopting it, all the issues we faced while managing Rancher are gone, and we are seeing 100% availability for Komodor. 100% availability with Komodor means there have been improvements in uptime and productivity. For instance, when application teams want to deploy their applications, if Rancher is not up or running, the deployments usually fail at the deployment stage. In the case of Komodor, there have been no such cases reported after adopting it. We saw 100% uptime most of the time, except for some issues with AWS outages.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 34% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 9% of the time

Google Container Engine vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 69% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 11% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Komodor

Compared 3% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

Product Reports

Amazon Elastic Container Service

January 2026

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Download Komodor product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Information Not Available