"The solution is simple to access."
"It's quick and easy to have the solution working."
"Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."
"It has helped our organization greatly and especially on weekends because we have many transactions as our users are buying some kind of tools and paying online."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to create revisions on the configurations."
"The product's most valuable feature is service discovery functionality. It is an excellent feature impacting cost reduction."
"The solution is quite scalable and allows you to launch multiple EC2s within minutes."
"The product's initial setup was very straightforward and not complex."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."
"We noticed a problem where our container doesn't always run, and the traffic in our secured license exceeds 100%, leading to increased container costs. We are working to understand and reduce this traffic to control costs."
"Sometimes, the instances fail under the ECS container cluster, and we have to manually go and find out the black sheep in the ECS container instance. We had an issue earlier where one of the instances under the ECS container cluster went down, and we were not able to identify that instance. The instance got terminated, but a new instance did not come up. Therefore, I had to manually get that instance up. It could be optimized better. In production, we normally cannot sustain such things. It can be optimized in terms of instances, durability, and serving the requests of customers."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"Probably, they should include automated graphing, and monitoring solutions."
"After the load balancer gets attached to Amazon Elastic Container Service clusters, I can't modify, remove, or replace it later."
"The solution needs to be more usable."
"I think that it would help if the vendor provided more use cases and explanations as to how ECS can be utilized."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Azure Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 1st in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 46 reviews while Microsoft Azure Container Service is ranked 2nd in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 7 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Azure Container Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Container Service writes "Reliable, expandable and great for Microsoft-heavy environments". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas Microsoft Azure Container Service is most compared with .
See our list of best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Containers as a Service (CaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
