Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Microsoft Azure Container Service comparison

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (7th)

Microsoft Azure Container S...

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Containers as a Service (CaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 33.1%, down from 37.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Container Service is 26.3%, down from 35.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Containers as a Service (CaaS)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.

Read full review

PrateekMehrotra

Solutions Architect/Team Lead at Publicis Sapient

Secure, good integration capability, and you don't have to maintain any infrastructure

I have been in touch with the Microsoft technical support team many times. Generally it is good, although it depends on the type of support that you have. They have multiple support plans available, and my interaction with them depends on the support that they subscribe to. Some of my clients have premium support plans, in which an engineer will be assigned to you. They track each and every issue and it will be a pretty quick turnaround time for the issues that you face. If you are on a standard support plan then it has its own affiliates that will be followed up by Microsoft. Even in this case, the response time is quite good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Container Service is its flexibility."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is a flexible product from Amazon. You can put it in the Auto Scaling group for high availability. There are also a lot of choices for pricing."

"The solution has good performance."

"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The cloud services are readily available."

"The containerization is a valuable feature for us."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros

"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."

"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."

"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."

"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."

"Visualization is the most important feature."

"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."

"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."

Cons

"The solution's pricing could be improved."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service should include more enterprise project management features, typically available in an OpenShift environment."

"The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac."

"The solution’s UI should be improved."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service needs to improve the menu design. It needs to improve deployment with better documentation."

"I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It easily dies."

"We noticed a problem where our container doesn't always run, and the traffic in our secured license exceeds 100%, leading to increased container costs. We are working to understand and reduce this traffic to control costs."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service should simplify its management. It can be difficult for someone who doesn't have much experience with the tool. Also, the tool needs to add the ability to manage networks."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons

"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."

"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."

"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."

"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."

"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."

"The customization is an area that needs improvement."

"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's cost could be reduced."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is priced high."

"The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average."

"They offer a pay-as-you-go pricing model for the product."

"Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."

"We have to pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon EC2 Container Service."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service has a decent price, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice

"The costs depend on the resources that you use, and there is a cost-management system to help calculate it."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"Microsoft Azure Container Service has costs but in the container environment, there are no costs because it is open source and we are using Docker as the container engine in the master and worker nodes established in the Azure environment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Container Service?

The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Container Service?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Container Service?

Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Comparisons

Compared 72% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 15% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Amazon Elastic Container Service

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Microsoft Azure Container Service

Download Microsoft Azure Container Service product report

Microsoft Azure Container Service report

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

MS Azure Container Service

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Esri, BIO CATCH

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service