We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and NGINX App Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."The solution is easy-to-set up."
"EKS provides autoscaling functionality."
"Break down your application into small modules to improve resiliency"
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"The solution's Autoscaler option allows for an increase in worker notes whenever particular thresholds are exceeded."
"It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Amazon EKS is very scalable."
"The policies are flexible based on the technologies you use."
"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its open source."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"NGINX App Protect is stable."
"It has the best documentation features."
"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility."
"The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found."
"The stability of the product is very impressive since it handles 60,000 to 70,000 requests or transactions per second."
"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"Amazon EKS is not a solution that can be fully managed through automation, making it an area of concern where improvement is required."
"They could add logging features. At present, we use external tools to increase and decrease the number of instances."
"The dashboard needs to be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward."
"The price of NGINX App Protect could improve."
"Areas for improvement would be if NGINX could scan for vulnerabilities and learn and update the signatures of DoS attacks."
"Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI."
"The setup of NGINX App Protect is complex. The full process took one week to complete. Additionally, we had to change the network infrastructure platform which took one month."
"As far as scalability, it takes a long time for deployment."
"They could provide a better user interface."
"The integration of NGINX App Protect could improve."
"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections."
Amazon EKS is ranked 15th in Container Security with 38 reviews while NGINX App Protect is ranked 20th in Container Security with 19 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
