

NGINX App Protect and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are contenders in the application security and traffic management sector. While Azure Application Gateway has an edge due to its seamless integration with other Azure services and ease of use, NGINX App Protect is appreciated for its robust security features.
Features: NGINX App Protect provides security headers, proxy capabilities, and a command-line interface. Its reverse proxy capabilities, auto-learning, and bot protection are highly valued. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is noted for comprehensive traffic management, ease of use, and effective web application firewall (WAF). Its seamless integration with Azure services, scalability, and straightforward configuration are significant advantages.
Room for Improvement: NGINX App Protect needs enhancements in flexibility, pricing structures, and integration with current security solutions. It also faces scalability challenges and lacks certain automation features. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway requires better flexibility, scalability, and security features. Simplifying the configuration process and enhancing performance and third-party feature integration would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX App Protect often demands on-premises deployment, limiting its versatility compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's support for public and hybrid clouds. Feedback on NGINX support varies, whereas Microsoft Azure benefits from a robust support network but is sometimes criticized for slow responses and complex initial configurations.
Pricing and ROI: NGINX App Protect is viewed as pricey with a complex pricing model based on instances but offers decent ROI with significant initial investment. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, while also expensive, provides a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model without steep licensing fees. Users report favorable ROI, particularly those heavily integrated with Azure, though initial costs are noted as high.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
They were quick and efficient when we had issues.
I would rate the customer support a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
The scalability of NGINX App Protect is good and open source at its best.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
It is a quality solution, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would like to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations.
There was more information from F5 regarding hardware requirements and specifications to deploy the service.
For now, I think NGINX App Protect is good, but maybe I would like to see the logging feature added.
The GUI and web GUI configuration could be improved to be easier to manage and use.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
The gateway's Web Application Firewall feature enhances security as it is the first entry point to your network from the outside world.
The most valuable feature is the ability to operate in a DevOps environment and to be configured through API and pipeline by the developers themselves.
Some threats like injection and running scripts, SQL injections, these all get stopped and rejected by the server.
Detecting bots and blocking IPs have proven effective for securing applications.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 2.8% |
| NGINX App Protect | 2.0% |
| Other | 95.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers advanced traffic management and security features for web applications. It includes built-in rules, Layer 7 control, autoscaling, and integration options, providing flexibility and security for managing application traffic efficiently.
Azure Application Gateway is utilized by organizations for securing and managing web traffic with its comprehensive web application firewall, load balancing capabilities, and Layer 7 firewall rules. Known for its ease of setup and integration, the platform facilitates external application access and deploys secure services. While it enhances security with customized configurations, users note areas for improvement such as configuration complexity, pricing, third-party tool integration, and automation. Addressing these aspects can improve user experience and performance.
What are the key features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Application Gateway to protect sensitive data and manage significant web traffic. Its application deployment support and security capabilities make it suitable for businesses needing to ensure secure data exchange and reliable access to online services.
NGINX App Protect offers comprehensive security features like auto-learning and bot protection. Its real-time threat detection and ease of integration make it suitable for web and mobile application security across on-premises, cloud, and container environments.
NGINX App Protect stands out with its adaptive machine learning, scalable deployment options, and robust API connectivity, offering Layer 7 DDoS protection and an OWASP-certified WAF. While it supports comprehensive traffic and security management, enhancements in platform integration, automation, and technical support could improve usability. The pricing model and policy management options could also see refinement. Commonly employed in securing web and mobile applications, it addresses threats including OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and DDoS attacks, while providing seamless integration with Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines.
What are the key features of NGINX App Protect?NGINX App Protect finds broader use in sectors like banking and telecommunications, where it secures high-performance digital infrastructures. Its application spans perimeter security, load balancing, and acts as a reverse proxy in environments necessitating stringent security, high throughput, and robust management. The tool's adaptability facilitates its deployment alongside containers, ensuring compatibility with contemporary development practices.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.