Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Amazon EKS Logo

Top 10 Amazon EKS Alternatives

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.3 out of 5
Badge Leader
385 followers
Start review

Top Amazon EKS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Amazon EKS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Cloud, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Amazon EKS surpasses its competitors by delivering robust integration with AWS infrastructure, seamless Kubernetes management, and exceptional scalability, enhancing cloud-native applications' performance and simplifying deployment, thereby empowering developers with unparalleled efficiency and control in their cloud strategies.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Amazon EKS offers scalable features ideal for cloud-native applications, though limited in flexibility for machine learning. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides comprehensive security coverage, potentially complex for non-technical users, but beneficial for enterprises with extensive security requirements.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Amazon EKS offers a flexible cost structure that may be more beneficial for startups, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a comprehensive security setup with potentially higher initial costs, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing security.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS offers a flexible cost structure that may be more beneficial for startups, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a comprehensive security setup with potentially higher initial costs, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing security.
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Amazon EKS offers seamless scalability and serverless compute integration, appealing to cloud-focused businesses. In comparison, VMware Tanzu excels in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, integrating well with existing VMware products, beneficial for organizations seeking versatile cloud strategies.
Download Amazon EKS vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Amazon EKS has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, which involves a more complex and costly installation process. This distinct difference highlights Amazon EKS as a more budget-friendly option for quicker deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Tanzu Platform, which involves a more complex and costly installation process. This distinct difference highlights Amazon EKS as a more budget-friendly option for quicker deployment.
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
4.2 out of 5

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Download Amazon EKS vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report
The license to use the OpenShift Container Platform is free. If you are capable with Java you can modify it.
The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins.
View comparison
Pricing
The license to use the OpenShift Container Platform is free. If you are capable with Java you can modify it.
The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins.
Amazon EKS Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Amazon EKS Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides versatile deployment and cost-effective solutions, emphasizing user-friendly integration with Kubernetes. In comparison, Amazon EKS offers strong multi-cloud operations and advanced AWS service integration, appealing for its robust orchestration and security features.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective setup, whereas Amazon EKS involves a more complex and higher initial expense, highlighting a key difference in setup costs between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective setup, whereas Amazon EKS involves a more complex and higher initial expense, highlighting a key difference in setup costs between the two platforms.
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
3.8 out of 5
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine offers seamless integration with Nutanix's cloud, ideal for users valuing security and customer support. In comparison, Amazon EKS provides global scalability and AWS integration, suited for those seeking extensive features and scalability despite its more complex deployment process.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Amazon EKS setup involves more cost variables. NKE may offer clearer initial pricing, whereas EKS might require deeper analysis to understand overall expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Amazon EKS setup involves more cost variables. NKE may offer clearer initial pricing, whereas EKS might require deeper analysis to understand overall expenses.
Amazon EKS Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Amazon EKS Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Kubernetes offers extensive open-source community support and flexibility across clouds. In comparison, Amazon EKS provides seamless AWS integration and reduced management overhead. Tech buyers may prefer Kubernetes for its adaptability, while others might choose Amazon EKS for its ease within AWS environments.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Kubernetes Report
Kubernetes offers flexibility with no setup cost, while Amazon EKS requires an additional fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Kubernetes over EKS.
View comparison
Pricing
Kubernetes offers flexibility with no setup cost, while Amazon EKS requires an additional fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Kubernetes over EKS.
Amazon EKS Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
Amazon EKS Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
Amazon EKS offers ease of deployment through Fargate and seamless Kubernetes integration for cloud-native applications. In comparison, Docker excels in containerization, environment consistency, and offers cost-effective solutions suitable for smaller projects. Both provide extensive support options and documentation.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Docker Report
Amazon EKS has a setup cost praised for simplicity, whereas Docker's setup cost requires more manual configuration, highlighting its complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS has a setup cost praised for simplicity, whereas Docker's setup cost requires more manual configuration, highlighting its complexity.
Amazon EKS Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Amazon EKS Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Amazon EKS provides scalability and integration within AWS, appealing for cloud-centric deployment. In comparison, Komodor emphasizes advanced diagnostics and troubleshooting for Kubernetes, ideal for quickly resolving issues. Tech buyers may choose EKS for AWS benefits or Komodor for specialized operational management.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Komodor Report
Amazon EKS provides a high setup cost, while Komodor offers a cost-effective alternative, highlighting a critical difference in affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS provides a high setup cost, while Komodor offers a cost-effective alternative, highlighting a critical difference in affordability between the two solutions.
Amazon EKS Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
Amazon EKS Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
HashiCorp Nomad's simplicity and lower setup costs attract those seeking flexible, cost-effective management. In comparison, Amazon EKS appeals to tech buyers needing robust AWS integration and scalability. Nomad offers versatility with less overhead, while EKS provides comprehensive ecosystem support and strategic investment benefits.
Download Amazon EKS vs. HashiCorp Nomad Report
HashiCorp Nomad offers a flexible setup cost, while Amazon EKS is characterized by higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
HashiCorp Nomad offers a flexible setup cost, while Amazon EKS is characterized by higher initial expenses.
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
3.5 out of 5

Accelerate your journey to hybrid cloud with the industry’s first enterprise-grade container software platform for cloud-native and distributed non-cloud native applications.

Download Amazon EKS vs. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform Report
View comparison
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)
4.0 out of 5
Amazon EKS offers seamless AWS integration with lower setup costs, appealing to businesses within the AWS ecosystem. In comparison, Nutanix Kubernetes Platform attracts users with its comprehensive feature set and superior hybrid cloud management, justifying higher initial investments for multi-cloud needs.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) Report
Amazon EKS offers a straightforward setup with predictable cost structures, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) involves potentially higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set. EKS provides a simpler cost model compared to NKP's robust offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS offers a straightforward setup with predictable cost structures, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) involves potentially higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set. EKS provides a simpler cost model compared to NKP's robust offerings.
Amazon EKS Logo
Amazon EKS Logo
NGINX Ingress Controller
1 out of 5
NGINX Ingress Controller is a powerful tool that enables organizations to manage and route traffic to their Kubernetes clusters. It acts as a load balancer and reverses proxy for incoming traffic, allowing for efficient and secure communication between clients and backend services. 
The most useful functionality of the solution is its ability to provide advanced traffic management features such as SSL termination, URL rewriting, and session persistence. By using NGINX Ingress Controller, organizations can improve the performance and reliability of their applications, reduce downtime, and enhance security.
View comparison

Related categories

Container Management
Container Security
Vulnerability Management