• Home
  • Adobe Experience Manager vs. Interact Intranet

Adobe Experience Manager vs Interact Intranet comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo

Adobe Experience Manager

Read 16 Adobe Experience Manager reviews
1,292 views|837 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Interact Intranet Logo

Interact Intranet

Read 1 Interact Intranet review
52 views|47 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager and Interact Intranet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Gaurav Mishra
Feature-rich, with a straightforward GUI, and an analytics dashboard that shows you the traffic source, number of...
The main benefit of using Adobe Experience Manager in the company is that it lets you easily manage your websites and content. You can also have a... Read more →
Anonymous User
Blogging, forums and rewards create communication links between our worldwide offices.
This product has helped our organisation function more efficiently. We now have one central place where anyone can go to find all the resources... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."
  • "It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."
  • "Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

    • More Adobe Experience Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing and stability could be improved.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?
    Top Answer:Adobe Experience Manager is used for user experience, product design, and user journeys.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    1,292
    Comparisons
    837
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.2
    5th
    out of 15 in Enterprise Intranet
    Views
    52
    Comparisons
    47
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud
    Learn More
    Adobe
    Interact Intranet
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers. 

    A secure intranet, quickly and easily updated by non technical users, giving companies a single source portal for information.
    Sample Customers
    Metra
    ASPCA, Staffordshire Housing Association, G4S, Mediterranean Shipping Company, DWF LLP, Wheatley Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization41%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe Experience Manager is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews while Interact Intranet is ranked 5th in Enterprise Intranet. Adobe Experience Manager is rated 7.8, while Interact Intranet is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager writes "A powerful product that can be used for user experience, product design, and user journeys". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Interact Intranet writes "Blogging, forums and rewards create communication links between our worldwide offices". Adobe Experience Manager is most compared with Adobe CQ5, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, WordPress and SharePoint, whereas Interact Intranet is most compared with Yammer and Slack.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.