Adobe Experience Manager vs Drupal comparison

"The search capability in Adobe Experience Manager is superior, as search capabilities are determined by the metadata, and it also has metadata automation using AI."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"The best feature is the experience fragment; if you want to replicate content across multiple websites with 1,000 or 20,000 pages, this feature helps accomplish it in a fraction of seconds."

"Adobe Experience Manager is one of the best enterprise-level content management and digital experience platforms available."

"I like the profiling and segmentation."

"Adobe Experience Manager has made document management smoother because many people use Adobe, making it simpler for me to modify and resend PDF documents."

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."

"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."

"It is good for big projects."

"You can build websites on it very quickly."

"The licensing plus implementation and maintenance cost is very expensive, making it not suitable for small organizations, and the setup is very complex."

"Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

"Adobe Experience Manager needs more optimization. The frequency of components where we have vitals of a page or an app needs to be optimized because these are heavy Java codes along with some AEM developments."

"There is a feature missing where if content is created on the UAT environment and needs to be transferred or synced to the production environment, there is no direct way of doing the sync."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"The licenses are very expensive."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"It is a little bit simplified."

"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."

"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."

"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's really costly."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"I would like to see better pricing."