Adobe Experience Manager vs Drupal comparison

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer."

"I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

"If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"It is good for big projects."

"You can build websites on it very quickly."

"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."

"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service."

"The licenses are very expensive."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved."

"Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"It is a little bit simplified."

"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."

"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."

"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"It's really costly."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"I would like to see better pricing."