Adobe Experience Manager vs Drupal comparison

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"Adobe Experience Manager is pretty stable."

"I like the profiling and segmentation."

"I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution."

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."

"It is good for big projects."

"You can build websites on it very quickly."

"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

"The licenses are very expensive."

"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."

"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."

"It is a little bit simplified."

"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"It's really costly."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"I would like to see better pricing."