Adobe Experience Manager vs Drupal comparison

"If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR."

"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website."

"Easy to work with the solution."

"It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer."

"The search capability in Adobe Experience Manager is superior, as search capabilities are determined by the metadata, and it also has metadata automation using AI."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"You can build websites on it very quickly."

"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."

"It is good for big projects."

"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement."

"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved."

"The licenses are very expensive."

"Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service."

"Many people complain about the price as it's one of the most expensive tools."

"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."

"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."

"It is a little bit simplified."

"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"It's really costly."

"I would like to see better pricing."