Acunetix vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

Invicti and MathWorks are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while MathWorks is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. Invicti holds a 2.8% mindshare in AS, compared to MathWorks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of MathWorks users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

6,151 Views
2,952 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 6 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

2,295 Views
1,538 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Polyspace Code Prover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Polyspace Code Prover are both advanced tools in the software security and code quality sector. Polyspace Code Prover generally holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite a higher cost.

Features: Acunetix offers extensive web application testing, automated scanning features, and effective vulnerability detection. Polyspace Code Prover provides robust static code analysis, focuses on detecting runtime errors, and ensures code correctness.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve integration with other tools, enhance performance for large applications, and provide advanced integration options. Polyspace Code Prover needs better user guidance, improved reporting capabilities, and more intuitive interfaces and documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix deployment is straightforward with reliable support. Polyspace Code Prover deployment is more complex and receives mixed feedback on technical support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is recognized for its affordability and cost-effective pricing, delivering satisfactory ROI. Polyspace Code Prover, while more expensive, offers substantial ROI through in-depth code verification, which justifies its higher price.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th), Vulnerability Management (21st), DevSecOps (6th)

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.8%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Pradeep Panchakarla

Functional Safety Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A reliable solution that provides excellent features and detects memory corruption

The run time analysis process must be improved. If we do not run with the main loop, it generates its own main and doesn’t allow developers to modify the execution sequences. The solution must provide more flexibility to the developers to manipulate the runtime analysis tools. The developer must be allowed to modify the main sequence. It will be very easy for them to test their use cases. Otherwise, Polyspace generates a random main file and executes all the functions randomly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

"Picks up weaknesses in our app setups."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More Acunetix pros

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"The outputs are very reliable."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

Cons

"There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

More Acunetix cons

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The solution is expensive."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"We use the paid version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

37%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation. It require support. There could be an issue with range propag...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Coverity vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 29% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 21% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 17% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 7% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 5% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

August 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

August 2025

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover

July 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Polyspace Code Prover report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.