Polyspace Code Prover vs SonarQube comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MathWorks Logo
1,776 views|1,181 comparisons
Sonar Logo
57,256 views|45,052 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Polyspace Code Prover and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The outputs are very reliable.""When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences.""The product detects memory corruptions.""Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect.""Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

More Polyspace Code Prover Pros →

"Engineers have also learned from the results and have improved themselves as engineers. This will help them with their careers.""The SonarQube dashboard looks great.""SonarQube is good for checking and maintaining code quality.""The code coverage feature is very good.""Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions.""This solution is simple to use and can be quickly deployed.""The overall quality of the indicator is good.""The most valuable feature is the security hotspot feature that identifies where your code is prone to have security issues."

More SonarQube Pros →

Cons
"The tool has some stability issues.""Automation could be a challenge.""Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes.""One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run.""I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

More Polyspace Code Prover Cons →

"I think the code security can be improved.""It does not provide deeper scanning of vulnerabilities in an application, on a live session. This is something we are not happy about. Maybe the reason for that is we are running the community edition currently, but other editions may improve on that aspect.""One thing to improve would be the integration. There is a steep learning curve to get it integrated.""A better design of the interface and add some new rules.""A robust credential scanner would be a huge bonus as it would remove the need for yet another niche product.""Technical support and the price could be better.""If you don't have any experience with the configuration or how to configure the files, it can be complicated.""We had some issues where the Quality Gate check sometimes gets stuck and it is unclear."

More SonarQube Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is open source."
  • "We did not purchase a license (required for C++ support), but this option was considered."
  • "Get the paid version which allows the customized dashboard and provides technical support."
  • "People can try the free licenses and later can seek buying plugins/support, etc. once they started liking it."
  • "This product is open source and very convenient."
  • "The licence is standard open source licensing"
  • "The price point on SonarQube is good."
  • "Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now."
  • More SonarQube Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts… more »
    Top Answer:There are two main areas of improvement. * False negatives and false positives. * The speed of the validation itself. Another area I see for improvement is scalability, particularly when dealing with… more »
    Top Answer:I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have  a look… more »
    Top Answer:SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use… more »
    Top Answer:We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,776
    Comparisons
    1,181
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    656
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    57,256
    Comparisons
    45,052
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    397
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Checkmarx logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    SonarCloud logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Sonar
    Learn More
    MathWorks
    Video Not Available
    Interactive Demo
    MathWorks
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

    SonarQube is a self-managed open-source platform that helps developers create code devoid of quality and vulnerability issues. By integrating seamlessly with the top DevOps platforms in the Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline, SonarQube continuously inspects projects across multiple programming languages, providing immediate status feedback while coding. SonarQube’s quality gates become part of your release pipeline, displaying pass/fail results for new code based on quality profiles you customize to your company standards. Following Sonar’s Clean as You Code methodology guarantees that only software of the highest quality makes it to production.

    At its core, SonarQube includes a static code analyzer that identifies bugs, security vulnerabilities, hidden secrets, and code smells. The platform guides you through issue resolution, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. SonarQube’s comprehensive reporting is a valuable tool for dev teams to monitor their codebase's overall health and quality across multiple projects in their portfolio. With SonarQube, you can achieve a state of Clean Code, leading to secure, reliable, and maintainable software.

    Sonar is the only solution combining the power of industry-leading software quality analysis with static application security testing (SAST) and real-time coding guidance in the IDE (with SonarLint) to meet the DevOps and DevSecOps demand of putting agility, automation, and security in the hands of developers. Further accelerate DevOps continuous integration by helping developers find and fix issues in code before the software testing stage, reducing the churn of finding, fixing, rebuilding, and retesting your app.

    With over 5,000 Clean Code rules, SonarQube analyzes 30+ of the most popular programming languages, including dozens of frameworks, the top DevOps platforms (GitLab, GitHub, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket, and more), and the leading infrastructure as code (IaC) platforms.

    SonarQube is the most trusted static code analyzer used by over 7 million developers and 400,000 organizations globally to clean over half a trillion lines of code.

    Sample Customers
    Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company34%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Transportation Company7%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Polyspace Code Prover is ranked 23rd in Application Security Tools with 5 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 108 reviews. Polyspace Code Prover is rated 7.6, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Polyspace Code Prover writes "A stable solution for developing software components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Polyspace Code Prover is most compared with Coverity, Klocwork, CodeSonar, Parasoft SOAtest and Veracode, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk. See our Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.