

OpenText Core Application Security and Polyspace Code Prover both compete in the application security domain, focusing on different aspects. Based on features, OpenText has an advantage with its comprehensive application security view, while Polyspace shines in specialized safety-critical and runtime issues.
Features: OpenText Core Application Security includes static and dynamic scanning, real-time updates, and central testing management. It aids in rapid compliance, risk reduction, and integration flexibility. Polyspace Code Prover is designed for functional safety, detecting overflow or division errors through code execution and smoothly integrating into automotive and embedded software environments, critical for safety assurance.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Application Security could improve in reporting visuals, reducing false positives, and expanding language support. Challenges also exist in integrating with incident management. Polyspace Code Prover needs enhancements in automation, speed, and scalability, particularly for large systems, and could improve flexibility in runtime analysis and false positive reduction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Application Security provides flexible deployment options, including both on-premises and cloud solutions. Polyspace mainly focuses on on-premises deployment with limited cloud options, which might restrict flexibility. OpenText's customer service experiences vary, while Polyspace generally offers timely problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Application Security is priced on the higher end but offers great security returns and flexible pricing to suit diverse setups. Polyspace Code Prover's cost is justified by its specialized safety-critical capabilities, providing significant value in high-assurance-level industries.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Application Security | 3.4% |
| Polyspace Code Prover | 1.3% |
| Other | 95.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.