Acunetix vs Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Invicti Logo
1,642 views|1,231 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Fortinet Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acunetix and Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have.""It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.""Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden.""The usability and overall scan results are good.""Picks up weaknesses in our app setups.""Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick.""There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

More Acunetix Pros →

"The biggest thing, for us lately, has been their cloud tools. They're like Intercept X from Sophos, where they'll test for ransomware. Fortinet has the same sort of set up with their cloud devices. So your firewall picks up something suspicious, it sends it up to the cloud for analysis. We also have their in-house antivirus. Having different antivirus checkpoints throughout the network is a good thing as well.""The most valuable features of this solution are the security aspects.""It is extremely stable, and can expand as per our needs due to its stability.""We use it to protect files and to prevent users from browsing them while they are being used.""The solution is very good at preventing intrusions. You can definitely rely on this solution to cover your security.""The dashboard is very simple. It has an easy to use interface."

More Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing.""There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better.""It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.""There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others.""The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans.""Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA.""Acunetix needs to include agent analysis.""When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

More Acunetix Cons →

"The pricing of this solution is a little bit on the high side and can be improved.""I'm an old-school guy. I really don't like web GUI interfaces. They're always slow and laggy and their design is restricted, whereas a binary deployment for an admin tool is always faster, easier, more flexible. I would like that kind of functionality from Fortinet.""We had some issues trying to fix some critical bugs, such as the SSL encryption.""Some use case analyses could be improved.""They need to improve the web filter to make it more user-friendly.""I would like better APIs and integration with other products, like Python and SQL."

More Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
  • "Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
  • "The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."
  • "The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
  • "I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
  • "The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
  • "When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
  • More Acunetix Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's relatively inexpensive in comparison to everything else that has the same functionality. If you're looking at SonicWall or if you're looking at WatchGuard, their prices are about a third higher with relatively the same functionality."
  • "It is not expensive."
  • "In the licensing model, the licenses are a little bit expensive."
  • "The cost needs to be reduced."
  • "It is not costly."
  • More Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
    Top Answer:There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others.
    Top Answer:We use the product for dynamic analysis. It also helps us to scan web applications.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    Views
    1,642
    Comparisons
    1,231
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    291
    Rating
    8.5
    Unranked
    In Vulnerability Management
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AcuSensor
    FortiDB, FortiGuard Database Security
    Learn More
    Overview

    Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

    FortiDB software is a comprehensive database security and compliance platform that helps large enterprises and cloud-based service providers protect their databases and applications from internal and external threats. Its flexible policy framework allows you to quickly and easily implement internal IT control frameworks for database activity monitoring, IT audit and regulatory compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
    Chunghwa Telecom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acunetix is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 26 reviews while Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Vulnerability Management. Acunetix is rated 7.6, while Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] writes "The cloud tools are able to test for ransomware when the firewall picks up something suspicous". Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Fortinet FortiDB [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.