ActiveBatch by Redwood vs AuraQuantic comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and AuraQuantic are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.5, while AuraQuantic is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to AuraQuantic’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AuraQuantic users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

664 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

347 Views
238 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

AuraQuantic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

AuraQuantic and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competing products in the process automation and workload automation markets, respectively. AuraQuantic seems to have the upper hand in terms of ease of use and deployment speed, while ActiveBatch is more robust in its automation capabilities.

Features: AuraQuantic offers user-friendly low-code application development, process modeling flexibility, and comprehensive deployment options. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides powerful scheduling features, extensive integration capabilities, and a centralized automation hub that supports complex workflows.

Room for Improvement: AuraQuantic could enhance its initial setup documentation, offer more advanced workflow customization options, and improve its mobile interface design. ActiveBatch might improve its user interface for non-technical users, simplify its onboarding process, and streamline its integration with some outdated systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AuraQuantic's cloud-based platform offers quicker deployment and strong customer support that facilitates seamless integration with existing systems. ActiveBatch requires a more complex initial setup but provides detailed technical support designed for complex IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: AuraQuantic provides competitive pricing with attractive ROI due to its reduced setup time and operational efficiency. ActiveBatch, despite higher initial setup costs, justifies its price with superior long-term automation efficiencies and detailed workflow management features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Workload Automation (4th)

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Process Automation

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (17th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc."

"It can connect to a number of third-party/legacy systems."

"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"The Jobs Library has been a tremendous asset. For the most, that's what we use. There are some outliers, but we pretty much integrate those Jobs Library steps throughout the process, whether it's REST calls, FTP processes, or file copies and moves... That has helped us to build end-to-end workflows."

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"The user interface is really incredible."

"There are hundreds of pre-built steps."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

"It's a low-code application."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."

Cons

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"The documentation is very limited, and it can be improved."

"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."

"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."

"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 21% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Appian vs AuraQuantic

Compared 45% of the time

Camunda vs AuraQuantic

Compared 30% of the time

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 24% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

May 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

May 2025

Download AuraQuantic product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

Interface

Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

Logic

This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

Data

To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

Application Governance

Access rights management (to apps and app development), Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developers, Role-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.

Business Analytics

Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

Connectivity

API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
Connector builder
REST and SOAP web services connector
External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
.Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
More built-in connectors (50+)
Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

AuraQuantic

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

April 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.