Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo

Top 10 Check Point SandBlast Network Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point SandBlast Network based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, and Fortinet FortiSandbox. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Check Point SandBlast Network surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat prevention features, including zero-day protection, ransomware defense, and real-time malware detection, ensuring superior security for networks against sophisticated threats.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
Check Point SandBlast Network prioritizes zero-day threat prevention with flexible deployment options, ideal for comprehensive network-level protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, focusing on cloud-based anti-phishing and anti-malware solutions.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Report
Check Point SandBlast Network incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more cost-effective setup. Check Point focuses on detailed network security, whereas Microsoft Defender prioritizes seamless integration with Office 365.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point SandBlast Network incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more cost-effective setup. Check Point focuses on detailed network security, whereas Microsoft Defender prioritizes seamless integration with Office 365.
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks WildFire stands out with its rapid updates and seamless Palo Alto NGFW integration, making it ideal for real-time threat adaptation. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network offers superior threat extraction and emulation, excelling in zero-day threat protection across multiple OS platforms.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire Report
Palo Alto Networks WildFire has a significant setup cost, while Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. Differences in pricing structures might impact initial budgeting considerations for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks WildFire has a significant setup cost, while Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. Differences in pricing structures might impact initial budgeting considerations for potential users.
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers affordability and ease of use, making it suitable for various environments with quick threat detection. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network is expensive but delivers substantial value through comprehensive features and integration with SIEM and SOC workflows.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox Report
Fortinet FortiSandbox typically presents a lower setup cost compared to Check Point SandBlast Network, highlighting a cost-effective characteristic. In contrast, Check Point SandBlast may demand a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced feature offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSandbox typically presents a lower setup cost compared to Check Point SandBlast Network, highlighting a cost-effective characteristic. In contrast, Check Point SandBlast may demand a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced feature offerings.
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Network Detection and Response excels with threat analysis via MVX Engine but needs enhancement in false positive reduction. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network offers strong sandboxing capabilities but faces setup complexity issues. Trellix provides excellent support, while Check Point delivers competitive pricing.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report
Trellix Network Detection and Response typically involves lower setup costs compared to Check Point SandBlast Network, which often has a higher initial investment, making Trellix a cost-effective option for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Network Detection and Response typically involves lower setup costs compared to Check Point SandBlast Network, which often has a higher initial investment, making Trellix a cost-effective option for budget-conscious organizations.
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is ideal for those needing comprehensive endpoint security and real-time analysis. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network excels in zero-day threat protection and sandboxing, making it attractive for organizations prioritizing advanced threat isolation and high detection rates.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.

Related categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Email Archiving
Email Security