Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024
Check Point SandBlast Network and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 are leading solutions in the cybersecurity industry, focusing on threat prevention and comprehensive security features. Check Point SandBlast Network has an advantage in proactive threat prevention, while Microsoft Defender is favored for its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: Check Point SandBlast Network offers proactive threat prevention with signature-based and zero-day protection against email, endpoint, and network attacks. It includes sandboxing and threat extraction to sanitize files. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 provides a robust protection suite for Office apps, featuring safe attachments and links, anti-phishing, data loss prevention, and excellent threat visibility. Its seamless integration with Microsoft products enhances its protective capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Check Point SandBlast Network could benefit from broader file type support, improved management interfaces, and better support responsiveness. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 users suggest enhancing threat detection capabilities, simplifying licensing, offering improved awareness tools, and providing more pricing transparency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Check Point SandBlast Network and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offer hybrid and public cloud deployment options. Check Point is noted for robust support but sometimes lengthy technical processes, while Microsoft's integration is praised; however, it faces challenges with customer support efficiency and complex licensing.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network is considered costly, though it offers substantial security benefits and a positive return on investment, possibly saving costs by consolidating tools. Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, often bundled with Office subscriptions, gives good ecosystem value despite standalone expense, with cost concerns particularly noted by smaller organizations.
