Check Point SandBlast Network vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #24. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Broadcom’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Check Point SandBlast Network

Read 41 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

3,537 Views
3,360 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Read 16 Symantec Advanced Threat Protection reviews

2,035 Views
1,689 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Check Point SandBlast Network

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and Check Point SandBlast Network are cybersecurity solutions competing in threat protection. Check Point seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features like zero-day protection and threat emulation.

Features: Symantec includes real-time threat analysis, email protection, and efficient incident management, alongside extensive documentation and integration capabilities. Check Point offers signature-based and zero-day protection through sandboxing and threat extraction, with capabilities for real-time threat detection and network segregation.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could improve storage efficiency, cloud platform features, and behavioral detection, while Check Point may need to enhance its GUI, reduce configuration complexity, and address performance issues related to resource consumption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec suits on-premises and hybrid environments but needs better response times for tech support. Check Point accommodates hybrid and public clouds and provides responsive support, though improvements in efficiency are necessary.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec offers competitive pricing but has been seen as more expensive due to changes, with positive ROI acknowledgments. Check Point's pricing is high, justified by comprehensive security features, and users appreciate the ROI for its integrated security solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network	3.3%
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection	2.1%
Other	94.6%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Karan Pichlangia

Assistant General Manager at Sunteck Realty Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat analysis has reduced malware incidents and gives our security team more confidence

The best features that Check Point SandBlast Network offers include threat emulation for zero-day attacks, which I truly appreciate, and deep file analysis across multiple OS environments. The deep file analysis from Check Point SandBlast Network makes my daily workflow much easier, as I am able to analyze everything in terms of a report about my network. Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization, as I have seen huge changes with a notable drop in malware incidents, especially with suspicious attachments; it gives the security team confidence that known or zero-day files are checked automatically. Regarding the huge drop in malware incidents, I estimate that it may be around 20%.

Read full review

Dennis O'Reilly

Cyber SecOps Principal at Dotcom Security

Provides end-to-end antivirus protection and has good stability

Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control. It can integrate with other Broadcom solutions, such as Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP. If you want to send an email, it gets scanned through endpoint protection and DLP. We get all Symantec functionality in a single pane.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of its characteristics that we liked the most was its analysis and emulation of activities in the emails since it manages to review them and inspect them if they have an infected attachment."

"It is an efficient and friendly service, giving detailed analysis and centralized detection of events, including zero-day attacks, which are analyzed and managed faithfully."

"The best feature Check Point SandBlast Network offers is real-time threat extraction capabilities, which sanitizes the files, mails, and other content before reaching the end-users."

"Threat Emulation gives networks the necessary protection against unknown threats in files that are attached to emails. The Threat Emulation engine picks up malware at the exploit phase before it enters the network. It quickly quarantines and runs the files in a virtual sandbox, which imitates a standard operating system, to discover malicious behavior before hackers can apply evasion techniques to bypass the sandbox."

"SandBlast Network enhances security by providing advanced threat prevention."

"It saves time with us trying to do the analysis. We use it to try to find out how something got into the network. We use it to stop something before it ever gets in."

"The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services."

"The specific security feature that stands out to me in Check Point SandBlast Network is its real-time protection, which extracts, emulates, and blocks traffic if any malicious signatures are present."

More Check Point SandBlast Network pros

"The Application Control code and the easy integration are valuable features."

"Technical support is very responsive. You just have to open a ticket. They respond in a timely manner. Their response is good. I'm satisfied."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"Endpoint to network is a good feature, it can protect the line."

"You don't have to buy a separate email security platform. You can enable that using their endpoint, and I like that. You don't have to have two agents running on the same box."

"Currently we have 800-plus nodes connected with this solution, without any issues. The solution is scalable."

"The incident management on the solution is very good. You get a lot of detailed information about an incident. You also get a lot of documentation in connection with the CVI or integration."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection pros

Cons

"The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as they are sometimes late with their responses."

"There is a limit on the number of files that can be scanned in real-time, which could lead to us being found with our guard down on a high-traffic day."

"When we enable sandboxing for all users, the CPU utilization of the firewall increases significantly, which could be improved."

"SandBlast takes longer than FortiSandbox to complete a scan."

"I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product."

"Check Point SandBlast Network can improve the integration with third-party vendors, such as EDR or CRM products. For example, IBM Curator."

"Firstly, performance in our case daily many emails were queued for scanning and among that 30% of emails were getting skipped, meaning delivered without scanning."

"There have been a couple of things that we've tried where we read through the documentation, and we were really looking for some help in implementing, and technical support wanted me to try it first, then call them if it breaks. It would be nicer if they would hold my hand a bit more. It makes me nervous in production, as I don't have a lab."

More Check Point SandBlast Network cons

"The support for new OSs and older OSs could be a little tighter. They need to be more upfront about what protection services they're going to provide on new OSs. I haven't seen the Windows 11 version out yet. It is either already released in Beta, or the Beta will be released soon. There could be a little bit more advanced updates on what they're doing to help protect Windows 11 environments. They can let us know in advance so that we know it is going to be protected. We can't roll out the new OS without putting end-point protection on it. So, they should tell us what is their support model for that, and what are they doing to protect Windows 11. They're not telling me, and that's a criticism. The same issue is applicable to all the other antivirus tools. It is not just Symantec; all of them have this problem."

"Symantec appliances need improvement. The whole appliance environment is a robust system and it needs a massive amount of storage space. If you have to increase or speed up the background storage it's a pretty complicated process. The scalability and sizing is critical, and if you do it wrong you run into issues pretty quickly."

"There are limits with respect to blocking files by hash value or blocking IP addresses, and these limits should be removed."

"It should be able to collect information if the agent is disabled."

"The security features need to be improved."

"The cloud platform needs to have improvement in terms of the user interface and the different capabilities it has available. It needs to match the other leading next-gen EDR products that are available in the market. That's the reason why we are stepping away from Symantec. Their cloud environment is just generally lacking in comparison to others."

"The administration interface needs a lot of improvement. It should be UI based, and simple. They need to improve it. It's pretty much not that friendly compared to what we were using as Bitdefender before. It's okay but is improving, actually."

"An improvement could be made on the reporting because then it would be easier to collect information and submit it for compliance."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."

"The product's cost is high."

"We have seen ROI."

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection has an average price."

"Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's pricing is comparable."

"The pricing of this solution is inexpensive and affordable."

"The price is quite expensive."

"Pricing is good. It is nice to have a great product at a fair price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?

I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 21% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 14% of the time

MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 7% of the time

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network

September 2026

Download Check Point SandBlast Network product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

August 2026

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report

Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection product report

Overview

Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.

Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.

What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Continuously monitors threats as they appear.
Sandboxing: Detects zero-day attacks by emulating files safely.
AI-Powered Analysis: Uses artificial intelligence for deeper threat insights.
Threat Extraction: Delivers clean files while keeping originals for analysis.
Email and Web Scanning: Effective in sanitizing both emails and web downloads.
Phishing and Ransomware Protection: Shields against phishing attempts and ransomware.

What benefits should users expect from using Check Point SandBlast Network?

Comprehensive Security: Ensures thorough protection across infrastructures.
Minimal Disruption: Reduces the impact of malicious files and downloads on operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing security measures and tools.
Maintains Original Files: Keeps original files for further analysis, enhancing threat detection accuracy.

Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides comprehensive security measures, offering real-time threat analysis and endpoint protection to defend against both traditional and emerging threats, ensuring a secure and resilient online environment.

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection integrates seamlessly with existing IT infrastructures to enhance email security, incident management, and network monitoring. With advanced detection capabilities including Zero-Day protection, its stable performance and straightforward setup are appealing. The system also streamlines application control and integrates effectively with SIEM products. Despite requiring enhancements in graphical threat visualization, network-based threat protection, and support for platforms like Windows 11, it remains a robust choice for comprehensive protection against cyber threats.

What features does Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offer?

Real-time Threat Analysis: Instantly detects and analyzes threats as they emerge.
Click-time URL Protection: Prevents malicious URL clicks.
Endpoint Security: Provides robust defense for endpoints.
NetFlow Threat Protection: Analyzes network traffic for threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Protects against unknown vulnerabilities.
SIEM Integration: Seamlessly works with SIEM products for enhanced monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Protects against both traditional and emerging threats.
Simple Deployment: Easy setup and stable performance simplify integration.
Comprehensive Documentation: Offers in-depth guidance and data analysis.
Email and Network Protection: Strengthens defenses on critical fronts.
Multi-Platform Support: Effective for cloud and hybrid deployments.

In financial sectors, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is widely used to shield endpoint devices and secure email communications. Its capabilities are crucial for safeguarding workstations and servers, providing antivirus, malware, and network threat protection to ensure client data in banking and finance remains safe from advanced threats.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

ECI

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.