Check Point SandBlast Network vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Broadcom is ranked #26. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Broadcom’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Check Point SandBlast Network

Read 41 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

3,315 Views
3,149 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Read 16 Symantec Advanced Threat Protection reviews

1,853 Views
1,519 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Check Point SandBlast Network

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and Check Point SandBlast Network are cybersecurity solutions competing in threat protection. Check Point seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features like zero-day protection and threat emulation.

Features: Symantec includes real-time threat analysis, email protection, and efficient incident management, alongside extensive documentation and integration capabilities. Check Point offers signature-based and zero-day protection through sandboxing and threat extraction, with capabilities for real-time threat detection and network segregation.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could improve storage efficiency, cloud platform features, and behavioral detection, while Check Point may need to enhance its GUI, reduce configuration complexity, and address performance issues related to resource consumption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec suits on-premises and hybrid environments but needs better response times for tech support. Check Point accommodates hybrid and public clouds and provides responsive support, though improvements in efficiency are necessary.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec offers competitive pricing but has been seen as more expensive due to changes, with positive ROI acknowledgments. Check Point's pricing is high, justified by comprehensive security features, and users appreciate the ROI for its integrated security solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Advanced Threat Pr...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.3%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network	3.3%
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection	2.0%
Other	94.7%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Karan Pichlangia

Assistant General Manager at Sunteck Realty Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat analysis has reduced malware incidents and gives our security team more confidence

The best features that Check Point SandBlast Network offers include threat emulation for zero-day attacks, which I truly appreciate, and deep file analysis across multiple OS environments. The deep file analysis from Check Point SandBlast Network makes my daily workflow much easier, as I am able to analyze everything in terms of a report about my network. Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization, as I have seen huge changes with a notable drop in malware incidents, especially with suspicious attachments; it gives the security team confidence that known or zero-day files are checked automatically. Regarding the huge drop in malware incidents, I estimate that it may be around 20%.

Read full review

Dennis O'Reilly

Cyber SecOps Principal at Dotcom Security

Provides end-to-end antivirus protection and has good stability

Symantec Endpoint Protection provides end-to-end protection. Along with antivirus protection, it has a lot of key areas, including intrusive prevention, firewall features, and application and device control. It can integrate with other Broadcom solutions, such as Symantec Messaging Gateway and Symantec DLP. If you want to send an email, it gets scanned through endpoint protection and DLP. We get all Symantec functionality in a single pane.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SandBlast updates the threat signatures frequently."

"SandBlast has opened us up to a lot more opportunities where we can offer this service to clients, that way they don't have to go to a third-party to get this specific solution. It comes in the Check Point Infinity Package so it has helped us a lot."

"Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted our organization by reducing incidents, improving user confidence, and saving time since implementing it. With around 2,000 users in our organization, after deploying threat emulation for network security, we haven't seen any incidents, including zero-day or ransomware attacks."

"Very few false positives are detected, which gives the confidence to raise flags when needed, ensuring the IT department is aware of threats and acting fast."

"Working for a Check Point partner we utilise Check Point's endpoint solution in our day to day work and the most valuable benefit is knowing I am being protected from email, endpoint and removable media attacks and when attacks occur I am likely to weather the storm better than other users."

"It looks out for new cyber threats and generates predictions based on behaviors that are already detected on a daily basis."

"The specific security feature that stands out to me in Check Point SandBlast Network is its real-time protection, which extracts, emulates, and blocks traffic if any malicious signatures are present."

"It seems like it works all the time. We have never had an issue. We have never had something go undetected, anything major. All in all, it works pretty well."

More Check Point SandBlast Network pros

"They manage to solve detection quite nicely, with rather elaborate detection compared to other providers, and Symantec also provides a useful set of information linked to each of the attacked computers."

"The product integrates well with our systems, and we have not encountered any problems."

"It has certainly helped out our audit efforts because we each stay compliant in terms of various security standards."

"What I like most about Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is its notification capability."

"The great advantage in using this product is it creates multiple services."

"The most valuable feature is Click-time URL protection."

"Their integrations are pretty good as are their Sandbox solutions, their proxies, and their LTAs with API or ICAP protocols."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow threat protection."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection pros

Cons

"We would like to see this solution reach mobile devices more efficiently, through apps or more specific products."

"EDR and EPM solutions like Carbon Black or CyberArk have integrations with the cloud version of Sandblast, however, there must be on-premise Sandblast options also (due to the fact that there are regulations for cloud usage restrictions in some countries)."

"If any file is more than 15 GB, the inspection takes some time, so that can be reduced to make real-time protection much faster."

"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."

"There is a limit on the number of files that can be scanned in real-time, which could lead to us being found with our guard down on a high-traffic day."

"We have found a need for the application to be a bit more elastic, bringing it to SAS services and not IAS."

"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."

"It has some performance overhead, as sandboxing takes time and real-time delivery depends on threat extraction, requiring high performance."

More Check Point SandBlast Network cons

"An improvement could be made on the reporting because then it would be easier to collect information and submit it for compliance."

"It also needs network-based threat protection for shared folders and files."

"It's a strange situation where the infrastructure of the consumer or customer is behind some kind of firewall and they have always used some kind of customized proxy. In this situation, the ATP has a very tough time to pass the information to the cloud and back. To fix, it requires a more elaborate and complex configuration for that particular case."

"Symantec appliances need improvement. The whole appliance environment is a robust system and it needs a massive amount of storage space. If you have to increase or speed up the background storage it's a pretty complicated process. The scalability and sizing is critical, and if you do it wrong you run into issues pretty quickly."

"One area for improvement could be the pricing model."

"There are some ‎features that would add value to this product. One of them would be a graphical presentation of threats that the system has encountered."

"I think SonicWall and McAfee are better solutions."

"The administration interface needs a lot of improvement. It should be UI based, and simple. They need to improve it. It's pretty much not that friendly compared to what we were using as Bitdefender before. It's okay but is improving, actually."

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

"The product's cost is high."

"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."

"We have seen ROI."

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

"Pricing is good. It is nice to have a great product at a fair price."

"The price is quite expensive."

"Symantec Endpoint Protection has an average price."

"Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's pricing is comparable."

"The pricing of this solution is inexpensive and affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?

I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

One area for improvement could be the pricing model. Future releases could further enhance integration capabilities with other platforms and simplify the licensing model to compete more with Micros...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

Our primary use case for the product is to provide advanced threat protection to our clients, primarily in the banking and financial sectors.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Symantec Advanced Threat Protection?

Symantec ATP has proven to be a reliable and effective solution. I rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 15% of the time

MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Morphisec vs Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network

August 2026

Download Check Point SandBlast Network product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

July 2026

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report

Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection product report

Overview

Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.

Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.

What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Continuously monitors threats as they appear.
Sandboxing: Detects zero-day attacks by emulating files safely.
AI-Powered Analysis: Uses artificial intelligence for deeper threat insights.
Threat Extraction: Delivers clean files while keeping originals for analysis.
Email and Web Scanning: Effective in sanitizing both emails and web downloads.
Phishing and Ransomware Protection: Shields against phishing attempts and ransomware.

What benefits should users expect from using Check Point SandBlast Network?

Comprehensive Security: Ensures thorough protection across infrastructures.
Minimal Disruption: Reduces the impact of malicious files and downloads on operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing security measures and tools.
Maintains Original Files: Keeps original files for further analysis, enhancing threat detection accuracy.

Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides comprehensive security measures, offering real-time threat analysis and endpoint protection to defend against both traditional and emerging threats, ensuring a secure and resilient online environment.

Symantec Advanced Threat Protection integrates seamlessly with existing IT infrastructures to enhance email security, incident management, and network monitoring. With advanced detection capabilities including Zero-Day protection, its stable performance and straightforward setup are appealing. The system also streamlines application control and integrates effectively with SIEM products. Despite requiring enhancements in graphical threat visualization, network-based threat protection, and support for platforms like Windows 11, it remains a robust choice for comprehensive protection against cyber threats.

What features does Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offer?

Real-time Threat Analysis: Instantly detects and analyzes threats as they emerge.
Click-time URL Protection: Prevents malicious URL clicks.
Endpoint Security: Provides robust defense for endpoints.
NetFlow Threat Protection: Analyzes network traffic for threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Protects against unknown vulnerabilities.
SIEM Integration: Seamlessly works with SIEM products for enhanced monitoring.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Protects against both traditional and emerging threats.
Simple Deployment: Easy setup and stable performance simplify integration.
Comprehensive Documentation: Offers in-depth guidance and data analysis.
Email and Network Protection: Strengthens defenses on critical fronts.
Multi-Platform Support: Effective for cloud and hybrid deployments.

In financial sectors, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is widely used to shield endpoint devices and secure email communications. Its capabilities are crucial for safeguarding workstations and servers, providing antivirus, malware, and network threat protection to ensure client data in banking and finance remains safe from advanced threats.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

ECI

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

August 2026

Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.