Check Point SandBlast Network vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Veritas are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Veritas is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Veritas’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Check Point SandBlast Network

Read 41 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

3,315 Views
3,149 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Read 14 Veritas Alta SaaS Protection reviews

3,132 Views
908 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Check Point SandBlast Network

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Check Point SandBlast Network and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection compete in the advanced security solutions category. Check Point appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive threat prevention features and robust security capabilities, though Veritas is noted for its seamless integration and ease of use within cloud environments.

Features: Check Point SandBlast Network offers advanced threat prevention with features like zero-day threat protection, sandboxing, and threat extraction. It efficiently mitigates email, endpoint, and network security threats. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection provides comprehensive backup and recovery with user-friendly interfaces and strong cloud integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Check Point SandBlast Network could enhance support for diverse file types, customization options, and interface usability. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection should consider refining its pricing strategy and technical support, addressing complexities in licensing and service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network supports diverse deployments, including hybrid and on-premises, with noted inconsistencies in support. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection offers straightforward integration for public clouds but faces challenges with technical support and issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network is viewed as costly yet offers significant ROI through comprehensive security features. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection has mid-range pricing, perceived as fair by some, but others express concerns about its cost versus feature set. Both solutions offer valuable security and operational confidence.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (19th), SaaS Management Platforms (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.3%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is 1.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network	3.3%
Veritas Alta SaaS Protection	1.7%
Other	95.0%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Karan Pichlangia

Assistant General Manager at Sunteck Realty Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat analysis has reduced malware incidents and gives our security team more confidence

The best features that Check Point SandBlast Network offers include threat emulation for zero-day attacks, which I truly appreciate, and deep file analysis across multiple OS environments. The deep file analysis from Check Point SandBlast Network makes my daily workflow much easier, as I am able to analyze everything in terms of a report about my network. Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization, as I have seen huge changes with a notable drop in malware incidents, especially with suspicious attachments; it gives the security team confidence that known or zero-day files are checked automatically. Regarding the huge drop in malware incidents, I estimate that it may be around 20%.

Read full review

Sammy Githinji

Technical Manager at Rigor Systems Limited

Experience with offsite backup enhances data integrity and reduces on-premise reliance

One of the features of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection that customers are looking for is immutability. This is the most important feature. With the cloud, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is actually in the cloud, which means they have unlimited space to do their backups. They can expand on a need-to-need basis. The automated recovery feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection makes the recovery much easier, as opposed to earlier methods where we were using scripts to do the restore. Currently, it's automated so you just do a click. You select the feature in a graphical interface, making it easy to use even for a newbie.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product protects us against the most common and sophisticated attacks including phishing email, account takeover, protection against malicious files, malicious attachments, and malware."

"SandBlast has improved my organization in the way that we no longer have to worry as much about attachments which come in."

"Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization as it's very accurate and gives almost no false positives, providing excellent threat prevention and protecting against server zero-day attacks."

"The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."

"It saves time with us trying to do the analysis. We use it to try to find out how something got into the network. We use it to stop something before it ever gets in."

"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."

"We have never had a case of a virus entering our company computer and I think we are safe because of this solution."

"I have seen both money and time saved as a return on investment."

More Check Point SandBlast Network pros

"he most valuable feature is that it's not so intrusive with computer resources."

"I think the most important feature is the ability of SaaS Backup to cover all modules proposed by Office 365, because competing solutions don't cover the total scope."

"It offers general business continuity and disaster recovery for the industry."

"It's a good solution. It's pretty stable."

"The solution is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems over the past five years of use."

"What I like most about Veritas SaaS Backup is that it is easy to work on and has compatible features."

"The automated recovery feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection makes the recovery much easier, as opposed to earlier methods where we were using scripts to do the restore."

"I would recommend this solution because it covers the total scope of Office 365."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection pros

Cons

"It has some performance overhead, as sandboxing takes time and real-time delivery depends on threat extraction, requiring high performance."

"The initial setup was complex because of the lack of information from the consultant."

"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."

"In Check Point SandBlast, improvement has to be made with respect to the GUI."

"We have found a need for the application to be a bit more elastic, bringing it to SAS services and not IAS."

"The response times were slower, and getting support personnel on the call was more difficult."

"I think Check Point provides standard time which ideally most other vendors take to identify behaviors of a file by sending them into a sandbox environment for inspection."

"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."

More Check Point SandBlast Network cons

"The technical team wasn't very helpful."

"The go-between is a Veritas partner, so the customer support was not that good."

"Licensing has been a struggle. It went from bronze, silver to gold. Licensing needs more sophistication. It has features that are sold as separate add-ons."

"When you finish a project, the client should have the opportunity to browse the files rather than simply ending the contract. Also, it's not possible to recover earlier versions. It should be possible to have a database for recovering files after you finish a contract. There's no solution for this from Veritas."

"The program is quite expensive and I am not impressed by their technical support."

"The usability of the solution isn't the best."

"The go-between is a Veritas partner, so the customer support was not that good. The solution is fine except when there is a purchasing crisis where you have to remake the ecosystem. It causes a lot of issues. The support was a problem, but we're okay with it as long as we have someone to communicate with."

"They should review the cost aspect of the subscription for Veritas Alta SaaS Protection because customers are going for the cheaper storage, which doesn't give those features in terms of dedup ratios."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

"We have seen ROI."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."

"The product's cost is high."

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."

"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

"The tool is expensive compared to Veeam."

"The program is quite expensive."

"I would rate this solution's pricing as five out of five."

"SaaS Backup isn't the most expensive solution."

"This solution is not cheap and not expensive but priced in the mid-range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?

I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is slightly expensive, but they can do more on it. The exact figure for Veritas Alta SaaS Protection depends on the size of data being stored, the region, and the type ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, the only challenge is downtime and the impact of time synchronization whereby different customers are on different time zones, and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For the customers that I'm dealing with, they are using Veritas Alta SaaS Protection for long-term retention and offline backups. This means they don't have to constrain their on-premise resources....

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 15% of the time

MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Backup vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network

August 2026

Download Check Point SandBlast Network product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

July 2026

Download Veritas Alta SaaS Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

SaaS Backup

Overview

Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.

Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.

What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Continuously monitors threats as they appear.
Sandboxing: Detects zero-day attacks by emulating files safely.
AI-Powered Analysis: Uses artificial intelligence for deeper threat insights.
Threat Extraction: Delivers clean files while keeping originals for analysis.
Email and Web Scanning: Effective in sanitizing both emails and web downloads.
Phishing and Ransomware Protection: Shields against phishing attempts and ransomware.

What benefits should users expect from using Check Point SandBlast Network?

Comprehensive Security: Ensures thorough protection across infrastructures.
Minimal Disruption: Reduces the impact of malicious files and downloads on operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing security measures and tools.
Maintains Original Files: Keeps original files for further analysis, enhancing threat detection accuracy.

Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection delivers simplicity, robust duplication, and extensive Office 365 support. It integrates seamlessly with EMC, offers competitive pricing, automated recovery, and a user-friendly interface. Users benefit from its comprehensive capabilities and automated processes.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is distinguished by its high-end dashboard, security features, and immutability functionality. It supports hybrid and cloud environments, providing extensive storage and easy configuration. Stability and non-intrusive resource use enhance user satisfaction, while organizations primarily employ it for backing up Office 365 environments, Linux servers, and virtual machines. Offering data protection, disaster recovery, and business continuity, Veritas aids in long-term retention and offline backups, cutting dependency on on-premise resources and infrastructure. It supports migrations to SharePoint and centralizes backup operations efficiently.

What are the key features of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection?

Simplicity of Use: Designed to be intuitive, reducing learning time and operational costs.
Office 365 Coverage: Comprehensive module support enhances cloud-based collaborations.
Seamless Integration with EMC: Ensures compatibility and enhances capabilities.
Automated Recovery: Streamlines restoration ensuring quick data access.
Security Features: Strong security architecture safeguards sensitive data.
Immutability Functionality: Protects data against unauthorized changes or deletions.

What benefits should users consider in user reviews?

Stability: Consistent performance reduces downtime risks.
Ease of Administration: Simplifies management with minimal intervention.
Non-Intrusive Resource Use: Efficient operation reduces system load.
Comprehensive Capabilities: Wide-ranging features meet diverse business needs.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is employed across industries for secure data protection and recovery, particularly in sectors requiring reliable Office 365 integration, such as education and healthcare. Organizations in these sectors benefit from the solution's automated processes and centralized backup to maintain business continuity and data empowerment. Companies also utilize Veritas for efficient infrastructure transition, enabling them to migrate to cloud-based systems seamlessly.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

August 2026

Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.