Check Point SandBlast Network vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline comparison

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Check Point SandBlast Network are competing in the network security space. Gigamon holds the upper hand for organizations prioritizing detailed data insights due to its advanced observability and real-time analytics.

Features: Gigamon offers comprehensive visibility and packet filtering, facilitating detailed traffic inspection and robust analytics for network performance optimization. Check Point provides zero-day threat protection, advanced sandboxing, and excellent integration with other security platforms.

Room for Improvement: Gigamon could enhance its intelligence for traffic flow analysis and optimize setup complexity. Users suggest offering more integrated security features and user-friendly interfaces. Check Point could focus on improving its reporting tools, reducing the setup time, and enhancing integration with non-Check Point systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gigamon provides flexible deployment for cloud and on-premise environments with strong customer support. Check Point emphasizes seamless integration and a simple deployment process, backed by dedicated support teams to ensure smooth operations.

Pricing and ROI: Gigamon initially requires a larger investment but justifies this with a significant return on investment through enhanced analytics and reduced incidents. Check Point offers competitive pricing, focusing on cost-effective threat management that results in substantial ROI by minimizing security breaches.