Check Point SandBlast Network and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management compete in network security and vulnerability management. Microsoft Defender has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features despite Check Point’s strong protection capabilities.
Features: Check Point SandBlast Network provides advanced threat prevention, real-time threat extraction, and sandboxing. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offers robust vulnerability assessment tools, and provides extensive security operations.
Room for Improvement: Check Point SandBlast Network could enhance integration with third-party tools, improve threat intelligence sharing, and optimize resource usage. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management might benefit from expanding support for additional platforms, improving customization options, and enhancing user interface design.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network supports straightforward deployment with integrated support channels. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management simplifies deployment with cloud-based integration and proactive customer service to ensure a seamless customer experience.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network incurs higher initial setup costs, offering satisfactory ROI through effectiveness. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides attractive ROI with utility-driven pricing, supported by its extensive feature set.
Protecting around 2,000 users from cyber threats, including ransomware, has positively impacted the organization's growth by reducing disruptions and business loss.
I have seen both money and time saved as a return on investment.
As a Microsoft partner, we receive significant discounts, making the solution affordable for us.
They are sometimes responsive, however, often issues cannot be reproduced on their end, making it challenging.
The support we receive from Microsoft is declining, and for example, after taking advanced support, we have not received satisfactory answers.
My team raised multiple support tickets for the product, and we were able to get responses from Microsoft support team.
The scalability of Check Point SandBlast Network meets our organization's needs as we grow.
It is scalable; I evaluated the product and decided to use Defender on over 700 of our company servers.
There are compatibility issues occasionally arising with false positives when other security tools are not whitelisted in Microsoft Defender.
It is very resource-intensive, consuming a lot of memory and CPU.
I would rate the overall stability as an eight.
Simplification of granular tuning for false positive reduction and bypassing benign files would benefit non-expert users.
Check Point SandBlast Network can be improved by adding more integration capabilities, such as integration with third-party firewalls, third-party EDR solutions, and SIEM.
This scoring should be for specific industries as well. If I belong to the healthcare industry using Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, it should provide me with a risk score and show how I fare against the risk score of my industry.
A vulnerability I patch within 15 minutes takes 24 additional hours for an update.
The product is not stable; it often uses excessive memory and CPU, which makes it slow.
Pricing is a bit costly, but considering the features and security offered by Check Point SandBlast Network, it is reasonable.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
The pricing is reasonable, and it's included in the whole Microsoft E5 bundle, so it's all-inclusive.
The key features of Check Point SandBlast Network include its ability to detect zero-day attacks, provide sandboxing capabilities, and offer real-time protection with threat extraction.
It's effective in meeting the specific needs of customers through deployment and integration.
The main advantage of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is that it can locate and prevent most threats even when the endpoints are not connected to the corporate network, as long as the internet is available.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
The integration with Sentinel has been one of the most valuable features for my organization.
Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, manage patches, and fortify threat detection. It offers endpoint assessments, cloud incident management, and dynamic security through Microsoft's Security Scorecard integration.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for advanced threat detection and response. It provides robust tools for vulnerability assessment and cloud incident management, integrated with Microsoft's Security Scorecard to enhance dynamic security profiling. Key features include automatic patch deployment, security configuration management, and seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, benefiting both on-prem and cloud environments. Organizations can track vulnerabilities with severity-based reports, helping manage outdated software and minimizing threat exposure.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?In healthcare, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management helps manage compliance with health regulations, while in finance, it aids in securing sensitive data from cyber threats. Manufacturing sectors benefit from its patch management, keeping operational technology systems less vulnerable to disruptions.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
