Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.1. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 4.0% mindshare in ATP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Check Point SandBlast Network
Read 40 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews
  • 1,051 Views
  • 967 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Read 15 Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management reviews
  • 3,670 Views
  • 110 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Check Point SandBlast Network and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management compete in network security and vulnerability management. Microsoft Defender has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features despite Check Point’s strong protection capabilities.

Features: Check Point SandBlast Network provides advanced threat prevention, real-time threat extraction, and sandboxing. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offers robust vulnerability assessment tools, and provides extensive security operations.

Room for Improvement: Check Point SandBlast Network could enhance integration with third-party tools, improve threat intelligence sharing, and optimize resource usage. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management might benefit from expanding support for additional platforms, improving customization options, and enhancing user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network supports straightforward deployment with integrated support channels. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management simplifies deployment with cloud-based integration and proactive customer service to ensure a seamless customer experience.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network incurs higher initial setup costs, offering satisfactory ROI through effectiveness. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides attractive ROI with utility-driven pricing, supported by its extensive feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
SandBlast Network boosted ROI by enhancing security, reducing incidents, and increasing productivity through advanced threat protection and filtering.
Sentiment score
5.6
Determining ROI from Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is challenging due to package inclusion and unclear financial benefits.
Protecting around 2,000 users from cyber threats, including ransomware, has positively impacted the organization's growth by reducing disruptions and business loss.
I have seen both money and time saved as a return on investment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
As a Microsoft partner, we receive significant discounts, making the solution affordable for us.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
MW
reviewer2699931 - PeerSpot reviewer
II
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Check Point SandBlast Network support is generally effective, with high ratings but some users desire faster responses and proactive guidance.
Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Defender's customer service receives mixed reviews, highlighting inconsistent support and varying effectiveness in technical assistance.
The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as they are sometimes late with their responses.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
They are sometimes responsive, however, often issues cannot be reproduced on their end, making it challenging.
The support we receive from Microsoft is declining, and for example, after taking advanced support, we have not received satisfactory answers.
My team raised multiple support tickets for the product, and we were able to get responses from Microsoft support team.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
reviewer2751732 - PeerSpot reviewerTakayukiUmehara - PeerSpot reviewer
OB
VT
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point SandBlast Network scales well for most organizations, with challenges primarily in larger firms, yet supports robust expansion.
Sentiment score
8.4
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is praised for its high scalability and seamless integration, receiving consistently high user ratings.
The scalability of Check Point SandBlast Network meets our organization's needs as we grow.
The scalability of Check Point SandBlast Network is very nice.
It is scalable but requires growing the box itself because it is a resource-intensive solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
It is scalable; I evaluated the product and decided to use Defender on over 700 of our company servers.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
MW
reviewer2751732 - PeerSpot reviewerAbnet Tsegaye Belay - PeerSpot reviewerTakayukiUmehara - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Check Point SandBlast Network is generally stable, with reliable performance, some outages, good integration, and effective support solutions.
Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Defender is rated highly stable with 99% availability, despite minor portal, compatibility, logging, and memory issues.
When configured correctly with adequate resources, it functions properly.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
There are compatibility issues occasionally arising with false positives when other security tools are not whitelisted in Microsoft Defender.
It is very resource-intensive, consuming a lot of memory and CPU.
I would rate the overall stability as an eight.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
Abnet Tsegaye Belay - PeerSpot reviewerAbdulrahman Muhammadi - PeerSpot reviewerTakayukiUmehara - PeerSpot reviewer
II
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point SandBlast Network needs better integration, responsiveness, performance, usability, scalability, cost management, setup ease, and false positive reduction.
Microsoft Defender needs improvements in accuracy, customization, integration, resource efficiency, macOS support, user-friendliness, and affordability.
Simplification of granular tuning for false positive reduction and bypassing benign files would benefit non-expert users.
The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as they are sometimes late with their responses.
Check Point SandBlast Network can be improved by adding more integration capabilities, such as integration with third-party firewalls, third-party EDR solutions, and SIEM.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
This scoring should be for specific industries as well. If I belong to the healthcare industry using Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, it should provide me with a risk score and show how I fare against the risk score of my industry.
A vulnerability I patch within 15 minutes takes 24 additional hours for an update.
The product is not stable; it often uses excessive memory and CPU, which makes it slow.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
MW
reviewer2751732 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2699931 - PeerSpot reviewer
KR
Abdulrahman Muhammadi - PeerSpot reviewerTakayukiUmehara - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Check Point SandBlast Network involves high initial costs but offers a favorable cost-benefit ratio with negotiation opportunities.
Microsoft Defender offers varying pricing; complex licensing may incur additional costs, but security benefits can justify the investment.
Pricing is a bit costly, but considering the features and security offered by Check Point SandBlast Network, it is reasonable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
The pricing is reasonable, and it's included in the whole Microsoft E5 bundle, so it's all-inclusive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
MW
VT
II
LS
 

Valuable Features

Check Point SandBlast Network offers zero-day prevention, real-time protection, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring secure file delivery.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management excels in integration, compliance, risk prioritization, and real-time assessments, enhancing security across diverse environments.
The key features of Check Point SandBlast Network include its ability to detect zero-day attacks, provide sandboxing capabilities, and offer real-time protection with threat extraction.
Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization as it's very accurate and gives almost no false positives, providing excellent threat prevention and protecting against server zero-day attacks.
It detects zero-day exploits in suspicious and normal files, and includes forensic and reporting features that provide detailed incident analysis, malware behavior reports, and indicators of compromise.
For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point SandBlast Network report
The main advantage of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is that it can locate and prevent most threats even when the endpoints are not connected to the corporate network, as long as the internet is available.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
The integration with Sentinel has been one of the most valuable features for my organization.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report
MW
reviewer2751732 - PeerSpot reviewerAbnet Tsegaye Belay - PeerSpot reviewer
KR
VT
Dermot O'Doherty - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerab...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (12th), Microsoft Security Suite (20th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 4.0%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network4.0%
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management1.2%
Other94.8%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

Abnet Tsegaye Belay - PeerSpot reviewer
Has prevented zero-day attacks by analyzing and disarming suspicious files before delivery
Check Point SandBlast Network offers wide protocol coverage. It inspects emails through SMTP, POP3, and IMAP, web downloads through HTTP and HTTPS, and file transfers. Original files are analyzed in the sandbox while users get clean copies instantly to their inbox. It detects zero-day exploits in suspicious and normal files, and includes forensic and reporting features that provide detailed incident analysis, malware behavior reports, and indicators of compromise. The wide protocol coverage is particularly valuable because suspicious activities happen across different protocols. With Check Point SandBlast Network supporting multiple protocols, there is strong protection for our networks. Since implementing Check Point SandBlast Network, we have gained enhancement in our email and web security. It protects our files, complies with different standards, and reduces lateral movement in our networks.
Read full review
NaySan @ Suraj Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides actionable vulnerability insights and recommendations with notable efficiency
They may need to improve the portal refresh rate for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management because it takes time for recommendations to disappear after mitigation; sometimes, it takes one week, when it should ideally take only one to two hours. Overall, everything is good with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, but the portal refresh rate can take up to seven days in some cases and three or four days in others to reflect changes.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point SandBlast Network?
The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?
I'm not in charge of costing regarding Check Point SandBlast Network, so I cannot comment on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?
Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as sometimes the cost can be limiting even if the feature is very nice, and the UI can be optimized. The customer support for Check Point SandBlast N...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
I would rate the price as a three for us due to the partnership discounts. For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
I have not thought about improvements for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management as of now, but this is typically an operational maintenance process. The operational maintenance process refers...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 52% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 39% of the time
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 9% of the time
More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors
Qualys VMDR vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys VMDR vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Compared 23% of the time
Tenable Nessus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Nessus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Compared 21% of the time
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Compared 17% of the time
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Compared 4% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
October 2025
Check Point SandBlast Network reportDownload Check Point SandBlast Network product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
September 2025
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management reportDownload Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management product report
 

Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

Check Point Software Technologies

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, manage patches, and fortify threat detection. It offers endpoint assessments, cloud incident management, and dynamic security through Microsoft's Security Scorecard integration.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for advanced threat detection and response. It provides robust tools for vulnerability assessment and cloud incident management, integrated with Microsoft's Security Scorecard to enhance dynamic security profiling. Key features include automatic patch deployment, security configuration management, and seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, benefiting both on-prem and cloud environments. Organizations can track vulnerabilities with severity-based reports, helping manage outdated software and minimizing threat exposure.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?
  • Compliance: Ensures adherence to security regulations.
  • Recommendations: Provides actionable advice for security enhancements.
  • Inventories: Offers detailed inventory tracking for software and hardware.
  • Threat Identification: Detects potential threats proactively.
  • Vulnerability Assessment: Evaluates system vulnerabilities comprehensively.
  • Zero-day Protection: Shields systems from newly discovered exploits.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Integration: Facilitates seamless integration with Microsoft and diverse platforms.
  • Risk Mitigation: Assists in mitigating risks through accurate assessments.
  • Prioritization: Helps prioritize vulnerabilities for efficient patch management.
  • Up-to-date Protection: Ensures systems remain secured and current.

In healthcare, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management helps manage compliance with health regulations, while in finance, it aids in securing sensitive data from cyber threats. Manufacturing sectors benefit from its patch management, keeping operational technology systems less vulnerable to disruptions.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
September 2025
Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.