Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure - based on our leading OpenStack and virtualization platforms - provides co-located, scalable, software-defined compute and storage, driven by Red Hat Ansible Automation on economical, industry-standard hardware.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure | 2.1% |
| VxRail | 12.4% |
| VMware vSAN | 10.0% |
| Other | 75.5% |
Organizations primarily use Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for virtualizing legacy applications, serving as a small cloud. It supports diverse vertical solutions like banking, oil and gas, and retail. It's utilized in R&D departments for desktop services and land environment centers with interconnected servers. With Red Hat storage and Hypervisor, it manages computing and virtualization workloads, including databases. Depending on user requirements, it accommodates various deployments and is favored by customer-centric companies.
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure was previously known as Red Hat HCI, Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for Virtualization.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Enterprise System Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for 4–5 years; it's stable, container-focused, and great for data consistency, but its high cost in Sri Lanka and limited disaster recovery features could be improved. |
| Team Leader Presales at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | I have used Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for three years. It's scalable with good support and straightforward setup, but could be more user-friendly. I'd recommend it depending on the use case, rating it 7/10. |
| Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 2.0 | I find Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure stable and scalable with amazing support. However, its high initial investment, complex management, and costly professional services lead me to not recommend it, rating it 4/10. |
| IBM Data & IA Technology Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | While I appreciate its consolidated management and documentation, I found this solution extremely complex and not user-friendly, requiring deep technical understanding for implementation. The difficult setup led to a 7/10 rating. |
| Senior Product Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I find this a low-cost, open-source solution with excellent scalability, stability, and customer support. Setup was straightforward, and it's versatile across verticals. However, cloud deployment needs improvement, and VDS support is lacking. |
| Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | <p>I utilize Red Hat as a DaaS in R&D, valuing its real-time workload automation. Though stable and scalable, the CPU-core licensing needs improvement, and multi-cloud management is desired. I recommend it, rating it 9/10.</p> |
| System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | This product is great for our small, compact server setup due to its size. However, it lacks stability, with upgrades causing issues, and its capabilities are limited. Despite good support, I find it isn't fully mature, rating it a seven out of ten. |
