Auvik helps us manage all our devices on the network.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a individual & family service with 201-500 employees
Gives us a single location to investigate network issues, saving us time and work
Pros and Cons
- "With the TrafficInsights option, I have information and statistics regarding our traffic and what is currently being utilized in terms of bandwidth. I use it quite often to establish if our bandwidth is fully utilized or not and whether there is any slowness on the network."
- "I would like to see improvement in terms of its integration with other applications and systems. I know that they are adding new systems. However, there is still work to be done there, such as integration with MS Teams. That is not working great for us."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Because we can do different things in one place, like investigate network issues, it has definitely saved us time; something like 20 percent. It gives us all the necessary data to make a decision in an instant. In addition to saving us time, it saves us work.
It also helps keep device inventories up to date. We are a small team but it helps us delegate low-level tasks to junior staff. And the fact that it tracks inventory gives us visibility into all devices and that obviously helps us keep everything up to date. It saves us about 20 percent of the time we would spend on that otherwise.
What is most valuable?
We've got visibility into all our devices, starting with routers and switches—networking devices—through to printers and user stations as well. It gives us an account of what is currently connected to our network.
And with the TrafficInsights option, I have information and statistics regarding our traffic and what is currently being utilized in terms of bandwidth. I use it quite often to establish if our bandwidth is fully utilized or not and whether there is any slowness on the network.
Another helpful feature is that you can remotely connect to a device directly from Auvik.
Apart from that, it's monitoring software. Obviously, you get alerts and you can configure them, which is a useful feature as well. You don't need to look at the dashboard all the time. Instead, you can rely on the alerting feature. If something goes wrong, you simply get an alert via email.
It provides us with a single, integrated platform. We can do quite a few things from Auvik. We can connect to different devices and we have visibility into what's connected to the network. There is a lot of useful information, like IP address, network address, as well as insight into traffic, time, date, what protocol is being used, and how much bandwidth is being used. It definitely gives us one platform where we can investigate quite a lot of stuff.
Another good feature is the network mapping and topology. It's clearly depicted on the dashboard, so you can see what's connected to what. It's designed well.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see improvement in terms of its integration with other applications and systems. I know that they are adding new systems. However, there is still work to be done there, such as integration with MS Teams. That is not working great for us. And integration with ticketing systems would be helpful. There is an integration module for the big systems, like ServiceNow, but we're using something else and it's not integrated.
Buyer's Guide
Auvik
September 2023

Learn what your peers think about Auvik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2023.
734,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Auvik for around two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. We haven't had any problems from the Auvik side. Updates haven't broken anything. There has been no Auvik downtime. It's all working pretty well.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's definitely scalable. I don't know what the maximum is but we are adding new devices all the time. It depends on how many devices your license covers, but apart from that, there are no real restrictions.
We have one main site with up to 1,000 users at the moment. We also have about 15 external locations, which are like shops, but the majority of our users are working at the main site. We also have some remote solutions, VPN, for the users. It's a hybrid environment with Microsoft Office 365. Most of our stuff is in the cloud along with some on-premises solutions.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's technical support is really good. There are different ways to contact them, including phone, chat, and email. You can easily contact them. They also have a really good knowledge base system where you can actually find resolutions yourself.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We still use multiple applications for managing our network, but nothing specifically like Auvik. Auvik gives us one place to do different things. It's easier to see the information because it is displayed on the dashboard in a nice way.
How was the initial setup?
I was involved in the deployment of Auvik to some degree. It was quite straightforward. They gave us good guidelines and we just followed what was requested of us. If we were in doubt, we could always go back to them, and they would guide us through the process. Overall, the process was quite straightforward.
I don't remember how long the onboarding process took. I think it was about one month. It involved two people from our side. One was our senior infrastructure engineer, who is my colleague, and me, as IT infrastructure engineer.
It doesn't require any maintenance. Everything is in the cloud. Apart from updates from Auvik, we don't really have to touch it or maintain anything.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not involved on the cost side of our solutions, but the price must be good enough because we have renewed the license.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I wasn't involved in the decision-making process, but I would guess that cost was really important, as we are a charity. If not the most important, the cost of the system would be one of the deciding factors.
I've used SolarWinds in the past, and Auvik is definitely a good system to have on your network. It helps with your work and saves time. I would definitely recommend it.
What other advice do I have?
It's not too difficult to use Auvik's monitoring and management functions. There are quite a few settings and a lot of information. In the beginning, it can be a bit overwhelming. There are a lot of tabs on the left-hand side. But, the longer you use it, the easier it becomes. Ease of use is definitely not the first thing we look at. It's a bonus feature. The primary purpose of Auvik is to monitor our network. As long as that's being done, that's our priority. If it's easy to use, of course, that's more convenient. It is a big plus. But it's not our first priority.
I would advise going to the Auvik Training Portal where you can go through a lot of videos and short modules. You can learn more advanced techniques for using Auvik, and maybe a little bit about the more advanced settings you can use. The solution has many options and settings, so it's good to do some reading and a bit of study to use it to its full potential.
It's a very good solution to have, with loads of information in one place. It helps us in our investigations and saves us a lot of time.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Senior Network Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Allows us to manage our customers and collect configurations, diagnose issues, trace cables, and access devices remotely
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to trace cables is the most valuable feature. The solution provides link detection and port detection features with the switches. It's invaluable to have the ability to see where one device is connected and identify the exact port without having to trace any cables."
- "I like the auto-mapping feature, but I would like to see more layouts and predefined views."
What is our primary use case?
We are a managed service provider, but we look after a couple of thousand customers all over Australia. We look after their total IT solutions, and we use Auvik as a network monitoring platform and alerting engine.
We use Auvik to manage our customers and collect configurations, diagnose issues, trace cables, and access devices remotely. We also use it internally for our own support purposes.
We're an outsourced IT company, so we provide IT to other companies that don't have their own departments or don't have the skills. We might go into a company with an IT department and do projects for them that they don't have the skills or resources to do.
How has it helped my organization?
We will be able to better meet our SLAs with this solution. We have quicker resolution times, and we waste less time on troubleshooting. As an MSP, we charge per user, per month. We charge a fixed fee to our customers, so saved time results in direct profits for us.
The solution's automation has supplemented our IT team's ability. It has saved us in a few niche cases. We're able to access equipment that was otherwise inaccessible.
Auvik helps keep device inventories up to date. We use it with ScalePad, which is a warranty tracking system that generates reports. We use that report and go to our customers and say, "You have five switches that are at end of life and need to be replaced." It helps us a lot.
What is most valuable?
The ability to trace cables is the most valuable feature. The solution provides link detection and port detection features with the switches. It's invaluable to have the ability to see where one device is connected and identify the exact port without having to trace any cables.
It's easy to use the monitoring and management functions. We trained most of our staff on how to administer and monitor the solution without any issues. We have a range of techs from entry-level, all the way to experienced engineers. We haven't found it to be difficult, even with the new people.
Auvik is one of many tools that we use, but it integrates with our other platforms to share data and fit in with our ecosystem.
We have seen time-to-value with Auvik. It has saved us a lot of time. A good example is the automatic configuration backup. One of our customers recently had a switch fail, and it was quite complicated. Reverse engineering what was in place and recreating the configuration would have taken 10 to 20 hours, and the customer would have been down for days. We were able to pull the previous configuration that was automatically generated from Auvik, restore it to a new switch, and have the customer back up within two hours.
What needs improvement?
I like the auto-mapping feature, but I would like to see more layouts and predefined views. At the moment, we're restricted to default views without much customization. The devices and reporting provide a nice map, but it's not at the point where we could generate a 100% accurate topology map because of some of the equipment at some of our customer sites.
The solution doesn't reduce repetitive low-priority tasks through automation as much as we had hoped. The repetitive issues that we see could be solved if Auvik's reporting engine was more configurable. The default reporting is basically limited to what is available out of the box. We can't customize any of the notifications for specific issues. We had to turn off the automatic case generation because it wasn't able to do what we needed it to do.
The reporting engine could definitely be improved, but I've been told that an overhaul is happening.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is great. Every time there's been an outage or an interruption, we've been notified. The uptime is within what we'd expect. No platform is 100% perfect, but it's on par with the market leaders.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We don't have any problems with the scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate technical support a nine out of ten.
Technical support is excellent. I've never had an issue with them. They've always been responsive and more than willing to help.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We evaluated SolarWinds and some other vendors several years ago. We chose Auvik because of the integration with vendors. All of the vendors we use are supported. The instructions on integrations are great. The device communication is easy, and the platform is very intuitive and well-polished. Our only complaint is that it's lacking a few key features, but it has ticked most of the boxes and has required the least amount of overhead.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward. The knowledge base is quite comprehensive. Everything we wanted was documented. If we had any questions, the support team was excellent.
We implemented Auvik out of the box. For accurate results, it took 24 hours after implementation before our network mapping started to populate.
It took 1/10th of the time to set up Auvik compared to other solutions.
Four people were needed for implementation. Their responsibilities were to configure sites. We're an MSP, so we initially deployed Auvik at 50 sites. The tasks were delegated. We have an internal process for everything we do, which includes snippets from the Auvik documentation, but we created our own customized documentation.
I was responsible for project management, documentation creation, and task delegation. I delegated setting up the sites and configuring the sites to our senior engineers, and they deployed Auvik at 50 customer sites.
What about the implementation team?
We're an integrator, so we did the setup ourselves.
What was our ROI?
The solution has saved us time by 80%.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.
There are a few things that are missing that we've been promised in the future and that would make the product excellent for our needs. In terms of what we need, it definitely adds value.
To someone comparing network monitoring solutions but concerned about pricing, my advice is to make sure that the solution fits your needs. Check out the feature set and the reporting, and be realistic about what you expect it to do.
The solution is scalable. You pay for what you use. It's a comprehensive solution to monitor everything. The pricing is fair, and you only pay for what you use and for the devices that are managed by Auvik. It's quite affordable compared to other solutions, and it's scalable.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Buyer's Guide
Auvik
September 2023

Learn what your peers think about Auvik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2023.
734,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Systems Engineer at a mining and metals company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Allows us to monitor all of our virtual machines and switches from one central location and reduces our MTTR
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the ability to see usage alerts on all of our devices."
- "The user interface could be a little bit faster, and there should be a legend in the map."
What is our primary use case?
We needed a solution to monitor all of our systems. We were using another system, but it wasn't up to par. Auvik gives us everything we need plus some. Right now, we're using it to monitor all of our virtual machines and switches. We can do configurations on any of our switches directly through Auvik.
Right now, another engineer and I currently use the solution. We're going to allow other IT staff to view it, but nobody else will have access. There will be another five staff members who will see all of the data.
How has it helped my organization?
We're able to have a visual dashboard in one central location, so we don't need to have multiple dashboards. If we're going to configure an API, we can have it displayed on a board for our team to see. We didn't have anything like that before, so the ability to see insights on a dashboard is very important to our organization.
Auvik has saved us 50% of the time we used to spend because we get notifications fairly quickly.
We have seen a reduction in our MTTR. We notice that some of our devices are going offline five minutes sooner per incident than when we would first get reports.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ability to see usage alerts on all of our devices. That's not just from our servers, but on all of our machines and user computers.
The ability to see utilization at one central location is easier than having multiple windows. We couldn't configure alerts on everything because it just wasn't available. Auvik provided the solution for us.
The use of the monitoring and management functions is of a medium difficulty level. With some aspects like trying to filter devices, it's a little cumbersome to type in the product. You have to click and apply it like a filter. When you click on the search button, it automatically populates it. It's a different step, so it's a little cumbersome and slow. The interface is quite slow, but that's likely due to it being on the cloud.
Auvik provides a single integrated platform. It's very important for us to have a single integrated platform because the interface shows us everything: all of our interfaces, switches, servers, and virtual machines. We can see it all in one central location instead of needing to pull up multiple windows.
Auvik helps us visualize the network mapping and topology for our organization. The ability to see all of our switches and what's connected to the switches is very helpful for us because not only can we see the device, but sometimes we can even see the device name. When we have an issue, we don't have to try to find it with an IP because we can already see the name of the device.
The solution helps reduce repetitive, low-priority tasks through automation. There are certain tasks that we know are repetitive, and we can't do anything because of the way that the system is built. We can suppress those unless they are over a certain threshold. There are other notifications that we always look at when they pop up.
What needs improvement?
The user interface could be a little bit faster, and there should be a legend on the map. Trying to filter devices could be easier. Those are probably the top three improvements I would like them to address.
I would rate the overall intuitiveness of the network visualization an eight out of ten. There are some aspects that could be better mapped out or better described. Some connections are confusing to look at. We don't know why one is yellow and why one is blue. It would be nice to have a legend included on the map.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have worked with Auvik for about two and a half months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is top-notch.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's highly scalable and available because it's on the cloud. As long as the correct configuration is done, it's highly available.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is very good. Our questions were answered right away. It seemed like they already knew what we were going to ask. Maybe they were just judging the situation by the deployments that they've done.
I would rate technical support as ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used Libre, but it wasn't giving us what we needed. Auvik gives us the ability to monitor the network.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward. We implemented Auvik out-of-the-box. It was immediately available to use. The moment we connected our entire network, it was up. There were some configurations that we had to do on the backend, but it was pretty straightforward. The moment we connected, it was immediately available.
We required two people for deployment, including an engineer and myself. Our responsibilities were to make sure that our credentials were correct, our host was the correct address, and that we could connect to it. We also made sure that certain settings were turned on.
It doesn't require maintenance primarily because it's on the cloud, so Auvik takes care of that. If there was any maintenance, it would just be with our devices on our end.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Auvik is fairly priced. The cost is what we expected considering network management. The benefits outweigh the cost for us.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated other options, but they didn't offer what we needed.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight and a half out of ten.
Comparing Auvik's cloud-based solution to an on-premises network monitoring solution, I would rate the usefulness a ten out of ten. I would rate the interface an eight out of ten. I would rate the speed a six out of ten because when it's local and on-premises, it's faster because it doesn't have to go through the cloud or through Amazon.
The benefit outweighs the cost because we're able to see everything in one central location. It gives us one interface to do multiple functions.
The time it took to set up and maintain Auvik was twice as long as our previous network. With our previous solution, we just connected our devices and that was it. Auvik took a lot more time.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Director of Technology at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees
Gives us visibility into clients' networks and sometimes even see issues before the client does
Pros and Cons
- "The fact that it provides a single, integrated platform for our organization is important as well. Having 50 different accounts to log into would make things difficult at times."
- "The visualization of network mapping is good. The only complaint would be that VLANs don't necessarily show up as a regular LAN does. They do show up, but there is some manual tuning you have to do to make that look perfect."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for our clients that have managed network services. We monitor their networks to see if there are any anomalies or unknown devices, and we use it for troubleshooting as needed.
How has it helped my organization?
One of the benefits is the insights into the network. We had one client that was having tons of issues. We put Auvik on there and we were able to isolate the problem to one device, remove it, and everything is now working well.
It has helped with visibility into remote and distributed networks, globally. For those clients that pay for the service, it allows us to see their networks, see what's going on, and sometimes even see an issue before the client knows and calls us, and that is what we want.
We have also seen a reduction in mean time to resolution, of about 10 to 20 percent, depending on what the issue is.
What is most valuable?
I like the traffic insights. That really helps to see what's using your bandwidth.
The monitoring and management functions, while there is a little bit of a learning curve, are pretty easy. Once you get it, it's straightforward and easy to go forward with. That's very important because we don't have time to sit around and try to figure out how to use it, looking at tutorials. It's pretty intuitive and their support is really great too if we have any issues.
And the fact that it provides a single, integrated platform for our organization is important as well. Having 50 different accounts to log into would make things difficult at times.
The overall intuitiveness of the network visualization is great. It makes it easy to see everything and easy to follow and pinpoint what's going on.
What needs improvement?
The visualization of network mapping is good. The only complaint would be that VLANs don't necessarily show up as a regular LAN does. They do show up, but there is some manual tuning you have to do to make that look perfect. That's kind of the nature of how VLANs work, so I don't think there's anything they can really do to help make that better. Still, it does at least pick up devices that are on there, and tries to connect it all, but it doesn't always do a good job.
Also, it doesn't help keep device inventories up to date. It doesn't have any updating features.
For how long have I used the solution?
It has been three years since I started using Auvik.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's reliable. We haven't had any issues with it. We haven't had any downtime because the server wasn't available, or anything like that. It's definitely worth it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It seems to scale really well. When we first started, we just had three clients in there. Now we have it on all 35 of our clients, and some of them have multiple sites. They're not all fully configured, but at least we have the agent on them and we're getting data already. I just need to go into each one and set up the SSH and SNMP settings, but that's no big deal.
It's deployed into our managed network clients who have anywhere from three workstations all the way up to over 300 devices on the multiple VLANs.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support is a 10 out of 10. They have direct support within the platform via a chat and they'll walk you through anything and give you the guidance you need. And their email support is great as well, if you have to escalate something. They'll even do a Zoom call with you if they're not able to resolve it by email or chat. They don't leave you hanging.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't use any solution previously. We just used an ad hoc network scan to try to find issues, but that doesn't really give you a great view of everything.
How was the initial setup?
I'm the one who does the deployments. The setup is straightforward. It's complex in the sense that you have to connect each device and configure its SNMP or SSH settings, but it's pretty straightforward overall.
Depending on the network, within 30 seconds to two minutes, max, the network mapping starts to populate after implementing the collector. It's pretty quick.
It doesn't require much maintenance. Once you get everything set up, unless you introduce new devices, you don't really have to mess with anything.
What about the implementation team?
We did our initial implementation with the Auvik trainer. He helped us onboard clients and gave us training. Our experience with him was good. He was really knowledgeable and helped us out as we needed it.
Initially, it was me and our CEO involved in the implementation, but he passed it off to me after the first couple. And of course, we have had Auvik's help with it as well.
What was our ROI?
Time-to-value from Auvik has been the troubleshooting of that one client I mentioned, just by itself. We spent countless hours onsite trying to figure out what was going on, doing our own tests with freeware, but we weren't able to isolate the issue until we installed Auvik. If we had done that from day one, it would have taken three hours for the setup, instead of that ticket taking 22 hours of work. It's a big benefit.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Auvik's pretty good in terms of pricing. It can get pricey if you have multiple managed devices, but if it's just a simple network with only one or two firewall walls and smart switches, it's reasonable.
The one client that we had issues with has 15 managed devices. That client is pretty expensive, but it's worth it.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Our eyes were set on Auvik, based on reviews from peers.
What other advice do I have?
It's not really replacing any tasks. Rather, it's a good tool to see if the network is down. We have others that do the same thing, but Auvik is more for investigating issues.
My advice is to take your time. Make sure that the credentials are correct when you input them. Go through their guide on setting up WMI for Windows workstations to get better results. Just don't rush it and get good data.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Backs up our clients' switches, meaning we don't have to scramble to reconfigure a failed switch
Pros and Cons
- "It also integrates with our ticketing system. We use ConnectWise and having that integration is valuable for billing and for all-around general management. Having one product that can integrate with everything is valuable because we don't have to worry about building out APIs or custom maps to do that for us."
- "There is room for improvement on the development side. As new devices and models come out from different manufacturers, they aren't always supported by Auvik right away. For example, Sophos switches came out within the past year and we only have CLI support right now for those..."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for monitoring clients' networks.
How has it helped my organization?
One way it has improved our organization is with respect to managing switches for clients. We didn't have a solution before that would back up our clients' switches. So if a switch failed, and we didn't have a safe manual backup somewhere, we were scrambling to figure out what was configured on that switch: Were there VLANs, was there some advanced configuration that we don't have now and that we have to rebuild? With Auvik, we just grab and restore the config file.
There are fewer steps for us to do as an organization. We set the tool up and it does all the work for us. It's taking a lot of that manual leg work out. It has recaptured some time that we can give back to other tasks. I wouldn't say it's a huge amount, but it's still a good chunk of time.
And it has been extremely useful when it comes to visibility into remote and distributed networks, especially managing devices. Being able to log in to a switch without having to log in to a client-server, since you can do that from Auvik, has been extremely helpful for our IT team.
And our MTTR has been reduced by at least 50 percent because, as a switch goes down, we get the alert without having our client call us. We have the alert and we know what's wrong, which is great.
What is most valuable?
I like the switch device configuration backups.
Also, the monitoring and management functions of Auvik are pretty straightforward. I haven't really found too many issues with them. The ease of use is pretty valuable for us.
It also integrates with our ticketing system. We use ConnectWise and having that integration is valuable for billing and for all-around general management. Having one product that can integrate with everything is valuable because we don't have to worry about building out APIs or custom maps to do that for us.
Overall, it's very intuitive and very easy to find help on how to configure things. Their knowledge base is very deep. There are no issues there.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement on the development side. As new devices and models come out from different manufacturers, they aren't always supported by Auvik right away. For example, Sophos switches came out within the past year and we only have CLI support right now for those, so obviously Sophos configs cannot be backed up at this time through Auvik. It's an issue of being more proactive before products are released. I would like to see the manufacturers working with Auvik in advance, before new products come out, to make sure they're supported.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Auvik for three or four years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been great. Obviously, there are planned outages but they warn you about them ahead of time. There has been no issue where we needed to get in there and it was down.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability seems great. We're still a small business and if we had larger clients our experience might be different, but for what we have it has been great.
We have it deployed in multiple locations. Each client's site has a collector installed and they have one, or maybe two, offices.
How are customer service and support?
Auvik's technical support is a seven out of 10.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is really the first product that we've had that does full network monitoring. We used ConnectWise for machine management, but its network capabilities were somewhat limited. That's one reason we chose Auvik. The dynamic map of the network it provides and the ease of troubleshooting were additional reasons. It helps in pinpointing where issues are. When a switch is down we get that alert from Auvik and it definitely saves a lot of time for our help desk.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was pretty straightforward. It's definitely gotten better, but I didn't have any issues setting it up for our organization or for clients. The experience has been the same.
Out-of-the-box, it worked just as it should. After the collector is implemented, within the day the network mapping starts to populate. It's pretty much instantaneous.
Setting up other products was a lot more involved. Another product we used was SolarWinds, but it was something of a bear to set up. It's not really straightforward, out-of-the-box like Auvik. With Auvik we definitely saved on having to research licensing and then install software somewhere. We don't have to do any of that. It's all hosted.
For the most part, maintenance is handled by Auvik. Obviously, if new devices are added to the network, they have to be configured to talk to Auvik. But other than that, you just set it up and it's good to go, unless you change the credentials. Overall, we just set it up and sit back and watch it.
What about the implementation team?
We did it in-house. It was just my boss and me involved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing seems fairly competitive with what may be out there. We haven't looked around too much, but the pricing is very reasonable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We were set on Auvik right away.
What other advice do I have?
Make sure that the networks you're going to be managing with Auvik all have managed switches and that those switches or devices are supported by Auvik.
Auvik does a fairly good job of mapping network topology. It's about 90 percent of what we need. There are some inconsistencies with port mapping. For example, it will discover that this switch is connected to this switch in this port, but sometimes it's inaccurate. There's some work to be done there, but overall, it's been extremely useful for us.
Auvik helps keep device inventories up to date, although that's not generally a time-consuming task with our clients. As an MSP, we handle small to medium-sized businesses. But if we were to grow, that feature would definitely help more.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Team Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We can see connectivity from a bird's eye view without the need to dive into the firewalls and switches
Pros and Cons
- "It's hard to say that one feature is my favorite, but I like Auvik's ability to map networks using SNMP. It maps the network, so I can look at all the devices and set them to provide alerts or automatically create tickets when outages occur. If clients need it, I can export all of the data into an Excel spreadsheet."
- "The search could be slightly more intelligent. If I type in "Dell" and put an extra "L," Auvik doesn't give a suggestion, "Did you mean 'Dell?'" I have to fix that."
What is our primary use case?
I'm a technical team lead managing other engineers and specialists for several clients. I utilize Auvik for strategic discussions, escalations, and support tickets. I'm on the backend trying to coordinate responses to outages, feature requests, etc.
We use multiple applications to manage our network. Auvik is our network mapping and discovery tool that creates alerts in our ticketing system. We use ConnectWise Automate and that suite of products for ticketing. It's not like Auvik is a ticketing help desk system with remote control, but it can do just about everything from a monitoring standpoint. We still use AppNeta for board mirroring or finding latency in network traffic.
How has it helped my organization?
Auvik is a total package for network discovery that completely meets our needs as a company. I don't see us leaving Auvik for some other network discovery tool. It's a one-stop shop where we can dive into each of our client's networks, and we have quite a few. I don't know precisely how many we have. It's fewer than a hundred, but it's too many to do LAN diagrams in Visio.
The solution has reduced repetitive low-priority tasks because it collects the SNMP information for us and alerts us when servers go offline. We can see connectivity in the network from a bird's eye view without the need to dive into the firewalls and switches. Auvik saves us from having to create manual diagrams, and I can export all the data about a client's network, so I don't have to gather all of that myself.
Given our number of clients, we would probably need another full-time engineer if someone had to keep track of all of this on their own. It's roughly equivalent to a human working full-time for an entire year. That's one less person we need for all that, and Auvik reduces human error.
The visibility Auvik provides is critical because it's part of our onboarding process, giving us a high-level overview so long as the client doesn't change the SNMP default values. We can immediately see what a new client is working with as soon as we get off again into their network.
Auvik has improved the team's availability by about 75 percent. Before Auvik, we used a different tool to scan, but it provided only a one-time snapshot of the network, whereas Auvik provides mapping in real-time.
It's probably one of the first tools we introduce to new hires in our network operations center. Auvik is intuitive and offers hints. You can type a vendor name or an IP, and it's immediately accessible at a high level. Of course, there's depth to the product that takes time to develop. Junior engineers can quickly get a look at it, start learning how SNMP works, or configure it on devices and watch them appear in Auvik.
We use Auvik when we're doing strategic planning for clients. It helps us find servers, hosts switches, correct serial numbers, etc., so we can do warranty lookups and that sort of thing. It's important. We primarily use it for information gathering to see a visual network diagram mapping and get tickets.
What is most valuable?
It's hard to say that one feature is my favorite, but I like Auvik's ability to map networks using SNMP. It maps the network, so I can look at all the devices and set them to provide alerts or automatically create tickets when outages occur. If clients need it, I can export all of the data into an Excel spreadsheet.
The monitoring and management functions are easy to use. The network visualization is also intuitive. Ease of use is crucial because many of our help desk specialists and entry-level people need to navigate the solution, so it's vital to have simplicity in standard high-level searching. A single integrated platform is essential to stay in line with our best practices.
What needs improvement?
The search could be slightly more intelligent. If I type in "Dell" and put an extra "L," Auvik doesn't give a suggestion, "Did you mean 'Dell?'" I have to fix that. That's a minor thing.
Also, if I select a specific device and apply it as a search filter, it shows me the device, and I have to click on it to see it at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, it just stays on the discovery. When I close the device, it remains on the switch displaying the diagram. I have to click the home dashboard to get back to the way it was.
When I remove the filter, it should take me back to the home dashboard. After I add a filter, select a device, and apply it as a search filter, I think it should pop up if there's only one. When there's only one device in the filter, I find it somewhat annoying to need to click it to dive into that device. If I remove the filter, I would prefer it return to the home dashboard. It's a minor irritation at times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used Auvik for more than five years, close to eight.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Auvik is solid. I have never experienced an outage. Auvik has downtime, but they provide notice well in advance. The maintenance window tends to be at times that won't impact me. The most recent maintenance window was on Dec. 3 at 7:00 AM Eastern, which is 4:00 AM Pacific, so it didn't affect me at all.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I don't see a limitation to the scalability.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before the company adopted Auvik, I used Visio to create my online diagrams by hand.
How was the initial setup?
I wasn't involved in the initial setup, but deploying the collectors is easy. Another person handles the onboarding process, but the network maps are populated within a day or so. I've never heard anyone say, "Hey, it's taking a long time for Auvik to get going." They say Auvik is up, and I see the map is there.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Auvik 10 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Dec 29, 2022
Flag as inappropriateDir. of I.S. at PHCA Administration, LLC
Provides real-time granular analysis, significantly reduces response time, and is easy to deploy
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the notification that alerts us to an offline server, whether the server is rebooting, resetting, or if we have network issues with the internet service provider."
- "The dashboard needs to be more intuitive."
What is our primary use case?
The solution helps us get a granular understanding of our environment, all the way down to the endpoints, to Azure, the networking, and all of the networking equipment, whether it's the access points, the firewall, or the switch. We can identify any latency or drops by keeping an eye on the network.
How has it helped my organization?
Auvik offers a single integrated platform for our organization simplifying our network monitoring.
Before Auvik we had to log into FortiGate followed by the internet service provider before we could log into Azure. We would then use an RMM for the endpoints, whether it was a Mac device or a Windows device.
Auvik has saved us approximately 20 hours per week of work that was previously completed by our support personnel.
Auvik allowed us to pinpoint root causes quicker, which saved us time investigating different environments. We can now focus on projects and progress further along. Additionally, we've been able to hold the ISP accountable.
Auvik helps us visualize the network mapping/topology for our organization which is required for our security audits regarding HIPPA.
It is pretty intuitive. I give the solution an eight out of ten for intuitiveness but the dashboard requires some getting used to.
The solution has affected our IT team's visibility into our remote and distributed networks by allowing us to pull up a single window pane and get a quick snapshot of all our locations, including our data center, which is in Azure.
Keeping the network up is critical for us. We have a voiceover IP phone solution that rides on this network, as well as our electronic medical records. Without visibility to help our IT teams focus on our network, we would have a lot of trouble finding needles in haystacks.
Auvik keeps our device inventories up to date. I ran a comparative analysis against our RMM and other RMMs, and then against our vulnerability assessment tool, and Auvik is spot on.
Its ability to keep our device inventories up to date has helped save us time. Deploying devices to users takes up a lot of our time. We have around 400 devices in use, and we have to replace broken devices often. Auvik saves us around five hours per week when it comes to documentation and keeping our inventory up to date.
Auvik helps our team focus on high-value tasks and delegate low-level tasks to junior staff by allowing us to focus on resolving network issues reported by end users and get a clear understanding of what's going on. This allows us to focus on our projects at hand.
We are able to identify issues on the server and address them quicker, rather than having to conduct an additional investigation and eliminate possibilities. We can identify issues within 15 minutes, as opposed to the two hours it used to take. On average, we now save 45 to 90 minutes per issue per day.
Auvik is a cloud-based solution, versus on-prem network monitoring solutions that require less maintenance. There is no on-prem server or license to worry about. The cloud solution is more convenient and efficient. We pride ourselves on being a leader in cloud adoption.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the notification that alerts us to an offline server, whether the server is rebooting, resetting, or if we have network issues with the internet service provider. We were running into problems trying to hold our ISP accountable because they were telling us it was not an issue on their end. We've done a lot of research and wasted man-hours investigating the Azure environment and the local network, which is set up as a hub and spoke-type configuration. Auvik has really given us granular information that we needed to address issues within the ISP environment.
The monitoring and management function of Auvik is fine once we get the hang of it.
The solution's ease of use for our operations is good once we adapt to the visual side.
Auvik does not require any maintenance.
What needs improvement?
The dashboard needs to be more intuitive.
I would like more training information on the dashboard and the different functionalities under the various modules.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for over one month.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution's stability is great and we have not had any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of the solution is good.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is great. I was out of town and missed a couple of the calls, and Auvik's tech support reached out to reschedule. We haven't had a problem with them whatsoever. The technical support team has been right on target.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Deploying the agent was easy and there were no issues. I oversaw the deployment with our IT director. I'm the director of IS, and familiar with how Auvik was set up. The probes were placed at each location to get the information we needed for our IT scheme.
We deployed the solution out of the box.
Auvik started to collect data in real time and map the network without any issues.
Compared to the numerous other agents we have deployed, whether it's 2R, JAM for Ninja, Addigy, or CyberCNS; Auvik is very easy. The most time-consuming piece is setting up the probe.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed in-house with a team of three people consisting of two system admins to set up the probes on the server, and a network admin for the network side.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated FortiGate, and we considered consolidating one of the RMMs that we're using. However, we required a solution that would allow us to remote into an end user's device to address the issue on the ticket. Auvik is a lot easier to use, and it costs less for us. Auvik also has more bells and whistles than the FortiGate solution.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution a ten out of ten.
We are a healthcare company with 16 locations, including our central billing office. We also have a data center in Azure that hosts 400 endpoints and around 300 users.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Senior Engineer at SMR Consulting
It has saved us significant time by bringing everything under one roof
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to map out the network topology is one of the top features I like about Auvik. It's one of the best on the market. They have a feature called Loopback Detection, which has helped us, in many scenarios easily detect that without having to physically go to the location to see if there is a loopback somewhere."
- "Although the network topology is excellent, it has a hard time picking up some devices on the network. A device might not be fully supported, or Auvik is unable to pull all the information from it."
What is our primary use case?
We use Auvik to manage our network, infrastructure, and servers across various locations. We don't use the automation portion of Auvik except for automated integration with our ticketing system. Auvik sends alerts, but we haven't set it up to resolve issues automatically.
How has it helped my organization?
In the past, we had to use the web UI or an SSH prompt to access a network switch and make modifications, but now we find that we can do that through Auvik. It saved us a significant amount of time by bringing everything under one roof. It's a big time saver to go to the Auvik website and make those changes. It's hard to quantify, but I would say it reduces the time needed by around 80 percent. We can respond to alerts and resolve them more quickly. I estimate that decreases our resolution time by about an hour per alert.
Auvik has also helped us manage our IT team. We have multiple people in the department, so it's also nice that Auvik creates a record of who checks the network equipment. I can find out precisely who checked and cleared an alert or who might have tunneled into a piece of equipment to make changes. The audit trail benefits us greatly.
We get alerts about any issue that's happening in the infrastructure. We're able to take those alerts. If it's a low-severity issue that can be fixed over time, we can assign it to a lower-level engineer. The critical alerts go to higher-tier engineers who can respond accordingly. The Auvik platform makes it very easy. Some alerts come in by default. Many of them are already pretty well-tuned to detect what's critical and what is just informational. We've built on their current alert system with a few modifications, but those alert systems allow us to prioritize who resolves the alerts. I don't think the device inventories save us time, but it's nice to see our count.
What is most valuable?
The ability to map out the network topology is one of the top features I like about Auvik. It's one of the best on the market. They have a feature called Loopback Detection, which has helped us, in many scenarios easily detect that without having to physically go to the location to see if there is a loopback somewhere.
The monitoring and management features are easy to use, and the documentation Auvik provides is clear and easy to understand. We set up a collector, and it's on its way. We have never had any trouble. It's great because even my junior engineers can set it up without a problem. Auvik offers a single integrated platform for managing our devices and infrastructure in one place. It isn't essential, but it's nice to have.
What needs improvement?
Although the network topology is excellent, it has a hard time picking up some devices on the network. A device might not be fully supported, or Auvik is unable to pull all the information from it.
The only other problem is the SNMP logging credentials. Sometimes, when I input these credentials, logging into the devices takes a decent amount of time to see if the credentials work. It would be fantastic if they could improve that.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Auvik for about three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Auvik is highly stable, and they communicate well about the maintenance windows. I don't think I've ever had Auvik go down in the middle of the day. It's very reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Auvik is extremely scalable. They have options for scaling to multiple sites. I don't know if there's even a theoretical limit to its scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I rate Auvik's support a ten out of ten. They're super knowledgeable. They typically have an answer for any question I throw at them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Auvik is very straightforward. We started with a trial, and from there, we could follow the guides to get everything set up. Our initial trial deployment was out-of-the-box, but once we purchased it, we reached out to Auvik to get it perfected.
Our deployment team consisted of me and one other person, so there were two people to deploy to every site. It was quick once everything was set up the way we wanted. It was a staged deployment, so it took longer than usual. If I were to do it right now, it probably wouldn't take longer than an eight-hour day.
What about the implementation team?
We deployed it ourselves with vendor support. We got everything set up and configured the way we wanted in an hour or so.
What was our ROI?
I don't know if time-to-value is necessarily a metric I would consider because it's mostly internal, but from a productivity standpoint, we can respond to IT issues faster. I don't see it in my organization, but I can totally see how companies that support multiple clients could see a time to value.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I believe that Auvik is one of the most expensive tools, but it is also the best.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We tested various solutions, but Auvik was our first choice. However, I wouldn't say we tried other solutions in the same depth as we used Auvik. It was three years ago, so I'm having difficulty remembering names. There was another solution that was part of the ticketing system we use. We tried that because it was built in, but it was subpar compared to Auvik.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Auvik a ten out of ten. If you plan to implement Auvik, you should deploy it in a testing environment to ensure it's running perfectly and customize the alerts that you want to get. With the out-of-the-box configuration, you will be getting alerts that you might not necessarily care about. If you take the time to go through those alerts and set everything up, it will probably make your life much easier.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Auvik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2023
Product Categories
Network Monitoring Software IT Infrastructure Monitoring Network Troubleshooting Cloud Monitoring Software Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)Popular Comparisons
PRTG Network Monitor
LogicMonitor
Meraki Dashboard
Liongard
SolarWinds NPM
Wireshark
Domotz
Zabbix
Fortinet FortiManager
Datadog
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
FortiMonitor
OmniPeek
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer
Azure Network Watcher
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Auvik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Network Performance Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
- What Questions Should I Ask Before Buying a Network Monitoring Tool?
- UIM OnPrem - SaaS
- Anyone switching from SolarWinds NPM? What is a good alternative and why?
- What is the best tool for SQL monitoring in a large enterprise?
- What tool do you recommend using for VoIP monitoring for a mid-sized enterprise?
- Should we choose Nagios or PRTG?
- Which is the best network monitoring tool: Zabbix or Solarwinds? Pros and Cons?
- What software solution would you recommend to monitor user machines?