Top 10 Amazon Elastic Load Balancing Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

22 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Amazon Elastic Load Balancing Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Amazon Elastic Load Balancing based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NetScaler, and HAProxy. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing surpasses its competitors by offering automatic traffic distribution across multiple targets, seamless integration with AWS services, and support for diverse load types, ensuring high availability and robust security for applications.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is recognized for cost-effectiveness and robust security features. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers seamless integration and scalability. Azure appeals through pricing, while Amazon attracts with advanced features and ROI for large-scale applications.

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway involves a high setup cost, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers a more economical setup cost. These differences in pricing can significantly influence initial budget considerations for implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

Citrix NetScaler offers flexible deployment and rich features, ideal for complex needs and Citrix integration. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing provides scalable, easy integration with AWS. NetScaler's high cost contrasts with Amazon's cost-effective model, appealing to budget-focused buyers.

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NetScaler Report

Pricing

NetScaler involves an upfront setup cost, whereas Amazon Elastic Load Balancing typically incurs lower initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler involves an upfront setup cost, whereas Amazon Elastic Load Balancing typically incurs lower initial expenses.

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy offers flexibility with extensive customization options, ideal for complex configurations. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing provides simplified cloud deployment with excellent customer support. HAProxy's cost-effectiveness appeals to self-sufficient users, while Amazon offers scalable cost predictability for cloud-focused teams.

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. HAProxy Report

Pricing

HAProxy offers a competitive setup cost with cost-effective open-source options, whereas Amazon Elastic Load Balancing involves a pay-as-you-go pricing structure that may lead to higher initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus

4.3 out of 5

NGINX Plus

4.3 out of 5

NGINX Plus excels in customization and performance, ideal for environments requiring tailored configurations. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Load Balancing integrates seamlessly with AWS, offering automatic scaling and traffic distribution. NGINX's pricing is based on features, whereas Elastic Load Balancing uses a pay-as-you-go model.

Download Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs. NGINX Plus Report

Pricing

NGINX Plus requires a setup cost, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing does not, highlighting a key cost difference between the two options.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus requires a setup cost, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing does not, highlighting a key cost difference between the two options.

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Network Management Applications