Fortinet FortiADC and Amazon Elastic Load Balancing are rivals in the load balancing category. Data indicates Amazon Elastic Load Balancing has a more robust feature set, giving it an edge for advanced capabilities and dynamic scaling.
Features: Fortinet FortiADC offers traffic management, application acceleration, and security integration. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing provides auto-scaling, AWS integration, and health checks.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiADC could enhance its scalability, ease of integration, and feature set for cloud environments. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing might improve cost predictability, support services, and offline functionality for hybrid setups.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Elastic Load Balancing supports easy AWS integration and simplified deployment, while Fortinet FortiADC benefits from robust customer service and versatile deployment options requiring more initial setup.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiADC offers competitive, predictable pricing with a high ROI for smaller scale environments. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing has variable costs and supports scalability, providing high ROI for enterprises with varying loads.
Elastic Load Balancing is a part of a total solution package.
Amazon Elastic Load Balancing requires minimal personnel for handling, which contributes to organizational value either in terms of cost savings or efficiency.
The alert system is efficient, sending alerts within a fraction of a second if any power issues arise.
The support team has architects available.
I would rate Amazon's technical support a nine out of ten.
The technical support is very responsive due to the prime-level support package.
The support team is knowledgeable and efficiently assists with automation and configuration problems.
On a scale from one to ten, the support deserves an eight.
The service is helpful yet not excellent.
It automatically scales up or down based on the quantity of requests, optimizing cost while efficiently managing varying workloads.
Managing traffic load is efficient as Auto Scaling Group can easily be connected with ALB based on the number of requests.
FortiGSLB cloud integrations provide maximum service availability and some flexible licensing options.
It is scalable for some versions, however, as components reach their end of support, upgrades are necessary to maintain scalability.
It is a stable and reliable service of AWS.
The support system is reliable when issues like automation or configuration arise.
Overall, it has been good; in the past it was very good, and now it is still performing well.
The ability to directly block specific IP addresses without additional service integration would be beneficial.
Improvements could involve making Amazon Elastic Load Balancing a global service, as currently, it is region-specific.
For example, in India, we have just two regions at the moment, which impacts latency.
Fortinet has been a pioneer for enterprise solutions, such as firewalls, SASE, ZTNA, and SD-WAN solutions, and they are in a leader quadrant.
If I need design help, they do not assist; they say it is a design issue they cannot support, and I must approach the system integrator.
The limitation of managing all components and the differing versions pose challenges.
Using ALB incurs a cost as opposed to the free open-source solutions like NGINX or HAProxy.
Pricing is okay, and Amazon has plans to reduce prices further.
This solution is quite expensive compared to Kemp.
The Application Load Balancer is noteworthy due to session persistence, traffic distribution, and integration with auto-scaling, which helps manage server scaling automatically based on demand.
Deploy our solution in multiple availability zones, it ensures that the system is always available and does not go down.
It is the de facto standard for AWS workloads and supports the AWS ecosystem seamlessly.
I use server load balancing and employ layer seven features, which provide more granular traffic shaping and detailed logs.
When integrated with FortiAnalyzer, it has much more significance.
FortiADC provides load-balancing capabilities needed for integration with other Fortinet platforms.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiADC | 9.8% |
| Amazon Elastic Load Balancing | 1.9% |
| Other | 88.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions. It can handle the varying load of your application traffic in a single Availability Zone or across multiple Availability Zones. Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers that all feature the high availability, automatic scaling, and robust security necessary to make your applications fault tolerant.
Fortinet FortiADC is a robust application delivery controller (ADC) that delivers application optimization, application security, and application availability. FortiADC is a valued offering from Fortinet, which is widely recognized as a trusted supplier of dynamic security solutions worldwide. FortiADC offers dynamic security functions (AV, DDoS, and WAF) in addition to advanced application connectors for a simplified deployment and complete transparency to an organization's networks and applications. FortiADC offers three primary deployment options: physical machine, virtual machine, (VM) and cloud solution options.
Fortinet FortiADC Benefits
Fortinet FortiADC Features
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
