Kemp LoadMaster Reviews

Name: Kemp LoadMaster
Brand: Progress Software
Rating: 4.7 (49 reviews)

4.7 out of 5

49 reviews
98% willing to recommend

848 followers

What is Kemp LoadMaster?

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Get the Kemp LoadMaster Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Kemp LoadMaster, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and more!

Kemp LoadMaster is the #9 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers. PeerSpot users give Kemp LoadMaster an average rating of 9.4 out of 10. Kemp LoadMaster is most commonly compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway: Kemp LoadMaster vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Kemp LoadMaster is popular among the midsize enterprise segment, accounting for 54% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a educational organization, accounting for 43% of all views.

Helped 856,874 peers since 2012

Featured Kemp LoadMaster reviews

PeterForster

Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

My company is really happy with Kemp LoadMaster as a product. My company is also happy with the support we receive from Kemp LoadMaster. I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement. Feature-wise, Kemp LoadMaster has everything that our company's customers require. Kemp LoadMaster also has features that have supported our company's past projects.

Read full review

Fareed Afser

Associate Engineer at AST

There are some challenges with updates on certain models that don't have a few features. The support team often takes a lot of time to provide resolutions for issues. Also, I could see more capabilities like DDoS mitigation and others available in other load balancers. Virtual chassis is another capability that should be added.

Read full review

AndreasKuhn

System Specialist at BT - British Telecom

They were still in the process of development, and for example, we set it up in a cluster. So it was one logistical unit built out of two physical devices. And the expected behavior, which I know from other devices, will be formed into a logic cluster. It's that you configure one unit. Then you bring the second unit into this cluster with the already configured primary unit. So the secondary box pulls all the configured ones from its neighbor, does everything automatically, and then synchronizes with this primary neighbor. And then it works, like, one logical unit. And this didn't work with the Kemp's initially, where they caused a lot of issues when building up a cluster, so there were some specials on how to set this up. When we built or set them up for the first time and the months afterward with no new software releases, there were a couple of problems, but in the end, they worked fine. So, they developed a lot and learned from what they've responded to, what we responded to them, and what needs fixing.

Read full review

Kemp LoadMaster mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 7.5%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Kemp LoadMaster reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)	Jun 15, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jun 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Kemp LoadMaster vs NetScaler	Jun 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Kemp LoadMaster vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	Jun 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Kemp LoadMaster vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway	Jun 15, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway	3.7	7.5%	79%	48 interviews Add to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	4.1	15.3%	83%	121 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

"Security is considered the most effective feature in Kemp LoadMaster."
"LoadMaster is easy to deploy and understand."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple."

Room for Improvement

Kemp LoadMaster requires improvements in user interface, reporting, and monitoring capabilities. The UI is viewed as outdated and complex to navigate. Documentation needs enhancement for clarity and ease. There are calls for better security features, including enhanced web application firewall support and password policies. Network management and log parsing capabilities require refinement. Automation, customization, and training options should be expanded. Reliability and stability require focus, along with more efficient license management. Integration with external templates and user-friendly logging tools is desired.

"There are some challenges with updates on certain models that don't have a few features."
"I want to have the ability to pull a particular server. The DevOps portion was challenging for me, like if I needed to redirect from one IP to another URL. I needed to look that up, and the knowledge base is not well organized. When I look for information about Kemp on the Internet, I don't find many articles or something like that."
"I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement."

ROI

Implementing Kemp LoadMaster enabled cost savings and enhanced security without compromising on essential features. Users reported high returns, often tripling investments. With a low expense compared to the benefits, Kemp LoadMaster reduced manual efforts and improved resource management. It offered immediate returns, providing stability and reassurance for server operations. Through improved security scores and extended projects, some users gained additional business opportunities. Longevity and frequent use led organizations to experience significant financial benefits.

Pricing

"The price of the solution is cheap."
"The price is lower than other options."
"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"

Popular Use Cases

Users deploy Kemp LoadMaster for primary tasks such as load balancing for Microsoft Exchange, web servers, Skype for Business, and Citrix solutions. It also serves as a reverse proxy, enhancing security with features like web application firewall and intrusion prevention. The device supports high availability and redundancy, accommodates both internal and external traffic, and seamlessly integrates into various environments, including on-premises and virtual machines. Multiple configurations and services like ADFS and RDS are efficiently managed.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Kemp LoadMaster Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

43%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

University

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Real Estate/Law Firm

Media Company

Legal Firm

Insurance Company

Construction Company

Non Profit

Healthcare Company

Hospitality Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Logistics Company

Transportation Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Compare Kemp LoadMaster with alternative products

Learn more about Kemp LoadMaster

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Kemp LoadMaster was previously known as LoadMaster Load Balancer.