NGINX Plus and Amazon Elastic Load Balancing compete in the application delivery and load balancing solutions sector. NGINX Plus seems to have the edge in modularity and customization, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is noted for its seamless cloud integration and scaling capabilities.
Features: NGINX Plus is recognized for its stability, modular design, and efficiency in resource usage. It offers robust load balancing, reverse proxy routing, and application delivery, with multi-thread compatibility being crucial for enterprise needs. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is praised for its scalability and integration with AWS services. It features sticky sessions, rule-based routing, and supports automatic traffic distribution across instances.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that NGINX Plus could improve scalability, ease of module management, and enhance its GUI and configuration process. Security and monitoring need further enhancement. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing could benefit from a faster setup, improved provisioning speed, and reduced latency. Enhanced reporting and technical support could benefit complex deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX Plus is appreciated for its versatile deployment options across various environments and robust community support. It provides reliable technical assistance when required. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is primarily deployed in public cloud environments, offering strong AWS ecosystem integration. However, some users have experienced delays in customer support, despite generally favorable service reviews.
Pricing and ROI: NGINX Plus offers tiered pricing based on features, potentially becoming costly for larger deployments. The open-source version remains a budget-friendly choice. Its ROI is notable in scenarios leveraging its advanced capabilities. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing uses a pay-as-you-go model, which is seen as cost-effective for scaling benefits. It offers competitive pricing in the cloud platform landscape, yielding solid ROI for managing internet-scale traffic.
Amazon Elastic Load Balancing requires minimal personnel for handling, which contributes to organizational value either in terms of cost savings or efficiency.
Elastic Load Balancing is a part of a total solution package.
The support team has architects available.
The technical support is very responsive due to the prime-level support package.
I would rate Amazon's technical support a nine out of ten.
Response time is good because they have assigned and dedicated support engineers to us, and we have weekly cadence calls.
It automatically scales up or down based on the quantity of requests, optimizing cost while efficiently managing varying workloads.
Managing traffic load is efficient as Auto Scaling Group can easily be connected with ALB based on the number of requests.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
It is a stable and reliable service of AWS.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
Improvements could involve making Amazon Elastic Load Balancing a global service, as currently, it is region-specific.
For example, in India, we have just two regions at the moment, which impacts latency.
The ability to directly block specific IP addresses without additional service integration would be beneficial.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
There were some vulnerabilities in F5.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
Using ALB incurs a cost as opposed to the free open-source solutions like NGINX or HAProxy.
Pricing is okay, and Amazon has plans to reduce prices further.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
The Application Load Balancer is noteworthy due to session persistence, traffic distribution, and integration with auto-scaling, which helps manage server scaling automatically based on demand.
It is the de facto standard for AWS workloads and supports the AWS ecosystem seamlessly.
Deploy our solution in multiple availability zones, it ensures that the system is always available and does not go down.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
The web application firewall feature has helped enhance security for our applications because most of the attacks which are performed on our website are being blocked by it.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon Elastic Load Balancing | 1.9% |
| NGINX Plus | 6.4% |
| Other | 91.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions. It can handle the varying load of your application traffic in a single Availability Zone or across multiple Availability Zones. Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers that all feature the high availability, automatic scaling, and robust security necessary to make your applications fault tolerant.
NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.
NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
