Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Reviews

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?

Featured F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 14.3%, down from 15.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)14.3%
NetScaler12.7%
Fortinet FortiADC9.7%
Other63.3%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Mar 10, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 10, 2026Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScalerMar 10, 2026Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs HAProxyMar 10, 2026Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Radware AlteonMar 10, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
NetScaler4.212.7%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.76.1%80%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 8, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise45
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business318
Midsize Enterprise152
Large Enterprise605
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Media Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) with alternative products

Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) customers

Related questions

 
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Network Engineer at Stryker5.0I use F5 BIG-IP LTM on-premises for HA load balancing with VIPs and pools across data centers and for SSL renewals. It’s stable, scalable, and the R-series improved performance and throughput. Support is good but case uploads/downloads could be faster; I rate it 10/10.
IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital4.0We use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager for managing traffic and securing data, benefiting from its ability to identify compromised traffic and enhance authentication. Although effective, it is costly, and we also use Fortinet alongside it without AI integration.
Project Manager at IBM4.5I've used F5 BIG-IP LTM for years to securely load balance applications across data centers, and it's been stable and effective, though pricey. Support could improve, but overall, I'm very satisfied with its performance and features.
Infrastructure Manager at Madfooat.com4.5I've used F5 BIG-IP LTM for 1.5 years and find its load balancing and WAF features excellent and stable, though the GUI feels outdated. Deployment was easy, and overall, it's a reliable on-premises solution I recommend.
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank4.5I work for a bank with a mobile app for 25,000 users, and we use F5 BIG-IP LTM for load balancing and security. Its attack signatures and automation are valuable, but cloud capabilities and solution integration need improvement compared to its on-prem service.
Information Security Consultant-Risk at a computer retailer with 11-50 employees4.5I used F5 BIG-IP LTM to segment and secure server traffic, appreciating its DOS, SQL injection, and bot protection. It improves efficiency with load-balancing algorithms, though customizable algorithms would enhance it. It outperformed Citrix and delivered excellent ROI.
General Manager at Seriti Resources4.5We deployed F5 BIG-IP LTM for two clients for load balancing. It's easy to deploy, stable, and offers unique features like templates for Office 365, though configuring takes time. Pricing could be more competitive compared to alternatives like Kemp.
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees3.5I used F5 BIG-IP LTM for backend load balancing. Its brand recognition and application delivery control are valuable, but the pricing model is frustratingly complex, leading me to consider other similar, cost-effective solutions that offer the same functionalities.