Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web?

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

Get the OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Functional Testing and more!
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is the #5 ranked solution in top Mobile App Testing Tools and #18 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Tricentis Tosca. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 42% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web mindshare

Product category:
Mobile App Testing Tools
As of December 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web in the Mobile App Testing Tools category stands at 4.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web4.9%
Tricentis Tosca29.5%
OpenText Functional Testing18.3%
Other47.3%
Mobile App Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryMobile App Testing ToolsDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Tricentis ToscaDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs OpenText Functional TestingDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs UiPath Test CloudDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.129.5%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.018.3%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 2, 2025

Valuable Features

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web enables simultaneous testing on real devices, supports emulators, and integrates with tools like ALM, UFT, and LeanFT. It offers robust automation, flexibility in deployment, strong traceability, and easy orchestration through its interface. Users appreciate features like device pool management, virtualization, AI-assisted script creation, and API integrations. Access to real-world network analytics and ease with both iOS and Android enhance its appeal in mobile testing.
  • "ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."
  • "The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."
  • "For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web requires easier setup and improved stability. Users suggest better server management, enhanced UI customization, and faster device detection. They seek more robust documentation, improved tool integrations, and multi-tenancy support. Integration with cloud services like AWS is desired, along with a more flexible pricing model. Object detection accuracy and performance need addressing. Collaboration with SAP and adopting low-code solutions may enhance strategic competitiveness.
  • "Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."
  • "OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."
  • "The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

Pricing

The pricing of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web involves initial affordability with potential increases after the first two years. While some users find costs average or slightly high, others note its competitiveness relative to alternatives. Additional costs include annual maintenance for perpetual licenses and possible implementation fees if using OEM or partner services. User ratings on pricing range from three to seven out of ten, indicating varying perceptions depending on specific needs and configurations.
  • "While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."
  • "The product could be more affordable."
  • "OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is utilized for automating mobile and desktop application testing, supporting platforms like SAP and Salesforce, and integrating with third-party tools such as BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. It facilitates automated functional and performance testing, optimizing software development life cycles. Used in financial services, system integration, and diverse application types, it supports CI/CD pipelines, regression testing, and UAT automation, ensuring readiness for software launches.

Service and Support

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web's customer support is described as excellent by many, though some find issues with entry-level representatives and documentation limited to the site. Users working with R&D report positive interactions. Support teams are noted as helpful with some users appreciating their responsiveness. Technical support is generally seen positively but not outstanding. Some users handle initial technical support and escalate to HPE when necessary. Delivery times for enhancements could be improved.

Deployment

Initial setup of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web varies in complexity. Some users find it straightforward and easy with the right knowledge and architecture, but others experience challenges, especially when integrating with other tools. Users note that Mobile Center requires technical skills and understanding due to Linux support, new approaches, and configuration complexities. While some report smooth deployment, others indicate it takes 1-2 months and multiple resources to complete.

Scalability

Scalability of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web varies among users. Some find it to be quite scalable with an excellent rating, especially in enterprise and medium-sized companies. Others mention limitations when scaling with decentralized devices. Satisfaction is noted due to features enabling connections through multiple devices and connectors. Users appreciate its capacity to accommodate various requirements, although some see potential challenges when expanding in certain conditions.

Stability

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web presents satisfactory stability for most users, but some report occasional quirks with managed devices that may require restarts. Internet issues can affect performance, with ratings varying from six to nine out of ten for stability. Updates have improved the platform significantly, and many users find it stable and reliable, particularly when implemented on local devices.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise66
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Non Profit
9%
Performing Arts
7%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Legal Firm
3%
University
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Government
2%
Insurance Company
1%
Security Firm
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Training & Coaching Company
1%

Compare OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?
  • Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
  • Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
  • Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
  • Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
  • Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
  • Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
  • Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
  • Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
  • Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web was previously known as Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Related questions

  • 9
What are the pros and cons of UFT Mobile vs Experitest as a mobile test automation solution?
  • 20
What is the difference between emulator and simulator in mobile testing?
  • 7
How do mobile app testing and web app testing differ, and what tools do you recommend for each?
  • 13
What tools do you recommend to use for mobile penetration testing in 2022?
  • 6
When evaluating Mobile App Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 9
What are the pros and cons of UFT Mobile vs Experitest as a mobile test automation solution?
  • 15
Why is Mobile App Testing Tools important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Mobile App Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
HeadSpin vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
HeadSpin vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
AWS Device Farm vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
AWS Device Farm vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
TestObject vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Logo
TestObject vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5I've found OpenText Functional Testing Lab versatile and stable, working well across platforms like SAP and Salesforce, with good CI/CD integration. However, low-code features and stronger SAP partnerships would enhance its competitiveness in an evolving market.
Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.5I've used OpenText testing tools for four years, appreciating their ease of use, zero cost, and realistic device testing. Though support could improve, features like AI scripting and API virtualization make them highly valuable for automation.
Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use OpenText UFT Digital Lab for automating mobile solutions in financial services. Its flexibility in device management is valuable, though interactions with OpenText support can be challenging. Overall, it enables efficient software testing across multiple platforms.
Technical director at Dugson.Consulting4.5I focus on helping customers optimize their software development lifecycle with OpenText UFT Digital Lab. Key features include automation and traceability across platforms like Jira and Azure DevOps. Improvements are needed in ensuring effective product usage and adoption of suitable frameworks.
Software Engineer at KPIT Technologies4.0I use OpenText UFT Digital Lab to test desktop applications. It offers valuable decision-making capabilities that contribute to its growth. However, it needs improvement in object detection to address performance issues. We chose it over SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.
Solutions Architect at MTN4.0I find OpenText UFT Digital Lab easy to use, though its pricing could be improved with a pay-per-use subscription model. I utilize Amazon Web Services for deployment. Overall, I appreciate its usability, but better pricing options would enhance value.
Sales Leader at Better Now4.0I find OpenText UFT Digital Lab easy to use, particularly for orchestrating mobile testing and automation. However, it needs improvement in scaling devices and integrating cloud solutions like AWS for enhanced functionality.
Responsible for Test Management at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available