AWS Device Farm vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.5% mindshare in MTT, compared to OpenText’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

593 Views
569 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 18 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

966 Views
493 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and AWS Device Farm are part of the testing space, both competing to offer comprehensive testing solutions. AWS Device Farm has an edge in features, whereas OpenText offers favorable pricing and strong customer support.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides robust test automation and integrates well with enterprise systems, suitable for organizations emphasizing enterprise integration. AWS Device Farm offers a wide array of real devices, extensive integration features, and supports various frameworks, making broad device coverage its key distinction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is known for straightforward deployment with a flexible architecture and attentive customer service facilitating seamless integration. AWS Device Farm, although rapid in deployment, is complemented by comprehensive documentation and community support. Both offer ease of deployment, but OpenText stands out in customer service, particularly for complex testing processes.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers competitive pricing with options benefiting large-scale enterprises through cost savings. AWS Device Farm’s pay-as-you-go model is versatile but can be costly for extensive testing needs. Despite AWS's potentially higher costs in intensive use cases, its feature set delivers satisfactory ROI. OpenText often proves more economical for enterprises focusing on specific integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.5%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 3.8%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	3.8%
AWS Device Farm	2.5%
Other	93.7%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Non Profit

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation. Additionally, from a strategic standp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web can be used for a range of applications, not just web and mobile. It works very well for SAP, which is an enterprise platform. It can be used for ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 52% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 11% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 11% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 11% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

September 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

September 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

September 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.