AWS Device Farm vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to OpenText’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

741 Views
242 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 17 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

500 Views
127 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and AWS Device Farm both compete in the software testing tools category, with each offering unique strengths. OpenText seems to hold the upper hand in integration and customization, while AWS provides superior device coverage and cloud accessibility.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers customizable automated testing, seamless integration with development frameworks, and flexibility across various platforms. AWS Device Farm specializes in real-device testing, provides extensive device availability, and comprehensive test reports. The primary difference lies in OpenText's strength in automation and integration compared to AWS's real-device versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText facilitates straightforward deployment through direct integration with existing software environments and provides comprehensive customer service. AWS Device Farm utilizes AWS infrastructure for easy cloud-based deployment and offers extensive support documentation. OpenText is noted for personalized service, while AWS offers scalability and comprehensive online support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides competitive initial setup costs with flexible pricing options, catering to enterprises with specific integration needs. AWS Device Farm operates with a pay-as-you-go model based on usage, leading to variable costs but promises strong ROI through its extensive testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

20%

Non Profit

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Device Farm?

I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Device Farm?

It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Device Farm?

We have used the solution for malware testing and APM.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 41% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 27% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 19% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 17% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 16% of the time

Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 14% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

June 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

May 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.