OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs TestObject comparison

OpenText and Sauce Labs are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Sauce Labs is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 5.6% mindshare in MTT, compared to Sauce Labs’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,471 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review

209 Views
207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

TestObject

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and TestObject compete in testing solutions for mobile and web applications. TestObject appears more favorable due to its feature-rich offerings and superior customer satisfaction metrics.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides comprehensive testing coverage, enhancing test automation and integration capabilities. TestObject is valued for its robust support for multiple device testing, ease of integration with CI/CD platforms, and flexible testing environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers a standardized deployment process with reliable customer service. TestObject features a streamlined deployment process, coupled with excellent service capabilities, leading to higher customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab presents an attractive pricing model with affordable setup costs, offering good ROI through cost efficiency. TestObject's ROI benefits are associated with its advanced features, which may involve higher initial costs but often provide improved testing capabilities and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

TestObject

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 5.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestObject is 2.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	5.6%
TestObject	2.3%
Other	92.1%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

RajeevSAwant

Head Automation CoE at Truglobal

Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation

This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features. It has integrated seamlessly with our framework and provides very wide coverage. It offers very comprehensive reporting and allows us to drill down to the various levels of the automation and respective application performance. What TestObject provides is not available from other service providers. The kind of detailed reporting provided is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

Cons

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs TestObject

Compared 66% of the time

Perfecto vs TestObject

Compared 18% of the time

More TestObject Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download TestObject product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

Sauce Labs

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

BW Bank, Telefonica

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.