Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Business Processing Testing Logo

OpenText Business Processing Testing Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5

What is OpenText Business Processing Testing?

Featured OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

OpenText Business Processing Testing mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Business Processing Testing0.8%
Tricentis Tosca12.0%
BrowserStack6.8%
Other80.4%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsMar 25, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis ToscaMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs BrowserStackMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonOpenText Business Processing Testing vs Worksoft CertifyMar 25, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.112.0%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.06.2%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Compare OpenText Business Processing Testing with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Business Processing Testing

OpenText Business Processing Testing customers

Related questions

 
OpenText Business Processing Testing Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies4.0No summary available
Testing Automation Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0No summary available
Test Automation Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I find BPT valuable as it enables business analysts to create quality test cases, improving maintainability and reducing technical dependency, though its run speed is slower and HP support could be better. Overall, it's best-in-class for DevOps.
Regional Infrastructure Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0I found this solution robust, enabling comprehensive, cross-platform test automation from web services to GUI, delivering significant ROI. Initial instability resolved quickly. Deployment and scalability were excellent, though local technical support was limited.
Test Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees3.0I value this solution's simplicity, integration, and ability to boost productivity through tester automation. However, test access in Quality Center is slow, components can't copy, and customer service is poor. I'd recommend it for long-term vision despite the price.
Test Automation Engineer with 51-200 employeesWe value its content reusability, ease of building tests, and reduced maintenance for a faster ROI. It's stable, deployed easily, and scalable, though test execution speed needs improvement.
Automation QA Specialist at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I value BPT for its modularity and fast test development, which separates automation from test design and enables manual testers to contribute. Setup was simple, unlike QTP. My main concern is execution speed.