OpenText Business Processing Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

350 Views
284 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,113 Views
2,148 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Processing Testing and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.2%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.7%
Other	96.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"The document understanding is good."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It represents good value for the investment."

"Its price is a bit high."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

January 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Test Suite

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.