OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Worksoft Certify comparison

OpenText and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while Worksoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,154 Views
992 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 89 Worksoft Certify reviews

7,676 Views
6,141 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Worksoft Certify compete in business process testing. Worksoft Certify has the upper hand due to its advanced features and functionalities despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers robust integration capabilities, automation features tailored for complex business scenarios, and re-usability of content. Worksoft Certify provides no-code automation, seamless integration with enterprise systems, and the ability to efficiently automate large-scale environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance usability for non-technical users, improve deployment efficiency, and expand its end-to-end automated testing functionalities. Worksoft Certify could benefit from reduced pricing, streamlined updates for smoother user experience, and more extensive documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify offers a simplified deployment process and dedicated support teams ensuring smoother transitions and integration. OpenText has a more intricate deployment process but provides strong customer guidance and service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing presents a competitive setup cost with scalable solutions providing substantial ROI. Worksoft Certify requires a higher initial investment but offers advanced features and quicker benefit realization, making it appealing for enterprises seeking long-term ROI gains.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.0%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.0%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.9%
Other	96.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"Automating the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) process is the most valuable feature of this tool which helps us save loads of time for our clients on the projects and also generating testing and other reports."

"A significant positive impact is that Worksoft Certify requires no coding skills, unlike most other automation tools, as it is a codeless tool that anyone can easily learn and use for automation while also offering CTM to schedule suites and BPP to generate reports so we can develop end-to-end scripts, perform API testing, and conduct web automation across 29 supported interfaces including SAP GUI, S/4HANA, MS Office, Notepad, and PDF automation."

"It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well."

"It is a fantastic tool."

"We have cut maintenance testing time by 30 to 35 percent."

"With Worksoft, we have been able to automate six of our smoke tests in four months."

"Provides all the in-built functionalities and is a wonderful tool."

"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"Better automation capability would be helpful."

"Rather than the product, I would first say from my experience that the immediate availability of a person or the support team is needed for anyone who requires help in areas wherever it is required."

"Right now, Capture 2.0 doesn't really work for our Business Analysts."

"Worksoft Certify's tech support's response time could be improved."

"Upgrading Certify takes a lot of time and effort, which is like a small project by itself."

"The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues."

"Technical support's first response to us is usually late."

"What could be improved in Worksoft Certify is its integration with other tools, for example, test management tools such as Jira, ALM, or any other test management tools. That integration is missing."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"Worksoft Certify is slightly more expensive compared to other automation tools that are available on the market. However, the majority of the clients who are utilizing this solution, don't care much about the price. The main aspect the clients look for is its stability and reliability on the automation and whether they are able to rely on the automation scripts."

"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."

"Worksoft Capture 2.0 can help our customers to accelerate their automation development at least 40 percent faster than any other commercial tools available in the market."

"Worksoft Certify is priced higher than most tools."

"Worksoft has paid for itself fives times over."

"We save probably 50 percent of our time. The tool does what it's supposed to do, and we are able to actually work."

"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

18%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Energy/Utilities Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I am not certain about the pricing of Worksoft Certify. What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

Based on my experience working in Worksoft Certify and this web application, there are several things that do not work as expected in Worksoft.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 17% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 6% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

July 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.