We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Processing Testing and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The product must provide more automation."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"Its UI could be better."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with , whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
