OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Testim comparison

OpenText and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

350 Views
284 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,827 Views
1,555 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Testim compete in software testing. Testim seems to have the upper hand with its innovative features and agile support that justify its pricing.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides robust automation for business process scenarios, precise analytics for enterprise needs, and allows both technical and non-technical staff to contribute effectively. Testim offers AI-powered automation, agile testing capabilities, and straightforward setup suitable for dynamic environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user experience with less complex configurations, more intuitive interfaces, and speedier deployment processes. Testim can improve by reducing initial costs, offering more detailed analytics, and expanding cross-technology support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText requires extensive setup, tailored for enterprises with dedicated IT teams. Testim simplifies deployment, allowing faster integration with agile support closely aligned with ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText may be more cost-effective for large operations due to lower initial costs. Testim's higher initial costs are justified by innovative features and enhanced productivity, leading to expected gains in ROI through faster market delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Testim	3.0%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.7%
Other	96.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The product is easy to use."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 27% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 17% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 12% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

January 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

January 2026

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.