Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Testim comparison

OpenText and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #40, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 0.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.
OpenText Business Processin...
Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews
  • 132 Views
  • 37 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Testim
Read 10 Testim reviews
  • 1,581 Views
  • 995 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Testim compete in software testing. Testim seems to have the upper hand with its innovative features and agile support that justify its pricing.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides robust automation for business process scenarios, precise analytics for enterprise needs, and allows both technical and non-technical staff to contribute effectively. Testim offers AI-powered automation, agile testing capabilities, and straightforward setup suitable for dynamic environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user experience with less complex configurations, more intuitive interfaces, and speedier deployment processes. Testim can improve by reducing initial costs, offering more detailed analytics, and expanding cross-technology support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText requires extensive setup, tailored for enterprises with dedicated IT teams. Testim simplifies deployment, allowing faster integration with agile support closely aligned with ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText may be more cost-effective for large operations due to lower initial costs. Testim's higher initial costs are justified by innovative features and enhanced productivity, leading to expected gains in ROI through faster market delivery.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Testim
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
11th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RR
Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases
There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.
Read full review
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."
"The product is easy to use."
"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."
"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."
"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."
"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."
"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."
"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."
More Testim pros
 

Cons

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."
"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."
"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."
"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."
"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."
"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."
"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."
"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."
More Testim cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is not expensive."
"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Educational Organization
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Testim?
More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim
Compared 45% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Testim Logo
Katalon Studio vs Testim
Compared 21% of the time
Functionize vs Testim Logo
Functionize vs Testim
Compared 14% of the time
Testsigma vs Testim Logo
Testsigma vs Testim
Compared 7% of the time
Applitools vs Testim Logo
Applitools vs Testim
Compared 4% of the time
More Testim Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Processing Testing
June 2025
OpenText Business Processing Testing reportDownload OpenText Business Processing Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Testim
May 2025
Testim reportDownload Testim product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim
 

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim
June 2025
Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Testim report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.