OpenText Business Processing Testing vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText Silk Test are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked #37, while OpenText Silk Test is ranked #22. OpenText Business Processing Testing holds a 1.0% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText Silk Test’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText Business Processing Testing users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText Silk Test users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,458 Views
1,239 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,642 Views
2,804 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and OpenText Business Processing Testing are products in the test automation sector. OpenText Business Processing Testing often holds the upper hand due to its robust features and enhanced capabilities.

Features: OpenText Silk Test is notable for its automation of web, mobile, and enterprise applications with strong cross-platform support, flexible script sharing, and a powerful object model for windows declarations. OpenText Business Processing Testing emphasizes process-driven testing, advanced modular testing capabilities, and allows nontechnical testers to partake in automation processes.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve the speed of application script modifications, enhance browser recognition for newer technologies, and simplify the integration with cloud-based services. OpenText Business Processing Testing may benefit from reducing its learning curve, enhancing integration with non-OpenText systems, and expanding its process integration capability to handle more diverse business environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test provides a user-friendly setup with comprehensive documentation and immediate support. In contrast, OpenText Business Processing Testing, with its complex setup, requires a thorough onboarding process, but it comes with commendable customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is affordable with a swift ROI appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In contrast, OpenText Business Processing Testing, despite higher initial costs, promises high long-term ROI through improved efficiencies and reduced operational errors.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (13th), Test Automation Tools (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Silk Test	2.1%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	1.0%
Other	96.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is user-friendly with respect to automation."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

"The Silk4J feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

Cons

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"At that time, we never had good technical support in Bangalore."

"SilkTest has to improve on Firefox and Chrome as their versions change."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"Implementing a better integration with Git. It was extremely painful to implement the link from Silk Central to Git."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

September 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Silk Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.