| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 12.1% |
| Aruba Wireless | 16.0% |
| Ruckus Wireless | 14.1% |
| Other | 57.8% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Wireless LAN | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless | Aug 28, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aruba Wireless | 4.2 | 16.0% | 86% | 149 interviewsAdd to research |
| Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points | 4.4 | 5.6% | 100% | 23 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 750 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 415 |
| Large Enterprise | 1229 |
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was previously known as MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk | 4.0 | I primarily use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for enterprise and guest Wi-Fi, especially in the retail sector. Its cloud-based management offers streamlined control of wireless devices and security clients, though improving uplink limitations could enhance competitiveness and user experience. |
| Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | In our nonprofit organization, we upgraded from outdated Cisco access points to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, appreciating the centralized control and ability to manage all access points from one dashboard. Recent improvements include new wireless protocols and stronger antennas, enhancing performance. |
| Solution Architect at airtel | 4.5 | I use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for office infrastructure and IoT, finding it intuitive and offering excellent control and visibility. However, it's best for small to medium businesses, as it struggles with scalability for larger enterprises. |
| Consultant at Markit Spain | 3.5 | In reviewing Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, I find that while it excels in cloud solutions and open APIs, it needs improvements in multi-tenant speed and graphics. Although Cisco surpasses Aruba in bandwidth efficiency, Ruckus leads in radio signaling. |
| Strategie, Innovazione e Customer Experience – Analytics & Customer Experience (CEX) Manager at Telecom Italia | 4.0 | I find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN valuable for its centralized security management, simplifying network security. However, the management tools require improvement. There are no specific deployment details or consideration of other solutions mentioned in the review. |
| Network Engineer at TechProc | 4.0 | Our hotel resort relies on Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for reliable internet access across 120 rooms, with around 90 devices deployed. The service enhances mobility and speed, but pricing competitiveness could improve. We compared it to Aruba for better cost insights. |
| Chief Technologies Officer at ASTORG PARTNERS | 4.0 | I've used Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for five years and find its cloud-managed, plug-and-play setup very convenient. It's stable, scalable, easy to configure, and integrates well across locations, though occasional update issues arise. |
| Sr Systems Engineer Network at AutoZone | 4.0 | I use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to provide seamless connectivity for our ten office users, leveraging six APs for reliable speeds and coverage. The solution is beneficial but requires improved visibility and stability due to bugs affecting performance. |
