AWS CodeBuild Reviews

Name: AWS CodeBuild
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.1 (11 reviews)

4.1 out of 5

11 reviews
90% willing to recommend

What is AWS CodeBuild?

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Get the AWS CodeBuild Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild, GitLab, Jenkins and more!

AWS CodeBuild is the #9 ranked solution in top Build Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeBuild an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. AWS CodeBuild is most commonly compared to GitLab: AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab. AWS CodeBuild is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 21% of all views.

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured AWS CodeBuild reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

The product must provide more integrations. It is a replica of Jenkins. We have a management overhead. When I build artifacts stored outside the S3 bucket, it will have additional charges on the storage volumes. If we use S3 buckets regularly, it is fine. However, when we store somewhere else, it will be an issue. There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds. We must fix the dependencies every time, even if the dependencies are the same. It is unnecessary.

Read full review

Stepan Raichl

AWS Competency Lead at trask

We have it on various client projects and we rarely use it individually. It forms part of an entire pipeline committed in CodeCommit along with all the customers' code. Then, it's picked up by CodeBuild in the pipeline to build the site, update the sites, and update the services with CloudFormation…

Read full review

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors. It's crucial to have accurate environment configurations to avoid such problems. During the build stage, we often face time issues that cause delays, which can be troublesome.

Read full review

AWS CodeBuild mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild in the Build Automation category stands at 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AWS CodeBuild reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Build Automation	May 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs Tekton	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins	May 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.3	15.9%	97%	82 interviews Add to research
Jenkins	4.0	10.4%	87%	93 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

AWS CodeBuild's integration with AWS services, X-Ray, CloudWatch, and third-party tools like GitLab and Jenkins is highly valued. Its serverless nature offers elasticity and reliability. Users appreciate the seamless debugging, logging, and support for third-party repositories. The system simplifies managing roles and permissions and automatically scales. It allows variable definitions for multiple stages, enhancing the build pipeline. Each user manages identities and enjoys AWS's focus on security and availability.

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."
"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."
"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

Room for Improvement

AWS CodeBuild requires improvement in its integrations, particularly with Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy. Users face challenges due to limited instance-type options and lack of persistent storage between builds. Notifications are absent, adding to the management’s difficulty. The interface struggles compared to GitHub or GitLab. Users experience issues with environment setups and looping functionality, causing delays. Costs increase when storing artifacts outside S3. Expanding integration support and enhancing user experience are necessary.

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."
"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."
"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

Pricing

AWS CodeBuild pricing is generally perceived as reasonable for enterprises. Users highlight paying only for compute resources during builds, with no dedicated infrastructure costs. Initial expenses are offset by features like caching, which optimize costs. Services like CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are included without extra fees due to their serverless nature. AWS services may be pricier compared to free open-source tools, but CodeBuild as part of a service bundle is considered affordable.

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."
"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."
"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use AWS CodeBuild for continuous integration and building pipelines. It aids in constructing Docker images for containerized applications, compiling application binaries, and building microservice-based applications. CodeBuild integrates with CodeCommit to update sites and services using CloudFormation scripts. Teams rely on it for automated tasks like setting environment variables and deploying applications on EKS. It often forms part of a broader pipeline system for comprehensive CI/CD processes.

Service and Support

AWS CodeBuild's service and support receive positive feedback. Users appreciate responsive and efficient service, especially those with Enterprise accounts, often rating it eight to ten out of ten. They mention quicker responses compared to similar services, though some experience delays regardless of subscription tier. Many emphasize satisfaction with team effectiveness, particularly in addressing technical issues and stabilizing services, even highlighting successful assistance with integration tasks. Azure is often mentioned as having slower support for lower-tier accounts.

Deployment

Users find AWS CodeBuild's initial setup has a learning curve but is more comfortable than Jenkins, though less easy than open-source alternatives. Some encounter errors during first-time configuration but find setup straightforward with no installation needed. AWS CodeBuild works in a CICD suite with CodeCommit, CodeDeploy, and CodePipeline. Experience varies; some find setup easy, others find it lengthy or complex during deployment configuration. AWS knowledge is beneficial but not mandatory.

Scalability

AWS CodeBuild demonstrates effective scalability, enabling dynamic scaling and automatic adjustments to application needs. With flexible multi-pipeline support, it manages different workflows for diverse user groups ranging from dozens to over a hundred. The service efficiently accommodates various client requirements, providing satisfactory storage and build initiation. However, there are occasional CPU allocation limitations compared to other platforms. Despite these, users appreciate the seamless integration and ease of managing applications across multiple providers.

Stability

AWS CodeBuild exhibits high stability with minimal crashes compared to alternatives like Jenkins. Users rarely experience downtime, with stable performance once setup is complete. Occasional issues may arise, such as Java compatibility or resource limitations, which are manageable with manual intervention. Users consistently report no storage-related problems, and builds trigger reliably when configuring environments. While most rate AWS CodeBuild highly, some note occasional bugs and complexities during the setup phase.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AWS CodeBuild Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.