AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins comparison

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,539 Views
3,468 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and AWS CodeBuild are prominent players in the CI/CD space. While Jenkins offers extensive customization and flexibility through its open-source nature, AWS CodeBuild gains an edge with seamless AWS service integration and effortless scalability.

Features: Jenkins provides a robust ecosystem with extensive plugin support, including Jenkins Pipelines, which allows for high pipeline customization, and programmable pipelines for process automation. AWS CodeBuild offers native integration with AWS services, serverless architecture that enhances elasticity and reliability, and seamless integration with third-party tools such as GitHub, facilitating ease of use within AWS environments.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could enhance its installation process across different platforms, address plugin management issues, and update its interface for a better user experience. AWS CodeBuild may improve by strengthening integration with external storage solutions, enhancing loop functionality within scripts, and developing a more intuitive user interface along with improved build notification features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployments, but lacks formal customer service, relying on community support. AWS CodeBuild focuses on managed public cloud deployment, reducing infrastructure concerns for AWS users and offering AWS support that minimizes the need for community reliance.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is an open-source tool with no license fees, making it highly cost-effective for organizations seeking community support. AWS CodeBuild's pay-as-you-go pricing based on compute resources provides financial flexibility, though it may be more expensive than Jenkins. Jenkins could lead to substantial cost savings in large deployments, while AWS CodeBuild offers competitive pricing and reasonable ROI, especially for projects already integrated into AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: September 2025).

AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 9.1%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jenkins	9.1%
AWS CodeBuild	1.7%
Other	89.2%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

Integration with diverse environments boosts productivity and automation

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

Annamalai Pts

DevOps Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

Streamlined CI/CD pipelines with powerful integration and an easy setup

I use Jenkins as a CI/CD tool. We create pipelines using Jenkins, with stages for Maven builds, Docker image builds, SonarQube integration, and deploying the image to a Kubernetes cluster, AWS EKS Jenkins has made the developers' work very easy. They commit to the remote repository, and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

"The solution provides good integrations."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are creating builds, and connecting them with Sonar for Sonar analysis. Additionally, we connect it with other vulnerability tools, such as WhiteSource which is useful."

"Jenkins is particularly valuable since it saves time by automating manual tasks."

"I like the business logs. It's a very useful tool. Client-server communication is also very fast."

"The deployment of traditional Jenkins is easy."

"Continuous Integration. Jenkins can integrate with almost any systems used for application development and testing, with its plugins."

"Jenkins allows us to automate deployment, so I no longer have to do it manually. That's the primary use case. The other advantage of Jenkins is that it's open source. It was free for me to download and install. It's a product that's been in use for many years, so I can find a lot of support online for any issues that I may encounter while configuring anything for a given use case."

"The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle."

"This solution has helped us in automating the build and test process, reducing time."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"The onboarding of Jenkins should be smoother, and it should have more pipelines available as it's deployed on many different servers."

"Improvement-wise, I would want the solution's user interface to be changed for the better. In short, the solution can be made more user-friendly."

"I do not have any notes for improvement."

"We need more licensed product integrations."

"The user interface could be improved, and its reporting capabilities need enhancement. The plugins could be more effective."

"Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly."

"Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial."

"There are some difficulties when we need to execute the DB script."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"The solution is open source."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

"Jenkins is a free open-source server."

"This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"It is free."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"Some of the add-ons are too expensive."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and exten...

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Comparisons

Compared 41% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 25% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 19% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

JFrog Pipeline vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeBuild

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Download Jenkins product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins