AWS CodeBuild vs GoCD comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Thoughtworks are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Thoughtworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Thoughtworks’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Thoughtworks users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 12 AWS CodeBuild reviews

548 Views
548 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

881 Views
617 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

GoCD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GoCD and AWS CodeBuild are both CI/CD products. AWS CodeBuild has certain advantages due to its native integration capabilities within the AWS ecosystem, robust support, and typically provides a better return on investment for those already using AWS services extensively.

Features: GoCD focuses on customization, advanced pipeline modeling, and complex workflow management with its pipeline configurations. AWS CodeBuild offers native integration with the AWS ecosystem, automated scaling, and extensive third-party integration support.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could improve by expanding its plugin ecosystem and enhancing community support for non-standard configurations. Additionally, simplifying its user interface could make it more approachable for new users. AWS CodeBuild could benefit from better insights into cost metrics, improved local testing tools, and perhaps extended support for non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD's on-premise deployment supports organizations that need tight infrastructure control and it relies largely on community support. AWS CodeBuild offers managed service with cloud deployment, benefitting from AWS's solid customer support options, which help streamline deployment and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD's open-source nature makes it cost-effective with lower upfront expenses. AWS CodeBuild's pay-as-you-go model suits scalable needs, offering significant ROI particularly for those already invested in AWS infrastructure, despite potential higher costs as scale increases.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (15th), Release Automation (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoCD is 1.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

Integration with diverse environments boosts productivity and automation

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at Cognizant

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The integration is a good feature."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"The UI is colorful."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

Cons

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and exten...

See all answers

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 37% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 23% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 22% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 28% of the time

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 27% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 18% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

August 2025

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

August 2025

Download GoCD product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD

July 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.