AWS CodeBuild vs GoCD comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
786 views|725 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Thoughtworks Logo
1,141 views|897 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and GoCD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution provides good integrations.""The integration is a good feature.""It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).""The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow.""The integration is a good feature."

More AWS CodeBuild Pros →

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member.""The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive.""The UI is colorful."

More GoCD Pros →

Cons
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected.""There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds.""The deployment fails sometimes.""They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

More AWS CodeBuild Cons →

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us.""The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases.""The tool must be more user-friendly."

More GoCD Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay a monthly licensing fee."
  • "Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."
  • More AWS CodeBuild Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an open-source and free tool."
  • "This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."
  • More GoCD Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).
    Top Answer:Using AWS CodeBuild might involve some initial expenses, but there are strategies to optimize costs and ensure a return on investment. Leveraging features like caching files and using the artifact… more »
    Top Answer:While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected. Although conditions were… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins is overtaking the product. The product must enhance user experience. Jenkins has everything in a simple XML format. However, GoCD is complex. Upgrading it to a simpler language would be… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    786
    Comparisons
    725
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    8.8
    10th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,141
    Comparisons
    897
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    575
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    CodeBuild
    Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

    GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Insurance Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer11%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while GoCD is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 6 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while GoCD is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, GitHub Actions and Jenkins. See our AWS CodeBuild vs. GoCD report.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.