Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AutoSys Workload Automation Logo

AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.2 out of 5

What is AutoSys Workload Automation?

Featured AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

AutoSys Workload Automation mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation in the Workload Automation category stands at 7.7%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AutoSys Workload Automation7.7%
Control-M13.8%
Redwood RunMyJobs7.0%
Other71.5%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationMar 19, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-MMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic AutomationMar 19, 2026Download
ComparisonAutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMSMar 19, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.413.8%98%191 interviewsAdd to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4.04.8%92%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise63
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business223
Midsize Enterprise115
Large Enterprise1053
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
41%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Government
3%
Performing Arts
3%
University
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Non Profit
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare AutoSys Workload Automation with alternative products

Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation

AutoSys Workload Automation customers

Related questions

 
AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I find AutoSys Workload Automation stable, scalable, and easy to use for infrastructure tasks, but it needs better cloud integration and web UI improvements. Pricing changes post-acquisition are concerning, prompting us to explore alternative scheduling tools.
Program Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I worked with AutoSys Workload Automation, valuing its scalability and reliability despite its limited integration compared to Control-M. While it excels in managing large job volumes, its cost can be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
Technical Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5No summary available
Technical Lead at Natwest4.0AutoSys Workload Automation helps centralize our bank's non-mainframe processes and is valued for its performance, scalability, and user-friendliness. However, the UI is outdated, and manual tasks and tool integration could be improved. It delivers high ROI by reducing manual efforts.
Application Developer / Freelancer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.0I use AutoSys to manage thousands of scheduled jobs, benefiting from its reusable configurations, user-friendly UI, and security features. While it reduces manual workload and offers ROI through resource savings, improvements in monitoring and APIs are needed.
Architect & Technical Director at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees4.0I've used AutoSys Workload Automation for nearly 20 years; it's easy to use, scalable, and simplifies job scheduling, though the UI could improve. It integrates well with events and offers solid monitoring, reporting, and documentation.
Manager at Capgemini4.0No summary available
Technical Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5No summary available