AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews

Name: AutoSys Workload Automation
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 4.2 (82 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

82 reviews
94% willing to recommend

What is AutoSys Workload Automation?

AutoSys Workload Automation efficiently manages complex workloads across platforms, offering high availability and seamless platform integration. Its reliability and scalability are valued for enterprise-level automation, enhancing job management and reducing manual effort with robust scheduling and advanced security.

Get the AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation, Control-M, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and more!

AutoSys Workload Automation is the #7 ranked solution in top Workload Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give AutoSys Workload Automation an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. AutoSys Workload Automation is most commonly compared to Control-M: AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M. AutoSys Workload Automation is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 81% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 46% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

August 2025

Get the report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Featured AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Muralidhar Burla

Manager at Capgemini

The reporting system, currently, could be better. In the reporting system, currently, if you want to see or generate the job dependency, you can have a flowchart right now that shows job flows. We can see from the job flow in that graphic representation, however, I would like to see them work more on that, maybe, to make it better and more robust. We'd like more details about the job success versus failure. Right now, we just get statistics. We'd like something that generates job names along with the accounting. There also needs to be more customized reporting. It would help a lot. The solution could use more monitoring.

Read full review

reviewer2723997

Program Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

AutoSys Workload Automation is not currently enabled in the AWS marketplace. I have not checked it as I recently came back to workload automation product solutions. It is all about the strategy you take for any tool. If you own a tool, you have a market. You have to consider how you want to penetrate it and how existing customers are moving. Most AutoSys Workload Automation customers are moving because of cost; it is more cost intrusive. It is cost-agnostic because of its robustness and scalability, as no other tools can offer such robust and scalable solutions. However, it comes with a cost, and its licensing model is also a little costlier compared to customers' requirements. If you are running a smaller organization, you do not need advanced features. It all depends on the customer requirements. I am a service provider or IT service organization member delivering services to multiple customers using batch tools, workload automation, or service-oriented architecture platform tools. For example, if I go to a small ERP vendor in the UK, they only look for an affordable tool. If I offer AutoSys Workload Automation, it is too costly for them to manage, and they cannot utilize all the capabilities. I know Control-M is very agile and iterative. If a small customer has a requirement, they can pick it up easily, and they have strong development and sales teams to add on to their existing product solutions and what we call solution enablers and epics. Any product contains two things: market enablers and epics. If I need to add an AI agent, something specific, I can just deploy that agent. The ability to add solutions depends significantly on individual customer needs, and Control-M adapts well to requirements from existing solutions. However, Control-M has its limitations; for instance, if I want to run a million jobs, it may break, while AutoSys Workload Automation is much more reliable and has defined system break-even points. I have not physically compared Control-M and AutoSys Workload Automation in a lab, but I can say AutoSys Workload Automation is more scalable and durable compared to Control-M.

Read full review

AutoSys Workload Automation mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation in the Workload Automation category stands at 10.5%, down from 17.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Workload Automation	Aug 17, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Aug 17, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M	Aug 17, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation	Aug 17, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs	Aug 17, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Control-M	4.3	19.9%	98%	125 interviews Add to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	4.0	5.9%	92%	59 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

AutoSys Workload Automation's most valuable aspects are its robust scheduling features, high scalability for managing extensive job volumes, and multi-platform integration. Its user-friendly interface, enhanced security, and stability support diverse business needs. The system's ability to automate processes reduces manual tasks and offers predictive analytics. Security configurations allow precise access control, while its capability to run complex workloads efficiently is highly prized. Enterprises benefit from quick job execution and flexible automation options.

"The benefits I have seen from AutoSys Workload Automation are significant; I would say it is about ease of administration."
"AutoSys significantly reduces manual effort."
"Autosys is one of the oldest products in the market, and it has been around for quite a long time, close to 20 to 25 years."

Room for Improvement

AutoSys Workload Automation requires enhanced scheduling capabilities and a modernized GUI. A unified interface is needed while improving support and integration with cloud platforms. Improving monitoring, analytics, and reporting features would be beneficial. Users desire straightforward migration paths, better scalability, and reduced licensing costs. Enhanced automation features, comprehensive documentation, and seamless integration with other platforms or tools are also sought after. Advanced workflow features and a more intuitive user experience are important for users.

"Most AutoSys Workload Automation customers are moving because of cost; it is more cost intrusive."
"The scalability is poor because I cannot use it for all automation solutions."
"Autosys is still lagging behind some competitive products from a functionality perspective."

ROI

AutoSys Workload Automation provided a positive return on investment. Users have expressed satisfaction with the software's ability to efficiently manage and automate workloads, resulting in improved productivity and cost savings.

The solution was praised for its user-friendly interface, robust features, and reliable performance, leading to enhanced efficiency and streamlined processes.

Pricing

AutoSys Workload Automation pricing is variable, often seen as costly, with licensing based on agents, jobs, and distributed operations. Some users find the yearly license reasonable, while others express dissatisfaction with CA's pricing model. The setup may involve initial fees and annual maintenance costs. Evaluators should consider specific enterprise requirements and growth potential, as flexibility in licensing can influence value perceptions. Some experience improved efficiency despite higher costs compared to alternatives.

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."
"We paid to use the solution monthly."
"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

Popular Use Cases

AutoSys Workload Automation is used for job scheduling and batch processing across diverse platforms. Companies integrate it with Zeke mainframe scheduler, manage financial transactions, SAP job submissions, and file transfers. It supports tasks like ETL processing, automated triggers, and enterprise-wide scheduling, enabling cross-application and platform dependencies. Organizations use it for banking, insurance, and retail workloads, ensuring reliable execution and timely monitoring through alerts. Performance and stability are consistently appreciated across various business sectors.

Service and Support

AutoSys Workload Automation's customer service and support generally receive positive feedback for responsiveness and knowledge. Users often praise the helpful and timely assistance, though there are occasional concerns about declining quality after the Broadcom acquisition. Many users rate their experience highly, citing quick issue resolution and knowledgeable staff. Some mention the need for improved initial contact, while others find the existing support satisfactory, leveraging knowledge bases and experienced teams for additional assistance when necessary.

Deployment

Some participants found AutoSys Workload Automation's initial setup straightforward and user-friendly, appreciating its quick and easy installation. Others reported complexities, especially during upgrades or migrations, due to security settings and legacy systems. The process required careful planning, particularly for high-availability setups. Several organizations relied on vendor support to ease complexities, and specialists played a significant role in smoothing transitions. Experiences varied depending on system requirements and prior exposure to similar tools.

Scalability

AutoSys Workload Automation demonstrates robust scalability, impressively managing large job volumes daily for numerous users across diverse environments. Organizations report seamless growth capabilities, handling extensive deployments without encountering significant scaling challenges. The architecture supports integration with multiple systems, accommodating transitioning operating systems and emphasizing easy server expansion. Users describe it as efficient, handling increased demands effectively, even foreseeing potential for significant growth. The scalability aspect receives high praise, making it desirable for enterprise-level operations.

Stability

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely recognized as stable and reliable. Users report that it consistently operates without interruption, boasting high availability and robust performance. While infrastructure-related issues occasionally arise, the application itself rarely experiences significant problems. Many appreciate its ability to maintain operations during failovers and maintenance. The software is described as dynamic, easily adapting to changes and running smoothly. Numerous users rate its stability very high, emphasizing its dependable and consistent performance.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

46%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Government

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Performing Arts

Media Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Consumer Goods Company

Outsourcing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Construction Company

Legal Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Hospitality Company

Transportation Company

Non Profit

Pharma/Biotech Company

Marketing Services Firm

Compare AutoSys Workload Automation with alternative products

Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation

AutoSys Workload Automation is known for its user-friendly capabilities, effectively handling cross-platform job scheduling with mainframe integration. It supports high availability, ensuring reliable performance for critical operations. Despite enhancements needed in its GUI and integration capabilities, AutoSys remains effective for batch processing, file transfers, ETL, and managing dependencies across servers and applications. Improvements are suggested for deployment complexity and monitoring features. More effective licensing and scalability solutions, along with modern subscription models and cloud integration, could address cost and automation barriers.

What are AutoSys Workload Automation's key features?

Robust Scheduling: Automates job scheduling across multiple platforms efficiently.
Advanced Security: Ensures secure management of workloads.
High Availability: Maintains performance during critical operations.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly integrates with diverse systems.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise demands.

What benefits should users expect from AutoSys Workload Automation?

Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual task management.
Enhanced Job Management: Improves oversight and control over job processes.
Flexibility in Scheduling: Offers adaptable scheduling and monitoring options.
Reliability: Consistent job execution without failures.
Security: Protects enterprise-level operations.

In industries like banking, insurance, and retail, AutoSys Workload Automation facilitates 24/7 automated job execution, ensuring smooth task automation. It allows companies to manage enterprise workloads effectively, catering to batch processing, file transfers, and handling job dependencies in a consistent manner.

AutoSys Workload Automation was previously known as CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE .