Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tekton Logo

Top 10 Tekton Alternatives

Vendor: Google
3.8 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Tekton Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tekton based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Jenkins. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Tekton Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Tekton Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5

Users have expressed satisfaction with various aspects, highlighting its quality, functionality, and value for money. They appreciate its user-friendly interface and the convenience it offers.

Additionally, users have praised the prompt and helpful customer support provided. Some users have also mentioned the product's durability and reliability. 

Download GitLab vs. Tekton Report
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
View comparison
Pricing
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
Tekton Logo
Tekton Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Tekton provides a Kubernetes-driven solution, emphasizing flexibility and scalability in CI/CD tasks. In comparison, VMware Tanzu offers robust infrastructure integration, particularly within the VMware ecosystem. Tekton excels in cost-effectiveness, while Tanzu suits enterprises needing comprehensive, integrated management within VMware's environment.
Download Tekton vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Tekton offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves higher setup expenses reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves higher setup expenses reflecting its comprehensive features.
Tekton Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins offers extensive plugin integration, ideal for diverse development needs. In comparison, Tekton excels in cloud environments with Kubernetes support, enhancing scalability. Jenkins requires plugin management improvements, while Tekton's YAML complexity may affect usability. Both provide cost-effective open-source solutions with unique strengths.
Download Jenkins vs. Tekton Report
Jenkins has no setup cost, while Tekton also offers a free setup, highlighting their accessibility for different needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Jenkins has no setup cost, while Tekton also offers a free setup, highlighting their accessibility for different needs.
Tekton Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
Tekton Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
Tekton offers Kubernetes-native capabilities perfect for organizations leveraging Kubernetes for CI/CD processes. In comparison, GitHub Actions provides seamless GitHub integration, simplifying CI/CD pipelines with user-friendly setup. Each platform excels in different environments, catering to varied user needs and preferences.
Download GitHub Actions vs. Tekton Report
Tekton has a higher initial setup cost compared to GitHub Actions, which offers more cost-efficient setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton has a higher initial setup cost compared to GitHub Actions, which offers more cost-efficient setup options.
Tekton Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
Bamboo excels with Atlassian integration, offering flexible build and deployment plans. In comparison, Tekton, designed for Kubernetes environments, features high scalability and parallel task execution, making it suitable for cloud-native projects focused on containerization and those seeking extensive customization capabilities.
Download Bamboo vs. Tekton Report
Bamboo has a higher setup cost compared to Tekton, highlighting the initial investment required. Tekton offers a more cost-effective setup, attracting budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Bamboo has a higher setup cost compared to Tekton, highlighting the initial investment required. Tekton offers a more cost-effective setup, attracting budget-conscious users.
Tekton Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
Harness provides an advantage in pricing and customer support, making it ideal for those prioritizing simplicity and ease of deployment. In comparison, Tekton offers robust features and high flexibility, appealing to users needing extensive functionality and customization in Kubernetes-native environments.
Download Harness vs. Tekton Report
Harness has a higher setup cost compared to Tekton, which is known for its cost-efficiency. While Harness offers extensive features that might justify its price, Tekton provides an affordable alternative with fundamental capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Harness has a higher setup cost compared to Tekton, which is known for its cost-efficiency. While Harness offers extensive features that might justify its price, Tekton provides an affordable alternative with fundamental capabilities.
Tekton Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
Tekton Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
Tekton suits developers in Kubernetes environments due to customization and microservices support. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline fits well with AWS-native workflows, offering seamless integration. Tekton is open-source, reducing costs, while AWS CodePipeline's pay-as-you-go model aligns costs with usage.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton Report
Tekton offers a cost-effective setup, while AWS CodePipeline involves higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton offers a cost-effective setup, while AWS CodePipeline involves higher initial costs.
Tekton Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
Tekton Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity offers flexible CI capabilities with cross-platform builds and an extensive plugin ecosystem, including Octopus Deploy. In comparison, Tekton excels with Kubernetes-native features for efficient cloud scaling and a serverless architecture, providing advanced customization options within Kubernetes environments.
Download TeamCity vs. Tekton Report
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
Tekton Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
Tekton Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
CircleCI emphasizes ease of use and robust support, appealing to teams seeking simplicity and efficient deployment. In comparison, Tekton offers advanced customization and an open-source architecture, making it ideal for developers prioritizing flexibility and integration within Kubernetes environments.
Download CircleCI vs. Tekton Report
CircleCI offers a competitive setup cost with user-friendly deployment, while Tekton provides a flexible, open-source solution with minimal initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a competitive setup cost with user-friendly deployment, while Tekton provides a flexible, open-source solution with minimal initial expenses.
Tekton Logo
Bazel
1 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Bazel
1 out of 5

From startup to enterprise, choose the Bazel open source project to build and test your multi-language, multi-platform projects.

View comparison
Tekton Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
Tekton Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
GoCD's powerful visualization and pipeline management make it ideal for complex workflows seeking straightforward deployment and support. In comparison, Tekton's Kubernetes-native design suits cloud-native environments, offering flexibility for teams adept in container orchestration despite potential challenges in integration.
Download GoCD vs. Tekton Report
GoCD's setup cost is significantly higher with extensive configuration needs, while Tekton offers a more streamlined and low-cost setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD's setup cost is significantly higher with extensive configuration needs, while Tekton offers a more streamlined and low-cost setup process.
Tekton Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
Tekton Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
Tekton is ideal for cloud-native environments with its Kubernetes-centric design and serverless architecture. In comparison, CloudBees offers robust integration with various tools and advanced security features. Tekton's open-source nature reduces costs, while CloudBees provides enterprise benefits suitable for complex environments.
Download CloudBees vs. Tekton Report
Tekton features a low initial setup cost, whereas CloudBees involves a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference necessary for consideration.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton features a low initial setup cost, whereas CloudBees involves a higher upfront investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference necessary for consideration.
Tekton Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
Tekton Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
Tekton excels with its Kubernetes-native architecture, ideal for scalable CI/CD in containerized environments. In comparison, AWS CodeBuild ensures seamless AWS integration and resource scaling without dedicated infrastructure. Tekton is cost-effective and customizable, while AWS CodeBuild offers elasticity and efficient computing resource management.
Download AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton Report
Tekton offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while AWS CodeBuild requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while AWS CodeBuild requires a higher initial investment.
Tekton Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
Travis CI attracts with straightforward configuration and GitHub integration, making it ideal for quick deployments. In comparison, Tekton captivates with its serverless architecture and Kubernetes-native integration, offering granular control. Travis CI suits smaller teams; Tekton appeals to enterprises needing extensive customization.
Travis CI has a straightforward setup cost, while Tekton is more complex with potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting the contrast in installation simplicity between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Travis CI has a straightforward setup cost, while Tekton is more complex with potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting the contrast in installation simplicity between the two.
Tekton Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
Tekton Logo
Buildkite
4.1 out of 5
Tekton offers seamless Kubernetes integration and is scalable, benefiting from its serverless nature. In comparison, Buildkite provides intuitive YAML workflows and effective Docker caching, minimizing build times. Tekton is ideal for Kubernetes, while Buildkite excels in flexibility and integration with AWS.
Download Buildkite vs. Tekton Report
Tekton has a lower setup cost which suits budget-conscious teams, while Buildkite offers a more comprehensive setup with higher initial expenses, appealing to organizations prioritizing advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton has a lower setup cost which suits budget-conscious teams, while Buildkite offers a more comprehensive setup with higher initial expenses, appealing to organizations prioritizing advanced features.

Related categories

Build Automation
Application Security Tools
Release Automation