CircleCI vs Tekton comparison

CircleCI and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CircleCI is ranked #14 with an average rating of 4.0, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. CircleCI holds a 3.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of CircleCI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

CircleCI

Read 5 CircleCI reviews

1,035 Views
1,035 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

3,996 Views
3,996 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

CircleCI and Tekton compete in the continuous integration and continuous delivery space. CircleCI provides a better overall experience for teams prioritizing ease of integration, whereas Tekton's strength is in offering advanced features for customization, especially in Kubernetes environments.

Features: CircleCI includes container-based builds, offers integration with Bitbucket, and enables encryption of environment variables, providing usability for teams without deep DevOps expertise. Tekton is Kubernetes-native, allowing for orchestration of complex pipelines and automated scaling, which is beneficial for executing intricate tasks within Kubernetes. Tekton supports tasks related to automation tools like Fortify and SonarQube and is adaptable for various automation scenarios.

Room for Improvement: CircleCI could enhance integration with container orchestration platforms and expand support for on-premises environments. It might also broaden customization options for teams that require more control. Tekton's setup can be complex for new users, and log management isn't very intuitive, which demands a learning curve. Enhanced customer support accessibility and more comprehensive documentation would also benefit Tekton users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CircleCI offers streamlined deployment in cloud environments, supported by strong customer service that facilitates ease of use. Tekton integrates tightly with Kubernetes, which can demand more initial setup effort but offers robust customization once configured. While Tekton provides flexibility, its customer support might not always be readily accessible, posing challenges for new users.

Pricing and ROI: CircleCI's lower setup costs and competitive pricing offer strong ROI for organizations looking to optimize operational efficiency. Its payment structures cater to different team sizes, promoting immediate financial returns through operational efficiencies. Tekton can incur higher initial expenses due to its complexity, but offers long-term ROI for companies leveraging its Kubernetes-native strengths for comprehensive applications. Its open-source nature can also lead to cost savings in environments heavily invested in Kubernetes.

To learn more, read our detailed CircleCI vs. Tekton Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. Tekton

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

14th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 3.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 9.9%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tekton	9.9%
CircleCI	3.3%
Other	86.8%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer0972521

Chief Technology Officer at Kyberlife

Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage

We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and environment. That costs us credits. Support engineers do not thoroughly read and understand issues when emailing them. They reply to me with a totally different context about the problem. Just yesterday, my web applications failed to 'yarn build' after I downgraded the resource class from extr-large to large. I contacted support and got no reply. Billing is a mess. There is duplicate information in the bill downloaded from their website and when I asked for a consolidated bill, they just answered that they didn't have it. There is no transparency on how many billed minutes and credits I spent each day both on their website and the monthly bill which makes it difficult to understand when the monthly bill contains many refill item charges. It is difficult or impossible to track usage and burndown of my subscription and to gain total outstanding refill amounts on a daily basis. Their website doesn't provide sufficient information on credits allocated/calculated for my extra-large resource class.

Read full review

Prasad Gupta

Software Engineer at IBM Software Labs

Efficient CI/CD management with significant cost reduction and a user-friendly setup

One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"It's a stable product."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"The ability to scale is valuable."

"Tekton is serverless and runs on OpenShift, and we leverage Tekton to take full advantage of the Kubernetes features such as running and scaling the solution in PaaS."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

"One of the best things I appreciate is that Tekton runs on the Kubernetes platform. This is very useful when working on a project with other team members. For instance, suppose we have a very big project that requires building a large amount of source code or running many unit tests. During the build and unit test phases, Tekton on Kubernetes allows us to have a scalable machine to handle these tasks. This scalability is the most useful aspect for me."

"We can make a lot of customizations, and data sharing between tasks using workspaces is very convenient."

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"Tekton provides a feature where you can schedule the job."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Billing is a mess."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"The stability issues can be there."

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"When we started with Tekton around 2021 or early 2022, the community support was somewhat limited, which posed challenges when dealing with issues or debugging. We had to rely on Red Hat OpenShift support to overcome these challenges. However, I believe that these issues will naturally improve over timeas the developer community grows stronger. From a technical perspective, I haven't had the opportunity to deeply evaluate the product end-to-end, especially in the past year or so, when I've been less involved with it."

"Incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"Compared to traditional tools like Jenkins, Tekton lacks a lot of features. It's not efficient in managing conflicts between multiple pipelines."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CircleCI?

The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly billing statement is almost unreadable and their online dashboard doesn't provide ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

Comparisons

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 18% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 16% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 14% of the time

Harness vs CircleCI

Compared 12% of the time

Jenkins vs CircleCI

Compared 6% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 31% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 5% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

August 2025

Download CircleCI product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

August 2025

Download Tekton product report

Overview

CircleCI is a leading platform for automating continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), valued for its capability to manage software updates efficiently. With an easy-to-configure system using YAML files and robust Docker support, CircleCI streamlines backend updates, frontend developments, and mobile app testing across devices. Its parallelism feature and insightful dashboard reduce processing times and improve workflow visibility, respectively, enhancing team collaboration and productivity while maintaining high-quality outputs across development stages.

CircleCI

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. Tekton

September 2025

Free Report: CircleCI vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about CircleCI vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CircleCI vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.