GitHub Actions vs Tekton comparison

GitHub and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 11.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

GitHub Actions

Read 21 GitHub Actions reviews

2,562 Views
1,997 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

4,437 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and GitHub Actions compete in the CI/CD tools category. Tekton, with its Kubernetes-centric design and high customizability, holds the upper hand for users needing deep integration with Kubernetes environments. In contrast, GitHub Actions excels in ease of use and integration within GitHub, making it more approachable for quick CI/CD deployments.

Features: Tekton provides seamless Kubernetes integration, high customizability, and scalability to fit containerized environments. GitHub Actions offers strong GitHub integration, automation features, and user-friendly setups with minimal configuration.

Room for Improvement: Tekton could enhance its user documentation, simplify YAML configurations, and improve tool integrations. GitHub Actions would benefit from better logging, expanded integration options, and improved debugging support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton is versatile across various environments with robust support from Red Hat for OpenShift, though community support is mixed. GitHub Actions, primarily used in public cloud settings, offers straightforward deployment through GitHub and relies on community support for assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton, as an open-source tool on OpenShift, offers significant cost savings and operational efficiency. GitHub Actions is also free for individual users, with enterprise use potentially incurring costs. Both tools have cost-effective open-source structures and demonstrate value in reducing operational expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Actions vs. Tekton Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,874 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitHub Actions is 11.5%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.0%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

MohamedMostafa1

Chief Software Engineer at Valeo

Handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurationsThe automation feature of GitHub Actions is

I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"It is a very stable solution as we have not faced any issues."

"The most valuable features of GitHub Actions include its seamless integration within GitHub, which simplifies the CI/CD pipeline setup. The scalability of using different types of runners—both public and private runners—enhances deployment flexibility."

"The most valuable feature of GitHub Actions is the ability to automate various tasks, such as backups and deployments, to ease the development workflow."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

"We can trigger files manually or automate processes."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"GitHub Actions is a beautiful tool that integrates smoothly with all major tools, reducing CI/CD work by 30% to 40%."

More GitHub Actions pros

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"You can isolate most Tekton assets in the Kubernetes namespace for your feature branch. This allows you to freely change Tekton assets and objects to adapt to your feature branch and requirements."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"I like the branching and visualization tools for the pipeline."

"When you run a pipeline, all the jobs are called. It is a very valuable feature that enhances job maintenance overall."

"Tekton allows you to categorize tasks according to your needs and minimizes the amount of code needed."

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"The feature that I like most about Tekton is that it is built for Kubernetes, so we can utilize our resources effectively."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"There is a part that detects outdated libraries. If that feature could be more intuitive and informative, that would be nice."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"The only issue I have faced is with authorization, particularly when configuring the GitHub token correctly."

"We still use Jenkins for some tasks, which suggests there may be areas for improvement in GitHub Actions."

"In our company, procedures or rules need to be completed, which is not a problem with GitHub Actions but with our process."

"My company would want to see some AI features in the tool as it can add value to the product."

"In terms of improvements, I think better logging for debugging purposes would be helpful, especially for complex workflows."

"The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited."

More GitHub Actions cons

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Tekton could improve by adding better documentation."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

"Tekton is a good product with all the features I need. There isn't anything that needs improvement."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The solution is open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free of cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,874 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

I would need to check with my team about specific shortcomings. We still use Jenkins ( /products/jenkins-reviews ) for some tasks, which suggests there may be areas for improvement in GitHub Actions.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 15% of the time

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Actions

Compared 4% of the time

CircleCI vs GitHub Actions

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

June 2025

Download GitHub Actions product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

May 2025

Download Tekton product report

Overview

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Actions vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,874 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Actions vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.