Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Pulseway based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and PRTG Network Monitor.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Pulseway Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Pulseway, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Zabbix offers extensive customization and flexibility, making it suitable for large enterprises requiring deep configurability. In comparison, Pulseway provides real-time monitoring and a user-friendly mobile app, ideal for on-the-go management. Tech buyers might choose Pulseway for ease of use and Zabbix for scalability.
Comparing setup costs, Zabbix offers a lower upfront setup fee while Pulseway includes higher setup expenses. Zabbix may suit those looking for more budget-friendly options, whereas Pulseway accommodates broader setups with the associated cost.
Comparing setup costs, Zabbix offers a lower upfront setup fee while Pulseway includes higher setup expenses. Zabbix may suit those looking for more budget-friendly options, whereas Pulseway accommodates broader setups with the associated cost.
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive features like patch management and software deployment. In comparison, Pulseway appeals to users looking for simplicity and mobile access. Pricing models differ, with Pulseway offering budget-friendly options for smaller businesses.
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and extensive sensor availability, appealing to those seeking scalable and comprehensive network insights. In comparison, Pulseway provides remote control and mobile access, attracting tech buyers needing flexible management and affordable pricing for interactive control.
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, highlighting a budget-friendly advantage for Pulseway, while PRTG provides robust capabilities that may justify the additional cost.
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, highlighting a budget-friendly advantage for Pulseway, while PRTG provides robust capabilities that may justify the additional cost.
Pulseway's affordable pricing and simpler deployment attract businesses needing effective IT management with limited resources. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center appeals to enterprises demanding sophisticated network automation and policy-based security, requiring greater investment but offering extensive control and comprehensive solutions for complex infrastructure.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
Pulseway excels in ease of deployment and customer service, while NinjaOne offers stronger features and a robust ROI. In comparison, Pulseway benefits from real-time monitoring and strong scripting, and NinjaOne is preferred for automated workflows and comprehensive reporting.
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
Pulseway excels in real-time remote management with intuitive mobility. In comparison, Checkmk offers robust scalability suited for larger infrastructures. Pulseway's pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, whereas Checkmk's comprehensive features justify its higher investment. Pulseway's ease of deployment contrasts with Checkmk's extensive documentation for complex configurations.
Pulseway's setup cost is minimal with easy configuration, while Checkmk requires a higher initial investment with a complex setup process. Pulseway is budget-friendly for small teams, whereas Checkmk targets larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
Pulseway's setup cost is minimal with easy configuration, while Checkmk requires a higher initial investment with a complex setup process. Pulseway is budget-friendly for small teams, whereas Checkmk targets larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
Kaseya VSA excels in automation and remote management, offering efficient patching and inventory modules. In comparison, Pulseway's robust remote access and mobile features allow quick user responses. Tech buyers might choose Kaseya for its seamless remote support or Pulseway for cost-effectiveness and ease of setup.
Pulseway attracts IT professionals with intuitive control and scalability for efficient solutions. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard is favored for comprehensive features and reliability in network management. Pulseway is budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard offers advanced insights and extensive capabilities.
Pulseway has an affordable setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard typically involves higher initial expenses due to its enterprise-grade offerings.
Pulseway has an affordable setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard typically involves higher initial expenses due to its enterprise-grade offerings.
Pulseway offers cost-efficient licenses with real-time monitoring and automation, ideal for those prioritizing affordability and support. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance appeals to enterprises needing network resilience and in-depth analytics, despite higher costs and a more complex setup.
Pulseway's setup cost is manageable and straightforward, catering to smaller businesses, whereas Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance demands a higher initial investment, reflecting a focus on large enterprises and extensive networking features.
Pulseway's setup cost is manageable and straightforward, catering to smaller businesses, whereas Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance demands a higher initial investment, reflecting a focus on large enterprises and extensive networking features.
ConnectWise Automate excels with its extensive automation and integration, ideal for those valuing powerful remote management. In comparison, Pulseway’s mobile accessibility and intuitive design make it appealing for businesses prioritizing real-time monitoring and quick deployment despite higher pricing.
Pulseway excels with mobile-first monitoring and automation, ideal for dynamic environments. In comparison, Datto RMM's advanced networking and integration appeal to larger enterprises. Pulseway's competitive pricing benefits small businesses, while Datto RMM's extensive features offer long-term ROI for complex operations.
Pulseway has no setup cost, making it more cost-effective initially, while Datto Remote Monitoring and Management includes a setup fee, which may reflect its comprehensive service features.
Pulseway has no setup cost, making it more cost-effective initially, while Datto Remote Monitoring and Management includes a setup fee, which may reflect its comprehensive service features.
