My primary use case for Proxmox VE focuses on replacing VMware solutions and migrating to a Centric Solution for medium-sized companies. This product serves as a hypervisor in environments where performance is crucial.
Proxmox VE offers seamless virtualization with no CPU or memory restrictions, intuitive interface, and high scalability. Users benefit from open-source flexibility, stability, and cost-efficiency, making it a favored choice for diverse deployment environments from on-premises to cloud setups.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Proxmox VE | 10.4% |
| Hyper-V | 19.8% |
| VMware vSphere | 19.1% |
| Other | 50.699999999999996% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Server Virtualization Software | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Proxmox VE vs Hyper-V | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Proxmox VE vs Red Hat OpenShift | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware vSphere | 4.4 | 19.1% | 94% | 461 interviewsAdd to research |
| Hyper-V | 4.0 | 19.8% | 86% | 145 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 34 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 805 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 394 |
| Large Enterprise | 1028 |
Proxmox VE provides a robust platform for full and container-based virtualization, allowing for integration with numerous systems and excellent performance capabilities. Despite needing improvement in Windows and OSX support, USB virtualization, and documentation, it excels in live migration, backup, and high availability features. Its active community supports continuous improvements, and its open-source nature offers unparalleled resource management flexibility. Ideal for production and testing environments, Proxmox VE serves a wide range of virtualization tasks, including application hosting and running databases in both cloud and on-premise setups. Users can appreciate the cost-effectiveness of Proxmox VE along with the benefits of open-source development and scalable solutions.
What are the key features of Proxmox VE?In industries like IT services, education, and research, Proxmox VE is employed for virtualization in both on-premises and cloud setups. Organizations efficiently deploy virtual machines for testing, training, and hosting applications, benefiting from high availability and robust resource management. Its versatility supports deployment of development environments and running cloud applications.
Municipality of Trento, SwitchMIA, inDenova, Valmeita City Council, Alpha IT AS, Grupo Inversor Veracruzano S.A.P.I. de C.V. (GRIVER), Laut und Schoen, IT-Services - Hamburg e.K., KMI Learning, Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd., Serwise AG
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CTO at BCloud Services SAC | 5.0 | I use Proxmox VE to replace VMware solutions for medium-sized companies, valuing its performance, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency in managing virtual machines. Improvements are needed in replication for disaster recovery and driver support, but the ROI is significant, making it a preferred choice. |
| Managing Partner at Dynamis Informatica | 4.5 | Proxmox VE is an easy-to-set-up, robust enterprise solution that manages clusters across sites. It offers better performance on existing hardware compared to VMware, though its complex installation and reliance on the ZFS file system require improvement in documentation and resources. |
| Independent Consultant at Toby Champion Associates | 5.0 | I use Proxmox VE primarily for virtual machines, appreciating its user-friendly interface, though the API needs improvement for better feature access. It provides a valuable learning experience in virtualization, despite minor challenges with licensing and integration. |
| Enterprise Solutions Executive at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 2.0 | We are a cloud provider using Proxmox VE, appreciating the KVM hypervisor but experiencing issues with disk performance, utilization, and server freezing. It works well for smaller setups but struggles with large-scale environments, prompting us to consider VMware migration. |
| Systeme engineer at Waykos | 3.5 | I primarily use Proxmox VE for virtualization and client migration. Its valuable features include an intuitive web page, dashboard, ease of use, helpful documentation, and community support. I researched Amazon, Azure, and IBM Watson before choosing Proxmox VE. |
| Engineer at Lite-On Technology Corp | 4.5 | I find the most valuable feature of Proxmox VE to be the linked clone. However, upgrading from version 6.2 to 7 is difficult without experience. Before choosing Proxmox VE, we considered VMware ESXi and oVirt from Red Hat. |
| Senior IT Consultant at Xerif | 5.0 | Proxmox VE is a virtual machine and container suite from Germany that simplifies the use of KVM with an easy-to-use interface. It's based on Debian Linux, offering comprehensive virtualization tools for production and testing, though limited to Debian only. |
| CISO And Senior Cloud Engineer at Kamena | 5.0 | I use Proxmox VE for managing virtual machines on three servers, primarily for database, application, and email functions. Its storage capabilities are a standout feature. However, direct import of OVF or OVA files would improve its functionality. I transitioned from VMware. |
| Cloud Engineer, Content Writer at Planet Flora | 5.0 | I use Proxmox VE for virtualization and as an Apache cloud stack backend, primarily for storage. The graphical interface simplifies backup and network management, though a Kubernetes port management feature would enhance it. Authentication is beneficial, ensuring secure operations. |
| Software Engineer at NTInet | 4.5 | I have extensive experience with Proxmox VE, having used it since 1994. Valuable features include VFXTHs for mitigating DDoS risks, though network integration could improve. Overall, I find Proxmox effective for managing and implementing high-performance applications. |

My primary use case for Proxmox VE focuses on replacing VMware solutions and migrating to a Centric Solution for medium-sized companies. This product serves as a hypervisor in environments where performance is crucial.
Proxmox VE has provided performance improvements, particularly with its container solution, and has offered robust support for KVM, which aligns well with businesses operating on Linux.
Some of the most valuable features of Proxmox VE include great performance, particularly in the container environment, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the ability to manage many virtual machines efficiently is crucial.
An area that could be improved is the replication of virtual machines from site to site for disaster recovery. Another noted issue is driver support for PCI components, which occasionally presents challenges.
The solution is known for its strong performance and stability, particularly in VE strategy.
Proxmox VE has a limitation of thirty-two nodes, however, this is generally sufficient as most clients do not require more than three or four nodes.
The customer service and support for Proxmox VE are excellent, especially due to their quick response times and fast updates for any issues related to drivers or other components.
Positive
We have evaluated VMware, Nutanix, HP with SimpliVity, and Huawei solutions. We chose Proxmox VE primarily due to its cost-effectiveness and better investment support.
The initial setup of Proxmox VE is straightforward and simple, scoring a ten out of ten for its ease of deployment.
Our company has a team of three technical people responsible for deploying solutions with Proxmox VE.
Proxmox VE provides significant cost savings, demonstrating a safe investment with improved efficiencies.
The pricing is very comfortable, particularly with the basic support plans, as enterprise-level support is often unnecessary for our clients.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Proxmox VE can manage clusters across sites. It is really easy to set up a cluster of products. It has a lot of integrations, and it works flawlessly. It is a very robust solution for any enterprise. Additionally, if needed, you can pay for support, which is much less expensive than VMware.
Many of my customers are moving away from VMware because of its acquisition by another company, which has resulted in skyrocketing prices, making it very expensive and viable only for larger enterprises.
Proxmox VE is easy to set up and can be used as off-the-shelf hardware. There is no need for dedicated hardware; it works out of the box with whatever hardware you have. It delivers more performance from the same hardware than VMware. It's faster and more efficient.
Some parts of the Proxmox installation are a bit complex. Proxmox relies on the ZFS file system, which can be difficult to understand and configure correctly. There is no documentation or videos to discuss the process.
I have been using Proxmox VE for six months.
There is a lot of documentation available for Proxmox VE, including papers, online tutorials, training materials, and free resources.
Positive
I did extensive research by myself and tried the standardization tools available on the market, both free and paid. Proxmox is by far the best option. For large enterprises, Proxmox is the preferred choice. Now that VMware has been acquired, many companies are trying to move away from it. I personally face a problem because I use VMware Workstation to visualize my work on my computer.
It is very easy to set up. It is a robust virtual environment and can be deployed within a few days. Typically, an environment can be set up in two, or three days. The most complicated part is migration from VMware. However, the new virtual Proxmox offers a built-in tool to directly connect to the VMware environment and convert the virtual machines to Proxmox.
You need to have one person with expertise in network components and configuration for that part of the physical environment. The most important aspect is working with the vendors who supply your standard software. This is often the most challenging part. You need to contact support to help set up the new environment if something changes. This process usually involves more time and effort to get the vendors to ensure compatibility with Proxmox. Many people, including those at Zendesk, are often reluctant to assure that Proxmox will work with other unfamiliar systems.
I rate the initial setup an eight to nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
Proxmox VE is open source and available under the GPLv3 license. If you want, you can pay for a subscription, which will give you access to additional updates, an updated repository for special updates, and support, allowing you to call them for help. However, if you prefer, you don't have to subscribe; you can use the product for free in any environment with no limitations or strings attached.
The cluster feature of Proxmox VE is very useful for us because all of our clients need some form of high availability. They need multiple nodes to shut down nodes for upgrades and move services to other nodes without experiencing downtime. The easy deployment of a web-based management interface is very useful for all our clients. Nobody wants to stay offline these days; everybody wants 24/7 operation. Proxmox VE meets this need cost-effectively.
Over 80% do not actually require continuous uptime. For example, pausing service for maintenance in the middle of the night for an hour or two is usually acceptable.
Proxmox VE does require the normal maintenance of a server. You need to have backups, and Proxmox provides its own free backup tool. It also works with VM, so everybody uses VMs. By using a Linux-based infrastructure and database, the maintenance is minimal. It's very stable—just keep the patches and updates regular, and you are good to go. It's not like a Windows environment, where sometimes things break.
Proxmox VE has robust security features. It can authenticate users independently or integrate with Active Directory and various other authentication services. It can connect to and manage multiple authentication systems seamlessly. In terms of updates, it uses a version-based system connected to both the public and subscription repositories. If you have a paid subscription, you gain access to the proprietary repository, which includes additional patches and fixes. Updates can be scheduled and performed automatically, ensuring the system remains stable and up-to-date. I have been using the system for a while now, and it consistently receives updates without any problems, maintaining its stability.
Proxmox VE is an excellent product. The available documentation might not be very user-friendly, especially for less experienced users. It often assumes that the user already has a certain level of expertise. For someone new to the digitalization world or with less experience, the documentation might not be very helpful. However, for an experienced user, it is easier to navigate and understand.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I utilize Proxmox VE primarily for running virtual machines instead of containers, especially for services that require the entire environment of a VM. Some of these services are easier to manage within a VM. Additionally, I use Docker for certain other services, running them within virtual machines hosted on Proxmox. Moreover, I ensure backup of my devices by utilizing a separate machine for backups.
Proxmox VE proved to be beneficial when I sought an alternative to running virtual machines solely on my laptop, which had been my setup for years. My criteria were clear: I needed a free, reliable solution with comprehensive documentation. The platform needed to perform seamlessly. One of my immediate requirements was to run Windows virtual machines, alongside hosting services like WikiMedia.
The integrated backup solution provided by Proxmox has significantly influenced our data protection strategy. It instills confidence in me knowing that I can efficiently back up my virtual machines using a seamlessly integrated solution within the Proxmox family of products. It has become the standard approach for data backup within our environment.
One of the standout features of Proxmox VE is its meticulously crafted web user interface, which is not only highly efficient but also exceptionally clear and user-friendly. In my experience, I've found it to be remarkably bug-free, and any issues that do arise are promptly addressed and resolved.
Improvements are needed for the API. Currently, there are several features inaccessible through the API, necessitating the use of either the WebUI or the command line interface. While the command line interface suffices, it's apparent that efforts are underway to enhance this aspect.
In future releases, one potential feature enhancement could be improved remote screen access, allowing users to connect to the screen of another machine more seamlessly. Additionally, integrating with Terraform or providing better support for Terraform workflows might be beneficial, as there seems to be some lacking in that area.
There's a minor inconvenience where you have to switch the license file from the open-source community license to an enterprise license.
I have been working with it for several years.
In terms of performance and stability, Proxmox stands out compared to other virtualization solutions I've used, such as VMware desktop, VirtualBox, and Parallels. While I've encountered instances where VirtualBox and VMware crashed, I've never experienced any issues with Proxmox crashing. While I haven't conducted any quantitative performance testing myself, I haven't noticed any significant performance drawbacks.
One standout capability is the seamless migration of virtual machines between servers with minimal downtime, emphasizing availability rather than scaling.
The documentation could be improved, I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of helpfulness and clarity.
Neutral
The initial setup was straightforward.
In terms of return on investment, Proxmox has provided me with an invaluable learning experience. It's the first hypervisor I've utilized on a server where I manage a cluster of Proxmox instances. This setup has allowed me to gain insights into the intricacies of virtualization and server management while keeping the hassle and stress to a minimum. The learning opportunity has been exceptional, and I've found it to be an enjoyable process.
Since Proxmox is open-source, it's freely available.
I would recommend Proxmox to others, but I advise ensuring that you have someone knowledgeable in Linux on hand. While I had some experience with the distribution, Proxmox still presented some learning curves. With a supportive community and growing user base, you'll likely find plenty of resources to address any challenges. Overall, I'm confident that with the right support, you'll have a smooth experience with Proxmox. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.

We are cloud providers. We install the product to serve our customers.
We are having some problems with the product. It is suitable for small companies with 20 to 100 servers. My organization has more than 2500 servers in the hypervisor platform. We have problems when we try to migrate some servers to Proxmox. We are facing issues with disk utilization and disk performance. We are considering migrating all the servers back to VMware. The product must improve the disk performance and disc issues in general. The servers in Proxmox freeze sometimes. The file systems become read-only file systems after we restart the server. These are the main problems we are having nowadays.
I have been using the solution for a year.
I rate the tool’s stability a five out of ten.
I rate the tool’s scalability a three out of ten. We set up 50 servers in our environment, which worked well. Then, when the virtual server numbers increased to 100, it worked fine. Later, when it was around 200 to 300, the performance got worse. It is getting worse with time. The more we scale, the more we have problems. Currently, we have 300 to 350 virtual servers. Our customers are small businesses.
We have trouble getting help from the support team.
Negative
I rate the ease of setup a four or five out of ten. The initial setup is not exactly difficult, but it is not easy either.
If the deployment is not very detailed, it takes us one day.
I rate the pricing a three out of ten. The product is free. There is no licensing fee. However, we do have to pay to get support. The support costs are reasonable.
I am using the latest version of the solution. I would recommend the solution for small businesses. I would not recommend it for medium and large enterprises. Overall, I rate the product a four out of ten.

The primary use case for Proxmox VE is virtualization for a company and migration of some clients to Proxmox. We implement virtual machines.
For my customer, it's too early to say that, but we hope they are satisfied with it. For our strategy in the interim, we are looking to promote this product in the future.
The web page, the dashboard, and the ease of use are most valuable. The documentation and the community support are also very helpful.
For now, it’s too early to determine what needs improvement as it's only been three months. I don't have enough experience to say what can be improved.
I have used the solution for three months.
Proxmox VE is stable. At the beginning, there were some minor issues, but they were easily resolved.
I have not tried to scale it yet.
The initial setup was straightforward. It took only one day to deploy. Clear documentation made the process smooth.
During the initial setup, I just followed instructions from my manager.
The pricing is very competitive. Proxmox VE is more affordable than its competitors, such as VMware.
Please read the official documentation thoroughly. It is comprehensive and very useful.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is the linked clone.
The solution is not good at upgrading and this is why I using version 6.2 and not version 7. There is no easy way to implement the upgrade. I don't have enough experience to do it safely.
I have been using Proxmox VE for approximately two years.
Proxmox VE is highly stable.
I rate the stability of Proxmox VE a ten out of ten.
The solution can scale but it is not perfect.
We use this solution in the branch office in Beijing. We have approximately 25 people in the office and 15 of them will use something built on Proxmox VE.
I rate the scalability of Proxmox VE a seven out of ten.
I have not used the support from Proxmox VE.
I did not use a similar solution prior to Proxmox VE.
It's straightforward to get started with Proxmox VE, but if you want to do something more advanced, it can become complex. The installation process is simple as long as you set up the cluster correctly. Setting up the cluster is straightforward, but when you try to do something more advanced, the complexity increases significantly.
We are using the free community version of Proxmox VE.
We evaluated VMware ESXi and oVirt from Red Hat before choosing Proxmox VE.
Proxmox VE and VMware ESXi are great options for beginners. I have some experience with Linux, which is sufficient for setting up the Proxmox VE environment and VMware ESXi. These two solutions are ideal choices for a small office.
I rate Proxmox VE a nine out of ten.

Proxmox is a virtual machine and container suite with everything in one place. It does not use Docker directly but uses a specific tool called LXC for containers. They also use it with KVM to offer customers a unified and easy-to-use graphical tool along with a very powerful command line suite of tools for visualization.
Proxmox is from Germany. It is a free product that has all the features, just like the commercial license. The difference is that the customer has access to additional repositories in commercially licensed versions. These include extra plug-ins and capabilities that eventually are used in a production environment.
The free or community edition has a complete suite of virtualization tools and high availability capabilities to provide a complete scenario for production, testing, etc. Proxmox VE is a very, very good product. Proxmox VE is a Debian Linux-based product that can be downloaded on an ISO archive or installed in a Debian Linux environment that the customer already has.
The solution's most valuable feature is that it allows customers to use the power of KVM easily. KVM is a very powerful and difficult tool to use, but Proxmox VE makes it easy.
Proxmox VE editions should be made available to other Linux distributions because they are only attached to Debian. There are people unfamiliar with Debian or have no environment with Debian. It would be very nice if Proxmox VE could eventually port to other Linux distributions.
I have been using Proxmox VE for ten years.
Proxmox VE is a very stable solution.
I rate the solution’s stability ten out of ten.
Proxmox VE is a very scalable solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.
The solution’s pricing is very fair. The solution's pricing is cheaper than other solutions like VMware, Hyper-V, or Oracle.
Since Proxmox VE has its own firewall, I can use it eventually to manage access to my different virtual machines and containers. The solution provides very good security.
Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

I'm using Proxmox VE for virtual machines on three servers, mainly for the database and the application and email server.
High availability and self healing
Proxmox VE can improve by importing OVF or OVA files directly from OVA. I need to convert all the images to raw images before importing them to Proxmox VE. If there is a solution that I can import directly from VMDK, it would be better.
I think it support esxi migration tools which is awesome
I have been using Proxmox VE for approximately 7 years.
Proxmox VE is highly stable, it is a great solution as a hypervisor.
The scalability of Proxmox VE is good.
We have approximately three administrators that use the solution. We do not have plans to increase the usage.
We have approximately 20 virtual machines on the Proxmox VE server.
I have not needed direct support from Proxmox VE. I have found the community support enough.
I switched from VMware to Proxmox VE.
The initial setup of Proxmox VE was straightforward.
There is an annual license to use Proxmox VE and it is approximately $90. There are not any additional costs.
Esxi
xenserver
I rate Proxmox VE a ten out of ten.
We use the solution for virtualization and Apache cloud stack backend. It is mainly used for storage. We are using the FTP application on Proxmox VE.
When I migrate the website to the Proxmox server, there is a flex server installed on Proxmox VE. I migrated my website in one day with zero downtime.
The solution provides a graphical interface, which is very useful for backup, snapshots, and managing the network. It also has authentication, which is very useful too. We have a single machine and hardware.
There should be a helm feature for managing Kubernetes ports directly from the Proxmox traffic interface.
I have been using Proxmox VE for two months.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
Three people including one cloud member and internals, are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight-point five out of ten.
The initial setup takes 15-20 minutes on Google Cloud with Persistent SSDs, but on a home server, it can take up to 30 minutes.
I rate the initial setup a nine-point five out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
The product has a reasonable pricing.
I recommended the solution since it is a community-based solution and cost-effective.
Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

In 1994, I started to work with Proxmox VE. Since 2020, I have developed much expertise in Proxmox VE and have helped many organizations with their Proxmox VE needs. During this time, I have studied Linux, maintenance, and troubleshooting and helped organizations successfully implement and manage Proxmox VE.
To mitigate DDoS risks on Proxmox VE, we use VFXTHs, which are a better way to take snapshots for high-performance applications. I have seen that VFXTHs are being developed to cache and block traffic, which is a promising development.
I have a program on my old machine with 380 events, but I need to create new events. This is much easier to do with VFXTHs, and I have the skills to do it. I also have two VPNs running on the old machine, which I can use to get started.
Proxmox needs to improve the integration of its network, machines, and virtual machines. It is very difficult to test, but it is possible to use scripts to make the process easier.
The documentation is good. When I needed some kind of support, I found it on the Internet.
The initial setup is easy.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.