Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

3.6 out of 5

22 reviews
83% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers accurate vulnerability detection, a Guided Scan option for easy reporting, and a centralized dashboard for management. Despite its scalability and comprehensive assessments, it suffers from setup complexity, slow reporting, and high resource consumption on-premise. Users face integration issues with cloud services, performance problems, and a high price point. Better automation and support for diverse file extensions are needed to enhance usability and reduce skill dependency.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides a Guided Scan option for easy scanning and report sharing.

Technical support has been noted as good, with helpful assistance.

The centralized dashboard is highlighted as valuable, offering a bird's eye view of vulnerabilities and assisting with management at the central level.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing efficiently detects a wide range of vulnerabilities, surpassing other products.

It provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments, streamlining web application security and ensuring secure deliverables.

CONS

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing requires better integration with Microsoft's Azure and other cloud providers, which is currently challenging from a cloud perspective.

Scanning with OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is resource-intensive, with high memory requirements making it cumbersome for an enterprise web application.

The pricing of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is criticized for being too high, particularly when compared to other tools with similar functionalities.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing has been reported to freeze up and become non-functional, causing significant frustration.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing needs faster scanning capabilities, as the current speed is perceived as slow by users.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Pros review quotes

AP

Cyber Security Consultant at Deloitte

Aug 7, 2025

I'm sorry, but there is no review content provided to extract a quote from.

Read full review

MS

Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 11, 2021

Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features.

Read full review

TN

Theeradach Noisaeng

Director at Eguardian lanka

Jun 11, 2024

The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received.

Read full review

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MS

Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 24, 2019

I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level.

Read full review

Ilyas Sadibekov

Consulting Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Mar 21, 2023

There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful.

Read full review

Services Project Lead, Information Technology at IGT Solutions

Oct 28, 2024

The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients.

Read full review

General Manager at Inexion Co.

Aug 18, 2023

The solution's technical support was very helpful.

Read full review

FP

Senior Manager - IT Security & ISMS at Ericsson

Apr 25, 2023

Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Sep 16, 2024

It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple.

Read full review

Security Engineer at Secure Network

Oct 29, 2020

The solution is easy to use.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 22)

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Cons review quotes

MS

Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 11, 2021

It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application.

Read full review

TN

Theeradach Noisaeng

Director at Eguardian lanka

Jun 11, 2024

I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them.

Read full review

MS

Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 24, 2019

I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities.

Read full review

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ilyas Sadibekov

Consulting Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Mar 21, 2023

We have had a problem with authentification.

Read full review

Services Project Lead, Information Technology at IGT Solutions

Oct 28, 2024

I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker.

Read full review

General Manager at Inexion Co.

Aug 18, 2023

Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment.

Read full review

FP

Senior Manager - IT Security & ISMS at Ericsson

Apr 25, 2023

Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems.

Read full review

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Sep 16, 2024

There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan.

Read full review

Security Engineer at Secure Network

Oct 29, 2020

The scanner could be better.

Read full review

reviewer1268340

Assoc. Director at Cognizant

Feb 9, 2020

The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 20)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Snyk vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

WhiteHat Dynamic vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Appknox vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

StackHawk vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Snyk vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

WhiteHat Dynamic vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Appknox vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

StackHawk vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

See all alternatives

Related questions

37

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

14

Which solution do you prefer: Fortify WebInspect or HCL AppScan?

9

When evaluating Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

7

Why is Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) important for companies?