OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 11.5% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

7,208 Views
2,883 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 21 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

3,592 Views
1,688 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are competing in the application security testing market. Rapid7 InsightAppSec appears to have an edge due to its robust feature set.

Features: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers comprehensive scanning capabilities, seamless integration, and efficient vulnerability management. Rapid7 InsightAppSec stands out with advanced automation, extensive real-time analytics, and a highly detailed reporting system.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance automation, improve real-time analytics, and streamline the initial configuration process. Rapid7 InsightAppSec may address issues in user interface consistency, better manage browser dependencies for exports, and reduce its pricing structure for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightAppSec is noted for its straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive customer support. OpenText might involve more initial configuration but benefits from a robust support network.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has been recognized for its cost-effectiveness and competitive upfront pricing, offering a substantial return on investment. Rapid7 InsightAppSec is potentially more expensive but is valued for its comprehensive functionality, appealing to those prioritizing feature depth and innovation.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (11th)

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 11.5%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 5.6%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	11.5%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec	5.6%
Other	82.9%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

ArnabPaul

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.

Read full review

Brandi Lea

Regional Information Security Analyst, Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Rapid risk detection has transformed how I uncover hidden vulnerabilities in new applications

Rapid7 InsightAppSec offers excellent features including a cloud-based platform that allows for detailed breakdowns of information into more digestible bits. The platform is user-friendly with a broad range of tools, although it does require quite a bit of a learning curve. It allows me to aggregate data and put it into presentations to send to executives about the security status across the entire enterprise. My favorite aspect of the user-friendly interface of Rapid7 is the primary cloud-based dashboard, which I find most useful. I love that even inside a browser, the intuitive help options are available for figuring out what things are, whether it's hovering over a particular option for insights or using right-click features that offer tools and tips on managing the vulnerabilities when found. The interface is very clean, not overly convoluted or difficult to navigate, which I do enjoy. Rapid7 has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to discover vulnerabilities, both publicly known and zero-day, much faster and efficiently than I ever did in the past, ultimately saving the company a lot of money in compliance issues, fines, and possibly even lawsuits. The number of vulnerabilities I am discovering has improved by almost thirty seven percent in the last two years alone. Remediation especially has increased significantly because I am finding these vulnerabilities faster, and Rapid7 provides tips on how to remediate or harden against them, whether through hardening options or upgrading to better versions, which does save the company money.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is a good option for enterprise-level organizations."

"It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning."

"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."

"The FPA and Audit Workbench are very helpful for me, and when we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities, with very detailed examples for each vulnerability, so it is very good for users and beginners and doesn't take a lot of time to understand the tool."

"I'm sorry, but there is no review content provided to extract a quote from."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The solution's technical support was very helpful."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"The solution is stable."

"For our needs, Rapid7 was the ideal go-to tool."

"It uses a signature-based method to check for problems with your code and will provide an alert if anything is found."

"Customers use the product for scanning purposes and do not want to be restricted with respect to the number of scans they perform."

"The product’s most valuable feature is UI. It is easy to manage and find vulnerabilities in the application."

"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."

"This is a product that I recommend and my advice for anybody who is interested in trying it, there is a free 60-day trial period where they will fix your problems without any payment."

"We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

Cons

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"The first time we ran the module, it was okay, however, the next time we ran it, it almost crashed."

"I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities."

"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."

"This solution is very expensive."

"We have had a problem with authentification."

"The scanner could be better."

"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"The dynamic scanning feature has simplified and improved the security testing process. I suggest adding a SaaS feature to the solution to support scanning SaaS applications, making it more comprehensive. It would be beneficial if the solution could also scan mobile applications. It only scans web applications and should also cover mobile applications, including firmware recommendations."

"In the future, if they can have integration with a lot of ticketing systems then it would be amazing."

"They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity."

"The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec."

"We get a lot of false positives during the tests."

"There is room for improvement in the response time of customer service and support levels."

"While Rapid7 MDR is getting better with each update or version, it needs to enhance its zero-day detection for anomalous things without relying on third-party solutions like Vericode."

"The product’s pricing could be flexible."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"The price is okay."

"This solution is very expensive."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

While Rapid7 InsightAppSec is getting better with each update or version, it needs to enhance its zero-day detection for anomalous things without relying on third-party solutions like Vericode. Hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

My main use case for Rapid7 is onboarding all new applications both built in house and third party acquired, where I run them through a sandbox environment and allow Rapid7 to conduct an initial sc...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

If you are looking for a solution that will help identify vulnerabilities and provide remediation tips for hardening your infrastructure, I think Rapid7 does an excellent job. While I do not know t...

See all answers

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 34% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 14% of the time

Veracode vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 13% of the time

AppCheck vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 4% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

September 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

InsightAppSec

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Rapid7 InsightAppSec is a cloud-based security tool offering robust web scanning capabilities with a user-friendly interface and seamless integration. It enhances dynamic application security testing through customizable modules, providing comprehensive reports and remediation guidance.

InsightAppSec delivers dynamic application security testing with features like Attack Replay and a centralized dashboard for vulnerability insights. It supports flexible deployment options and simplifies scheduling frequent scans. The tool's intuitive graphical interface and extensive scanning coverage make it valuable for identifying vulnerabilities in web applications, APIs, and e-commerce sites, ensuring compliance. However, improvements are needed in detection accuracy, reporting options, and integrations with external tools like WAF and ticketing systems. There is a need for better scan management, support for mobile applications, customized reporting options, pricing flexibility, improved support, and AI integration.

What are the key features of InsightAppSec?

Seamless Integration: Easily integrates within SDLC for automated scans.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive graphical experience.
Robust Web Scanning: Provides extensive vulnerability scanning of web applications and APIs.
Customizable Attack Modules: Tailors testing to meet specific security needs.
Attack Replay: Facilitates re-testing of potential vulnerabilities for accuracy.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users look for?

Comprehensive Reports: Delivers detailed insights into security vulnerabilities.
Remediation Guidance: Provides actionable advice to fix identified vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Supports growth by handling increased demands efficiently.
Extensive Coverage: Ensures thorough security testing across multiple platforms.
Flexible Deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.

Industries rely on InsightAppSec for vulnerability scanning to secure web applications, APIs, and e-commerce platforms. Its integration within the SDLC aids in automating scans during development. While limitations exist with certain tool integrations, its cloud-based engine and effective reporting make it essential for internal and external application security assurance.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Aaron's

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.