OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Snyk comparison

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 48 Snyk reviews

20,249 Views
1,822 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Snyk are competing products in the application security testing space. Snyk seems to have the upper hand with its superior features and agile deployment, making it more appealing to feature-focused and agile teams.

Features: OpenText provides comprehensive testing capabilities integrating well with enterprise systems and excels in enterprise-level deployments. It supports extensive testing across complex systems and offers a centralized dashboard for security management. Snyk stands out with its extensive open-source vulnerability database and seamless integration with development tools. It offers comprehensive vulnerability reports, Slack notifications, and Docker integration, making it suitable for modern development environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its flexibility and modernize its deployment models to cater to agile teams. Improving integration with contemporary development tools would be beneficial. Snyk could expand its feature set to match the extensive library of some competitors and improve its customer support responsiveness. Pricing could also be adjusted to remain competitive while offering on-prem options at a lower cost.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a traditional deployment with detailed setup guidance and structured customer support, suitable for enterprises. Snyk provides an agile deployment model, facilitating quick setup and user onboarding with responsive customer service, enhancing its value for teams seeking rapid deployment and integration.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers competitive pricing, providing high ROI for large organizations requiring extensive testing. Snyk, though potentially higher in cost, delivers significant ROI through its efficiency in handling vulnerabilities, appealing to businesses that emphasize long-term security strategy over initial cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Snyk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Snyk

Ranking in DevSecOps

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (15th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 6.5%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 24.5%, down from 29.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."

"Technical support has been good."

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

"It is scalable and very easy to use."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

"The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."

"Snyk is a good and scalable tool."

"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is that they add a lot of their own information to the vulnerabilities. They describe vulnerabilities and suggest their own mitigations or version upgrades. The information was the winning factor when we compared Snyk to others. This is what gave it more impact."

"From the software composition analysis perspective, it first makes sure that we understand what is happening from a third-party perspective for the particular product that we use. This is very difficult when you are building software and incorporating dependencies from other libraries, because those dependencies have dependencies and that chain of dependencies can go pretty deep. There could be a vulnerability in something that is seven layers deep, and it would be very difficult to understand that is even affecting us. Therefore, Snyk provides fantastic visibility to know, "Yes, we have a problem. Here is where it ultimately comes from." It may not be with what we're incorporating, but something much deeper than that."

"Snyk categorizes the level of vulnerability into high, medium, and low, which helps organizations prioritize which issues to tackle first."

"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"The scanner could be better."

"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."

"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"All such tools should definitely improve the signatures in their database. Snyk is pretty new to the industry. They have a pretty good knowledge base, but Veracode is on top because Veracode has been in this business for a pretty long time. They do have a pretty large database of all the findings, and the way that the correlation engine works is superb. Snyk is also pretty good, but it is not as good as Veracode in terms of maintaining a large space of all the historical data of vulnerabilities."

"I think Snyk should add more of a vulnerability protection feature in the tool since it is an area where it lacks."

"We have to integrate with their database, which means we need to send our entire code to them to scan, and they send us the report. A company working in the financial domain usually won't like to share its code or any information outside its network with any third-party provider."

"We have seen cases where tools didn't find or recognize certain dependencies. These are known issues, to some extent, due to the complexity in the language or stack that you using. There are some certain circumstances where the tool isn't actually finding what it's supposed to be finding, then it could be misleading."

"The tool's initial use is complex."

"The feature for automatic fixing of security breaches could be improved."

"The way Snyk notifies if we have an issue, there are a few options: High vulnerability or medium vulnerability. The problem with that is high vulnerabilities are too broad, because there are too many. If you enable notifications, you get a lot of notifications, When you get many notifications, they become irrelevant because they're not specific. I would prefer to have control over the notifications and somehow decide if I want to get only exploitable vulnerabilities or get a specific score for a vulnerability. Right now, we receive too many high vulnerabilities. If we enable notifications, then we just get a lot of spam message. Therefore, we would like some type of filtering system to be built-in for the system to be more precise."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is very expensive."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"The price is okay."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

"It is pretty expensive. It is not a cheap product."

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear."

"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify WebInspect?

The solution's technical support was very helpful.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

The price of Fortify WebInspect is high, with the cost depending on the number of virtual users. It is approximately 25% higher than other solutions.

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate. The cost of the license depends on the number of virtual users and, in comparison to...

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

August 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Download Snyk product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Fugue

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

Aaron's

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief