Continuous Dynamic and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing are competing in the application security field. Continuous Dynamic leads in pricing and support, while OpenText excels with its robust features.
Features: Continuous Dynamic provides extensive vulnerability scanning, real-time analytics, and strong support in security assessments. OpenText is known for its advanced security testing, extensive integration capabilities, and adaptability to complex environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Continuous Dynamic ensures a straightforward deployment process with reliable and proactive customer service. OpenText demands a more intricate deployment model but offers dedicated support that aids in handling complex implementations.
Pricing and ROI: Continuous Dynamic is praised for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI. OpenText, although initially costly, offers substantial ROI through its comprehensive security solutions and integration capabilities, justifying the investment.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 17.9% |
| WhiteHat Dynamic | 5.1% |
| Other | 77.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Continuous Dynamic™ is a powerful dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution that rapidly and accurately finds vulnerabilities in websites and applications. With this DAST solution, you can perform scans and testing at the scale and speed modern enterprises need to identify security risks across your entire application portfolio.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
