

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform compete in the software security and delivery market. OpenText is favored for its cost-effectiveness and support, while JFrog is preferred for feature-rich capabilities, catering to users prioritizing functionality.
Features: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides thorough application testing, delivering valuable security insights and integrating smoothly with existing workflows. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform supports a wide range of CI/CD capabilities, manages diverse deployment environments, and streamlines software release automation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText enables an easy deployment process with guided customer integration and quick support. JFrog provides extensive documentation and a self-service model, offering flexible deployments with a focus on independent setups.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is recognized for competitive pricing, offering a favorable ROI with essential security features. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform requires a higher initial investment, justified by long-term efficiencies and extensive functionality.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 6.3% |
| JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform | 2.5% |
| Other | 91.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.